DiffLoad: Uncertainty Quantification in Electrical Load Forecasting with the Diffusion Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.01001v5
• Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:31:16 GMT
• Title: DiffLoad: Uncertainty Quantification in Electrical Load Forecasting with the Diffusion Model
• Authors: Zhixian Wang, Qingsong Wen, Chaoli Zhang, Liang Sun, Yi Wang,
• Abstract summary: The integration of renewable energy sources and the occurrence of external events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have rapidly increased uncertainties in load forecasting. This paper proposes a diffusion-based Seq2Seq structure to estimate epistemic uncertainty and employs the robust additive Cauchy distribution to estimate aleatoric uncertainty.
• Score: 22.428737156882708
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Electrical load forecasting plays a crucial role in decision-making for power systems, including unit commitment and economic dispatch. The integration of renewable energy sources and the occurrence of external events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have rapidly increased uncertainties in load forecasting. The uncertainties in load forecasting can be divided into two types: epistemic uncertainty and aleatoric uncertainty. Separating these types of uncertainties can help decision-makers better understand where and to what extent the uncertainty is, thereby enhancing their confidence in the following decision-making. This paper proposes a diffusion-based Seq2Seq structure to estimate epistemic uncertainty and employs the robust additive Cauchy distribution to estimate aleatoric uncertainty. Our method not only ensures the accuracy of load forecasting but also demonstrates the ability to separate the two types of uncertainties and be applicable to different levels of loads. The relevant code can be found at \url{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DiffLoad-4714/}.

Related papers

• Evidential Uncertainty Estimation for Multi-Modal Trajectory Prediction [10.832351645863536]
  We propose a novel multi-modal trajectory prediction approach based on evidential deep learning. Our approach estimates both positional and mode probability uncertainty in real time. We perform extensive evaluations of our method on the Argoverse 1 and Argoverse 2 datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T09:46:21Z)
• Probabilistic Modeling of Disparity Uncertainty for Robust and Efficient Stereo Matching [61.73532883992135]
  We propose a new uncertainty-aware stereo matching framework. We adopt Bayes risk as the measurement of uncertainty and use it to separately estimate data and model uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T23:28:20Z)
• Integrating uncertainty quantification into randomized smoothing based robustness guarantees [18.572496359670797]
  Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks which can cause hazardous incorrect predictions in safety-critical applications. Certified robustness via randomized smoothing gives a probabilistic guarantee that the smoothed classifier's predictions will not change within an $ell$-ball around a given input. Uncertainty-based rejection is a technique often applied in practice to defend models against adversarial attacks. We demonstrate, that the novel framework allows for a systematic evaluation of different network architectures and uncertainty measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T13:07:43Z)
• How disentangled are your classification uncertainties? [6.144680854063938]
  Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning has progressed to predicting the source of uncertainty in a prediction. This work proposes a set of experiments to evaluate disentanglement of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T07:42:43Z)
• Quantifying Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty with Proper Scoring Rules [19.221081896134567]
  Uncertainty representation and quantification are paramount in machine learning. We propose measures for the quantification of aleatoric and (epistemic) uncertainty based on proper scoring rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T14:20:19Z)
• Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty via Inference-Time Sampling [57.749601811982096]
  We propose a post-hoc sampling strategy for estimating predictive uncertainty accounting for data ambiguity. The method can generate different plausible outputs for a given input and does not assume parametric forms of predictive distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T12:43:21Z)
• Integrating Uncertainty into Neural Network-based Speech Enhancement [27.868722093985006]
  Supervised masking approaches in the time-frequency domain aim to employ deep neural networks to estimate a multiplicative mask to extract clean speech. This leads to a single estimate for each input without any guarantees or measures of reliability. We study the benefits of modeling uncertainty in clean speech estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T15:55:12Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification for Traffic Forecasting: A Unified Approach [21.556559649467328]
  Uncertainty is an essential consideration for time series forecasting tasks. In this work, we focus on quantifying the uncertainty of traffic forecasting. We develop Deep S-Temporal Uncertainty Quantification (STUQ), which can estimate both aleatoric and relational uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T15:21:53Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation via an Ensemble-based Conditional Latent Variable Model [68.34559610536614]
  We argue that the aleatoric uncertainty is an inherent attribute of the data and can only be correctly estimated with an unbiased oracle model. We propose a new sampling and selection strategy at train time to approximate the oracle model for aleatoric uncertainty estimation. Our results show that our solution achieves both accurate deterministic results and reliable uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T08:54:10Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
  In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z)
• DEUP: Direct Epistemic Uncertainty Prediction [56.087230230128185]
  Epistemic uncertainty is part of out-of-sample prediction error due to the lack of knowledge of the learner. We propose a principled approach for directly estimating epistemic uncertainty by learning to predict generalization error and subtracting an estimate of aleatoric uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-16T23:50:35Z)
• The Hidden Uncertainty in a Neural Networks Activations [105.4223982696279]
  The distribution of a neural network's latent representations has been successfully used to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) data. This work investigates whether this distribution correlates with a model's epistemic uncertainty, thus indicating its ability to generalise to novel inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-05T17:30:35Z)
• Uncertainty quantification for nonconvex tensor completion: Confidence intervals, heteroscedasticity and optimality [92.35257908210316]
  We study the problem of estimating a low-rank tensor given incomplete and corrupted observations. We find that it attains unimprovable rates $ell-2$ accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T17:47:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.