Demystifying Structural Disparity in Graph Neural Networks: Can One Size Fit All?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.01323v3
• Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 03:50:52 GMT
• Title: Demystifying Structural Disparity in Graph Neural Networks: Can One Size Fit All?
• Authors: Haitao Mao, Zhikai Chen, Wei Jin, Haoyu Han, Yao Ma, Tong Zhao, Neil Shah, Jiliang Tang
• Abstract summary: Most real-world homophilic and heterophilic graphs are comprised of a mixture of nodes in both homophilic and heterophilic structural patterns. We provide evidence that Graph Neural Networks(GNNs) on node classification typically perform admirably on homophilic nodes. We then propose a rigorous, non-i.i.d PAC-Bayesian generalization bound for GNNs, revealing reasons for the performance disparity.
• Score: 61.35457647107439
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent studies on Graph Neural Networks(GNNs) provide both empirical and theoretical evidence supporting their effectiveness in capturing structural patterns on both homophilic and certain heterophilic graphs. Notably, most real-world homophilic and heterophilic graphs are comprised of a mixture of nodes in both homophilic and heterophilic structural patterns, exhibiting a structural disparity. However, the analysis of GNN performance with respect to nodes exhibiting different structural patterns, e.g., homophilic nodes in heterophilic graphs, remains rather limited. In the present study, we provide evidence that Graph Neural Networks(GNNs) on node classification typically perform admirably on homophilic nodes within homophilic graphs and heterophilic nodes within heterophilic graphs while struggling on the opposite node set, exhibiting a performance disparity. We theoretically and empirically identify effects of GNNs on testing nodes exhibiting distinct structural patterns. We then propose a rigorous, non-i.i.d PAC-Bayesian generalization bound for GNNs, revealing reasons for the performance disparity, namely the aggregated feature distance and homophily ratio difference between training and testing nodes. Furthermore, we demonstrate the practical implications of our new findings via (1) elucidating the effectiveness of deeper GNNs; and (2) revealing an over-looked distribution shift factor on graph out-of-distribution problem and proposing a new scenario accordingly.

Related papers

• Leveraging Invariant Principle for Heterophilic Graph Structure Distribution Shifts [42.77503881972965]
  Heterophilic Graph Neural Networks (HGNNs) have shown promising results for semi-supervised learning tasks on graphs. How to learn invariant node representations on heterophilic graphs to handle this structure difference or distribution shifts remains unexplored. We propose textbfHEI, a framework capable of generating invariant node representations through incorporating heterophily information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-18T14:10:34Z)
• The Heterophilic Graph Learning Handbook: Benchmarks, Models, Theoretical Analysis, Applications and Challenges [101.83124435649358]
  Homophily principle, ie nodes with the same labels or similar attributes are more likely to be connected. Recent work has identified a non-trivial set of datasets where GNN's performance compared to the NN's is not satisfactory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T18:04:32Z)
• The Heterophilic Snowflake Hypothesis: Training and Empowering GNNs for Heterophilic Graphs [59.03660013787925]
  We introduce the Heterophily Snowflake Hypothesis and provide an effective solution to guide and facilitate research on heterophilic graphs. Our observations show that our framework acts as a versatile operator for diverse tasks. It can be integrated into various GNN frameworks, boosting performance in-depth and offering an explainable approach to choosing the optimal network depth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T12:16:00Z)
• 2-hop Neighbor Class Similarity (2NCS): A graph structural metric indicative of graph neural network performance [4.051099980410583]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) achieve state-of-the-art performance on graph-structured data across numerous domains. On heterophilous graphs, in which different-type nodes are likely connected, GNNs perform less consistently. We introduce 2-hop Neighbor Class Similarity (2NCS), a new quantitative graph structural property that correlates with GNN performance more strongly and consistently than alternative metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-26T16:16:51Z)
• Discovering the Representation Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks from Multi-order Interactions [51.597480162777074]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) rely on the message passing paradigm to propagate node features and build interactions. Recent works point out that different graph learning tasks require different ranges of interactions between nodes. We study two common graph construction methods in scientific domains, i.e., emphK-nearest neighbor (KNN) graphs and emphfully-connected (FC) graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-15T11:38:14Z)
• Graph Neural Networks for Graphs with Heterophily: A Survey [98.45621222357397]
  We provide a comprehensive review of graph neural networks (GNNs) for heterophilic graphs. Specifically, we propose a systematic taxonomy that essentially governs existing heterophilic GNN models. We discuss the correlation between graph heterophily and various graph research domains, aiming to facilitate the development of more effective GNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T23:07:47Z)
• Is Homophily a Necessity for Graph Neural Networks? [50.959340355849896]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) have shown great prowess in learning representations suitable for numerous graph-based machine learning tasks. GNNs are widely believed to work well due to the homophily assumption ("like attracts like"), and fail to generalize to heterophilous graphs where dissimilar nodes connect. Recent works design new architectures to overcome such heterophily-related limitations, citing poor baseline performance and new architecture improvements on a few heterophilous graph benchmark datasets as evidence for this notion. In our experiments, we empirically find that standard graph convolutional networks (GCNs) can actually achieve better performance than
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-11T02:44:00Z)
• Two Sides of the Same Coin: Heterophily and Oversmoothing in Graph Convolutional Neural Networks [33.25212467404069]
  We theoretically characterize the connections between heterophily and oversmoothing. We design a model that addresses the discrepancy in features and degrees between neighbors by incorporating signed messages and learned degree corrections. Our experiments on 9 real networks show that our model achieves state-of-the-art performance under heterophily.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T11:52:34Z)
• Beyond Homophily in Graph Neural Networks: Current Limitations and Effective Designs [28.77753005139331]
  We investigate the representation power of graph neural networks in a semi-supervised node classification task under heterophily or low homophily. Many popular GNNs fail to generalize to this setting, and are even outperformed by models that ignore the graph structure. We identify a set of key designs that boost learning from the graph structure under heterophily.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-20T02:05:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.