The Heterophilic Graph Learning Handbook: Benchmarks, Models, Theoretical Analysis, Applications and Challenges

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09618v1
• Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 18:04:32 GMT
• Title: The Heterophilic Graph Learning Handbook: Benchmarks, Models, Theoretical Analysis, Applications and Challenges
• Authors: Sitao Luan, Chenqing Hua, Qincheng Lu, Liheng Ma, Lirong Wu, Xinyu Wang, Minkai Xu, Xiao-Wen Chang, Doina Precup, Rex Ying, Stan Z. Li, Jian Tang, Guy Wolf, Stefanie Jegelka,
• Abstract summary: Homophily principle, ie nodes with the same labels or similar attributes are more likely to be connected. Recent work has identified a non-trivial set of datasets where GNN's performance compared to the NN's is not satisfactory.
• Score: 101.83124435649358
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Homophily principle, \ie{} nodes with the same labels or similar attributes are more likely to be connected, has been commonly believed to be the main reason for the superiority of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) over traditional Neural Networks (NNs) on graph-structured data, especially on node-level tasks. However, recent work has identified a non-trivial set of datasets where GNN's performance compared to the NN's is not satisfactory. Heterophily, i.e. low homophily, has been considered the main cause of this empirical observation. People have begun to revisit and re-evaluate most existing graph models, including graph transformer and its variants, in the heterophily scenario across various kinds of graphs, e.g. heterogeneous graphs, temporal graphs and hypergraphs. Moreover, numerous graph-related applications are found to be closely related to the heterophily problem. In the past few years, considerable effort has been devoted to studying and addressing the heterophily issue. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of the latest progress on heterophilic graph learning, including an extensive summary of benchmark datasets and evaluation of homophily metrics on synthetic graphs, meticulous classification of the most updated supervised and unsupervised learning methods, thorough digestion of the theoretical analysis on homophily/heterophily, and broad exploration of the heterophily-related applications. Notably, through detailed experiments, we are the first to categorize benchmark heterophilic datasets into three sub-categories: malignant, benign and ambiguous heterophily. Malignant and ambiguous datasets are identified as the real challenging datasets to test the effectiveness of new models on the heterophily challenge. Finally, we propose several challenges and future directions for heterophilic graph representation learning.

Related papers

• Non-Homophilic Graph Pre-Training and Prompt Learning [11.996173149569627]
  We propose ProNoG, a novel pre-training and prompt learning framework for non-homophilic graphs. First, we analyze existing graph pre-training methods, providing theoretical insights into the choice of pre-training tasks. Second, recognizing that each node exhibits unique non-homophilic characteristics, we propose a conditional network to characterize the node-specific patterns in downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T17:57:31Z)
• Generation is better than Modification: Combating High Class Homophily Variance in Graph Anomaly Detection [51.11833609431406]
  Homophily distribution differences between different classes are significantly greater than those in homophilic and heterophilic graphs. We introduce a new metric called Class Homophily Variance, which quantitatively describes this phenomenon. To mitigate its impact, we propose a novel GNN model named Homophily Edge Generation Graph Neural Network (HedGe)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T14:26:53Z)
• HiGPT: Heterogeneous Graph Language Model [27.390123898556805]
  Heterogeneous graph learning aims to capture complex relationships and diverse semantics among entities in a heterogeneous graph. Existing frameworks for heterogeneous graph learning have limitations in generalizing across diverse heterogeneous graph datasets. We propose HiGPT, a general large graph model with Heterogeneous graph instruction-tuning paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T08:07:22Z)
• A Survey on Learning from Graphs with Heterophily: Recent Advances and Future Directions [35.544281678888986]
  Heterophilic graphs, where linked nodes are prone to be with different labels or dissimilar features, have recently attracted significant attention. Various graph heterophily measures, benchmark datasets, and learning paradigms are emerging rapidly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T07:36:38Z)
• Demystifying Structural Disparity in Graph Neural Networks: Can One Size Fit All? [61.35457647107439]
  Most real-world homophilic and heterophilic graphs are comprised of a mixture of nodes in both homophilic and heterophilic structural patterns. We provide evidence that Graph Neural Networks(GNNs) on node classification typically perform admirably on homophilic nodes. We then propose a rigorous, non-i.i.d PAC-Bayesian generalization bound for GNNs, revealing reasons for the performance disparity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T07:46:20Z)
• Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks using Self-supervised Reciprocally Contrastive Learning [102.9138736545956]
  Heterogeneous graph neural network (HGNN) is a very popular technique for the modeling and analysis of heterogeneous graphs. We develop for the first time a novel and robust heterogeneous graph contrastive learning approach, namely HGCL, which introduces two views on respective guidance of node attributes and graph topologies. In this new approach, we adopt distinct but most suitable attribute and topology fusion mechanisms in the two views, which are conducive to mining relevant information in attributes and topologies separately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-30T12:57:02Z)
• Graph Neural Networks for Graphs with Heterophily: A Survey [98.45621222357397]
  We provide a comprehensive review of graph neural networks (GNNs) for heterophilic graphs. Specifically, we propose a systematic taxonomy that essentially governs existing heterophilic GNN models. We discuss the correlation between graph heterophily and various graph research domains, aiming to facilitate the development of more effective GNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T23:07:47Z)
• Is Homophily a Necessity for Graph Neural Networks? [50.959340355849896]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) have shown great prowess in learning representations suitable for numerous graph-based machine learning tasks. GNNs are widely believed to work well due to the homophily assumption ("like attracts like"), and fail to generalize to heterophilous graphs where dissimilar nodes connect. Recent works design new architectures to overcome such heterophily-related limitations, citing poor baseline performance and new architecture improvements on a few heterophilous graph benchmark datasets as evidence for this notion. In our experiments, we empirically find that standard graph convolutional networks (GCNs) can actually achieve better performance than
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-11T02:44:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.