Quantum entanglement partly demystified
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04575v1
- Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 16:32:01 GMT
- Title: Quantum entanglement partly demystified
- Authors: Diederik Aerts, Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi
- Abstract summary: We consider a simple string model to explain and partly demystify the phenomenon of quantum entanglement.
We present several variants of the model, to address different objections that may arise.
We offer some final thoughts about the possibility that the quantum entanglement phenomenon might affect not only states, but also measurements.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We consider a simple string model to explain and partly demystify the
phenomenon of quantum entanglement. The model in question has nothing to do
with string theory: it uses macroscopic strings that can be acted upon by Alice
and Bob in ways that violate, or fail to violate, in different ways Bell-CHSH
inequalities and the no-signaling conditions, also called marginal laws. We
present several variants of the model, to address different objections that may
arise. This allows us to make fully visible what the quantum formalism already
suggests, about the nature of the correlations associated with entangled
states, which appear to be created in a contextual manner at each execution of
a joint measurement. We also briefly present the hidden measurement
interpretation, whose rationale is compatible with the mechanism suggested by
our string model, then offer some final thoughts about the possibility that the
quantum entanglement phenomenon might affect not only states, but also
measurements, and that our physical reality would be predominantly non-spatial
in nature.
Related papers
- What is "quantum" about quantum gravity? [0.0]
We argue that if both the equivalence principle and quantum mechanics continue to survive experimental tests, that this favors epistemic'' interpretations of quantum mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-13T21:19:50Z) - Quantum influences and event relativity [0.0]
We develop a new interpretation of quantum theory by combining insights from Wigner's friend scenarios and quantum causal modelling.
We articulate these ideas using a precise mathematical formalism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-31T17:08:22Z) - Quantum jamming brings quantum mechanics to macroscopic scales [0.0]
Kinetic constraints can enrich such a description by setting apart different species of quasiparticles.
We study dynamics following a local unjamming perturbation in a jammed state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-27T16:18:39Z) - A Quantum Theory with Non-collapsing Measurements [0.0]
A collapse-free version of quantum theory is introduced to study the role of the projection postulate.
We assume "passive" measurements that do not update quantum states while measurement outcomes still occur probabilistically.
The resulting quantum-like theory has only one type of dynamics, namely unitary evolution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-23T16:32:29Z) - Schr\"odinger cat states of a 16-microgram mechanical oscillator [54.35850218188371]
The superposition principle is one of the most fundamental principles of quantum mechanics.
Here we demonstrate the preparation of a mechanical resonator with an effective mass of 16.2 micrograms in Schr"odinger cat states of motion.
We show control over the size and phase of the superposition and investigate the decoherence dynamics of these states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-01T13:29:44Z) - Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory.
We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z) - Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same.
Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles.
We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z) - Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world.
We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z) - Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements.
As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z) - Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality.
This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment.
It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.