CARNA: Characterizing Advanced heart failure Risk and hemodyNAmic phenotypes using learned multi-valued decision diagrams

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06801v1
• Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2023 22:56:59 GMT
• Title: CARNA: Characterizing Advanced heart failure Risk and hemodyNAmic phenotypes using learned multi-valued decision diagrams
• Authors: Josephine Lamp, Yuxin Wu, Steven Lamp, Prince Afriyie, Kenneth Bilchick, Lu Feng, Sula Mazimba
• Abstract summary: CARNA is a hemodynamic risk stratification and phenotyping framework for advanced heart failure. It takes advantage of the explainability and expressivity of machine learned Multi-Valued Decision Diagrams (MVDDs) It incorporates invasive hemodynamics and can make predictions on missing data.
• Score: 6.599394944440605
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Early identification of high risk heart failure (HF) patients is key to timely allocation of life-saving therapies. Hemodynamic assessments can facilitate risk stratification and enhance understanding of HF trajectories. However, risk assessment for HF is a complex, multi-faceted decision-making process that can be challenging. Previous risk models for HF do not integrate invasive hemodynamics or support missing data, and use statistical methods prone to bias or machine learning methods that are not interpretable. To address these limitations, this paper presents CARNA, a hemodynamic risk stratification and phenotyping framework for advanced HF that takes advantage of the explainability and expressivity of machine learned Multi-Valued Decision Diagrams (MVDDs). This interpretable framework learns risk scores that predict the probability of patient outcomes, and outputs descriptive patient phenotypes (sets of features and thresholds) that characterize each predicted risk score. CARNA incorporates invasive hemodynamics and can make predictions on missing data. The CARNA models were trained and validated using a total of five advanced HF patient cohorts collected from previous trials, and compared with six established HF risk scores and three traditional ML risk models. CARNA provides robust risk stratification, outperforming all previous benchmarks. Although focused on advanced HF, the CARNA framework is general purpose and can be used to learn risk stratifications for other diseases and medical applications.

Related papers

• Event-Based Contrastive Learning for Medical Time Series [11.696805672885798]
  Event-Based Contrastive Learning (EBCL) is a method for learning embeddings of heterogeneous patient data. We demonstrate that EBCL can be used to construct models that yield improved performance on important downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T03:50:24Z)
• Interpretable Survival Analysis for Heart Failure Risk Prediction [50.64739292687567]
  We propose a novel survival analysis pipeline that is both interpretable and competitive with state-of-the-art survival models. Our pipeline achieves state-of-the-art performance and provides interesting and novel insights about risk factors for heart failure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T02:56:05Z)
• MedDiffusion: Boosting Health Risk Prediction via Diffusion-based Data Augmentation [58.93221876843639]
  This paper introduces a novel, end-to-end diffusion-based risk prediction model, named MedDiffusion. It enhances risk prediction performance by creating synthetic patient data during training to enlarge sample space. It discerns hidden relationships between patient visits using a step-wise attention mechanism, enabling the model to automatically retain the most vital information for generating high-quality data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T01:36:30Z)
• Enhancing Mortality Prediction in Heart Failure Patients: Exploring Preprocessing Methods for Imbalanced Clinical Datasets [0.0]
  Heart failure (HF) is a critical condition in which the accurate prediction of mortality plays a vital role in guiding patient management decisions. We present a comprehensive preprocessing framework including scaling, outliers processing and resampling. By leveraging appropriate preprocessing techniques and Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, we aim to improve mortality prediction performance for HF patients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T18:31:15Z)
• Neurological Prognostication of Post-Cardiac-Arrest Coma Patients Using EEG Data: A Dynamic Survival Analysis Framework with Competing Risks [4.487368901635044]
  We propose a framework for neurological prognostication of post-cardiac-arrest comatose patients using EEG data. Our framework uses any dynamic survival analysis model that supports competing risks in the form of estimating patient-level cumulative incidence functions. We demonstrate our framework by benchmarking three existing dynamic survival analysis models that support competing risks on a real dataset of 922 patients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T03:46:23Z)
• SurvLatent ODE : A Neural ODE based time-to-event model with competing risks for longitudinal data improves cancer-associated Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) prediction [68.8204255655161]
  We propose a generative time-to-event model, SurvLatent ODE, which parameterizes a latent representation under irregularly sampled data. Our model then utilizes the latent representation to flexibly estimate survival times for multiple competing events without specifying shapes of event-specific hazard function. SurvLatent ODE outperforms the current clinical standard Khorana Risk scores for stratifying DVT risk groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-20T17:28:08Z)
• A New Approach for Interpretability and Reliability in Clinical Risk Prediction: Acute Coronary Syndrome Scenario [0.33927193323747895]
  We intend to create a new risk assessment methodology that combines the best characteristics of both risk score and machine learning models. The proposed approach achieved testing results identical to the standard LR, but offers superior interpretability and personalization. The reliability estimation of individual predictions presented a great correlation with the misclassifications rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T19:33:46Z)
• Understanding Heart-Failure Patients EHR Clinical Features via SHAP Interpretation of Tree-Based Machine Learning Model Predictions [8.444557621643568]
  Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of mortality. We examined whether machine learning models, more specifically the XGBoost model, can accurately predict patient stage based on EHR. Our results indicate that based on structured data from EHR, our models could predict patients' ejection fraction (EF) scores with moderate accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-20T22:17:05Z)
• UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced Data [81.00385374948125]
  We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model. UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data. We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)
• Prediction of the onset of cardiovascular diseases from electronic health records using multi-task gated recurrent units [51.14334174570822]
  We propose a multi-task recurrent neural network with attention mechanism for predicting cardiovascular events from electronic health records. The proposed approach is compared to a standard clinical risk predictor (QRISK) and machine learning alternatives using 5-year data from a NHS Foundation Trust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T17:43:13Z)
• A General Framework for Survival Analysis and Multi-State Modelling [70.31153478610229]
  We use neural ordinary differential equations as a flexible and general method for estimating multi-state survival models. We show that our model exhibits state-of-the-art performance on popular survival data sets and demonstrate its efficacy in a multi-state setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T19:24:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.