Exponential separations between classical and quantum learners

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16028v2
• Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:41:20 GMT
• Title: Exponential separations between classical and quantum learners
• Authors: Casper Gyurik, Vedran Dunjko,
• Abstract summary: We discuss how subtle differences in definitions can result in significantly different requirements and tasks for the learner to meet and solve. We present two new learning separations where the classical difficulty primarily lies in identifying the function generating the data.
• Score: 2.209921757303168
• License:
• Abstract: Despite significant effort, the quantum machine learning community has only demonstrated quantum learning advantages for artificial cryptography-inspired datasets when dealing with classical data. In this paper we address the challenge of finding learning problems where quantum learning algorithms can achieve a provable exponential speedup over classical learning algorithms. We reflect on computational learning theory concepts related to this question and discuss how subtle differences in definitions can result in significantly different requirements and tasks for the learner to meet and solve. We examine existing learning problems with provable quantum speedups and find that they largely rely on the classical hardness of evaluating the function that generates the data, rather than identifying it. To address this, we present two new learning separations where the classical difficulty primarily lies in identifying the function generating the data. Furthermore, we explore computational hardness assumptions that can be leveraged to prove quantum speedups in scenarios where data is quantum-generated, which implies likely quantum advantages in a plethora of more natural settings (e.g., in condensed matter and high energy physics). We also discuss the limitations of the classical shadow paradigm in the context of learning separations, and how physically-motivated settings such as characterizing phases of matter and Hamiltonian learning fit in the computational learning framework.

Related papers

• Efficient Learning for Linear Properties of Bounded-Gate Quantum Circuits [63.733312560668274]
  Given a quantum circuit containing d tunable RZ gates and G-d Clifford gates, can a learner perform purely classical inference to efficiently predict its linear properties? We prove that the sample complexity scaling linearly in d is necessary and sufficient to achieve a small prediction error, while the corresponding computational complexity may scale exponentially in d. We devise a kernel-based learning model capable of trading off prediction error and computational complexity, transitioning from exponential to scaling in many practical settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T08:21:28Z)
• Separable Power of Classical and Quantum Learning Protocols Through the Lens of No-Free-Lunch Theorem [70.42372213666553]
  The No-Free-Lunch (NFL) theorem quantifies problem- and data-independent generalization errors regardless of the optimization process. We categorize a diverse array of quantum learning algorithms into three learning protocols designed for learning quantum dynamics under a specified observable. Our derived NFL theorems demonstrate quadratic reductions in sample complexity across CLC-LPs, ReQu-LPs, and Qu-LPs. We attribute this performance discrepancy to the unique capacity of quantum-related learning protocols to indirectly utilize information concerning the global phases of non-orthogonal quantum states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-12T09:05:13Z)
• Information-theoretic generalization bounds for learning from quantum data [5.0739329301140845]
  We propose a general mathematical formalism for describing quantum learning by training on classical-quantum data. We prove bounds on the expected generalization error of a quantum learner in terms of classical and quantum information-theoretic quantities. Our work lays a foundation for a unifying quantum information-theoretic perspective on quantum learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T17:21:38Z)
• Quantum algorithms: A survey of applications and end-to-end complexities [90.05272647148196]
  The anticipated applications of quantum computers span across science and industry. We present a survey of several potential application areas of quantum algorithms. We outline the challenges and opportunities in each area in an "end-to-end" fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T17:53:55Z)
• Statistical Complexity of Quantum Learning [32.48879688084909]
  This article reviews the complexity of quantum learning using information-theoretic techniques. We focus on data complexity, copy complexity, and model complexity. We highlight the differences between quantum and classical learning by addressing both supervised and unsupervised learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T20:04:05Z)
• ShadowNet for Data-Centric Quantum System Learning [188.683909185536]
  We propose a data-centric learning paradigm combining the strength of neural-network protocols and classical shadows. Capitalizing on the generalization power of neural networks, this paradigm can be trained offline and excel at predicting previously unseen systems. We present the instantiation of our paradigm in quantum state tomography and direct fidelity estimation tasks and conduct numerical analysis up to 60 qubits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T09:11:53Z)
• Quantum data learning for quantum simulations in high-energy physics [55.41644538483948]
  We explore the applicability of quantum-data learning to practical problems in high-energy physics. We make use of ansatz based on quantum convolutional neural networks and numerically show that it is capable of recognizing quantum phases of ground states. The observation of non-trivial learning properties demonstrated in these benchmarks will motivate further exploration of the quantum-data learning architecture in high-energy physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T18:00:01Z)
• Classical Verification of Quantum Learning [42.362388367152256]
  We develop a framework for classical verification of quantum learning. We propose a new quantum data access model that we call "mixture-of-superpositions" quantum examples. Our results demonstrate that the potential power of quantum data for learning tasks, while not unlimited, can be utilized by classical agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T00:31:27Z)
• A didactic approach to quantum machine learning with a single qubit [68.8204255655161]
  We focus on the case of learning with a single qubit, using data re-uploading techniques. We implement the different proposed formulations in toy and real-world datasets using the qiskit quantum computing SDK.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T18:25:32Z)
• On establishing learning separations between classical and quantum machine learning with classical data [0.0]
  We discuss the challenges of finding learning problems that quantum learning algorithms can learn much faster than any classical learning algorithm. We study existing learning problems with a provable quantum speedup to distill sets of more general and sufficient conditions. These checklists are intended to streamline one's approach to proving quantum speedups for learning problems, or to elucidate bottlenecks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-12T16:00:30Z)
• Power of data in quantum machine learning [2.1012068875084964]
  We show that some problems that are classically hard to compute can be easily predicted by classical machines learning from data. We propose a projected quantum model that provides a simple and rigorous quantum speed-up for a learning problem in the fault-tolerant regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T19:00:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.