FedDefender: Backdoor Attack Defense in Federated Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.08672v2
• Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 01:10:41 GMT
• Title: FedDefender: Backdoor Attack Defense in Federated Learning
• Authors: Waris Gill (1), Ali Anwar (2), Muhammad Ali Gulzar (1) ((1) Virginia Tech, (2) University of Minnesota Twin Cities)
• Abstract summary: Federated Learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving distributed machine learning technique. We propose FedDefender, a defense mechanism against targeted poisoning attacks in FL.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving distributed machine learning technique that enables individual clients (e.g., user participants, edge devices, or organizations) to train a model on their local data in a secure environment and then share the trained model with an aggregator to build a global model collaboratively. In this work, we propose FedDefender, a defense mechanism against targeted poisoning attacks in FL by leveraging differential testing. Our proposed method fingerprints the neuron activations of clients' models on the same input and uses differential testing to identify a potentially malicious client containing a backdoor. We evaluate FedDefender using MNIST and FashionMNIST datasets with 20 and 30 clients, and our results demonstrate that FedDefender effectively mitigates such attacks, reducing the attack success rate (ASR) to 10\% without deteriorating the global model performance.

Related papers

• FreqFed: A Frequency Analysis-Based Approach for Mitigating Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning [98.43475653490219]
  Federated learning (FL) is susceptible to poisoning attacks. FreqFed is a novel aggregation mechanism that transforms the model updates into the frequency domain. We demonstrate that FreqFed can mitigate poisoning attacks effectively with a negligible impact on the utility of the aggregated model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T16:56:24Z)
• Mitigating Cross-client GANs-based Attack in Federated Learning [78.06700142712353]
  Multi distributed multimedia clients can resort to federated learning (FL) to jointly learn a global shared model. FL suffers from the cross-client generative adversarial networks (GANs)-based (C-GANs) attack. We propose Fed-EDKD technique to improve the current popular FL schemes to resist C-GANs attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T08:15:55Z)
• FedDefender: Client-Side Attack-Tolerant Federated Learning [60.576073964874]
  Federated learning enables learning from decentralized data sources without compromising privacy. It is vulnerable to model poisoning attacks, where malicious clients interfere with the training process. We propose a new defense mechanism that focuses on the client-side, called FedDefender, to help benign clients train robust local models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-18T08:00:41Z)
• G$^2$uardFL: Safeguarding Federated Learning Against Backdoor Attacks through Attributed Client Graph Clustering [116.4277292854053]
  Federated Learning (FL) offers collaborative model training without data sharing. FL is vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where poisoned model weights lead to compromised system integrity. We present G$2$uardFL, a protective framework that reinterprets the identification of malicious clients as an attributed graph clustering problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T07:15:04Z)
• FedCC: Robust Federated Learning against Model Poisoning Attacks [0.0]
  Federated Learning is designed to address privacy concerns in learning models. New distributed paradigm safeguards data privacy but differentiates the attack surface due to the server's inaccessibility to local datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T01:52:32Z)
• FLIP: A Provable Defense Framework for Backdoor Mitigation in Federated Learning [66.56240101249803]
  We study how hardening benign clients can affect the global model (and the malicious clients) We propose a trigger reverse engineering based defense and show that our method can achieve improvement with guarantee robustness. Our results on eight competing SOTA defense methods show the empirical superiority of our method on both single-shot and continuous FL backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T22:24:03Z)
• CrowdGuard: Federated Backdoor Detection in Federated Learning [39.58317527488534]
  This paper presents a novel defense mechanism, CrowdGuard, that effectively mitigates backdoor attacks in Federated Learning. CrowdGuard employs a server-located stacked clustering scheme to enhance its resilience to rogue client feedback. The evaluation results demonstrate that CrowdGuard achieves a 100% True-Positive-Rate and True-Negative-Rate across various scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T11:27:49Z)
• FLCert: Provably Secure Federated Learning against Poisoning Attacks [67.8846134295194]
  We propose FLCert, an ensemble federated learning framework that is provably secure against poisoning attacks. Our experiments show that the label predicted by our FLCert for a test input is provably unaffected by a bounded number of malicious clients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-02T17:50:04Z)
• FL-Defender: Combating Targeted Attacks in Federated Learning [7.152674461313707]
  Federated learning (FL) enables learning a global machine learning model from local data distributed among a set of participating workers. FL is vulnerable to targeted poisoning attacks that negatively impact the integrity of the learned model. We propose textitFL-Defender as a method to combat FL targeted attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-02T16:04:46Z)
• BaFFLe: Backdoor detection via Feedback-based Federated Learning [3.6895394817068357]
  We propose Backdoor detection via Feedback-based Federated Learning (BAFFLE) We show that BAFFLE reliably detects state-of-the-art backdoor attacks with a detection accuracy of 100% and a false-positive rate below 5%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T07:44:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.