Addressing Distribution Shift in RTB Markets via Exponential Tilting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.07424v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 19:31:58 GMT
• Title: Addressing Distribution Shift in RTB Markets via Exponential Tilting
• Authors: Minji Kim, Seong Jin Lee, Bumsik Kim
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces the Exponential Tilt Reweighting Alignment (ExTRA) algorithm to address distribution shifts in data. A notable advantage of this method is its ability to operate using labeled source data and unlabeled target data. Through simulated real-world data, we investigate the nature of distribution shift and evaluate the applicacy of the proposed model.
• Score: 2.883257292731477
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Distribution shift in machine learning models can be a primary cause of performance degradation. This paper delves into the characteristics of these shifts, primarily motivated by Real-Time Bidding (RTB) market models. We emphasize the challenges posed by class imbalance and sample selection bias, both potent instigators of distribution shifts. This paper introduces the Exponential Tilt Reweighting Alignment (ExTRA) algorithm, as proposed by Marty et al. (2023), to address distribution shifts in data. The ExTRA method is designed to determine the importance weights on the source data, aiming to minimize the KL divergence between the weighted source and target datasets. A notable advantage of this method is its ability to operate using labeled source data and unlabeled target data. Through simulated real-world data, we investigate the nature of distribution shift and evaluate the applicacy of the proposed model.

Related papers

• Dr. FERMI: A Stochastic Distributionally Robust Fair Empirical Risk Minimization Framework [12.734559823650887]
  In the presence of distribution shifts, fair machine learning models may behave unfairly on test data. Existing algorithms require full access to data and cannot be used when small batches are used. This paper proposes the first distributionally robust fairness framework with convergence guarantees that do not require knowledge of the causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T23:25:28Z)
• Chasing Fairness Under Distribution Shift: A Model Weight Perturbation Approach [72.19525160912943]
  We first theoretically demonstrate the inherent connection between distribution shift, data perturbation, and model weight perturbation. We then analyze the sufficient conditions to guarantee fairness for the target dataset. Motivated by these sufficient conditions, we propose robust fairness regularization (RFR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T17:19:23Z)
• A data variation robust learning model based on importance sampling [11.285259001286978]
  We propose an importance sampling based data variation robust loss (ISloss) for learning problems which minimizes the worst case of loss under the constraint of distribution deviation. We show that the proposed method is robust under large distribution deviations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-09T04:50:06Z)
• Certifying Model Accuracy under Distribution Shifts [151.67113334248464]
  We present provable robustness guarantees on the accuracy of a model under bounded Wasserstein shifts of the data distribution. We show that a simple procedure that randomizes the input of the model within a transformation space is provably robust to distributional shifts under the transformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-28T22:03:50Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributions [90.68414180153897]
  We connect domain adaptation and predictive uncertainty literature to predict model accuracy on challenging unseen distributions. We find that the difference of confidences (DoC) of a classifier's predictions successfully estimates the classifier's performance change over a variety of shifts. We specifically investigate the distinction between synthetic and natural distribution shifts and observe that despite its simplicity DoC consistently outperforms other quantifications of distributional difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T15:50:18Z)
• Robust Generalization despite Distribution Shift via Minimum Discriminating Information [46.164498176119665]
  We introduce a modeling framework where, in addition to training data, we have partial structural knowledge of the shifted test distribution. We employ the principle of minimum discriminating information to embed the available prior knowledge. We obtain explicit generalization bounds with respect to the unknown shifted distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T15:25:35Z)
• WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts [157.53410583509924]
  Distribution shifts can substantially degrade the accuracy of machine learning systems deployed in the wild. We present WILDS, a curated collection of 8 benchmark datasets that reflect a diverse range of distribution shifts. We show that standard training results in substantially lower out-of-distribution than in-distribution performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T11:14:56Z)
• BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shift [98.90314444545204]
  We develop a methodology for assessing the robustness of models to subpopulation shift. We leverage the class structure underlying existing datasets to control the data subpopulations that comprise the training and test distributions. Applying this methodology to the ImageNet dataset, we create a suite of subpopulation shift benchmarks of varying granularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-11T17:04:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.