Confidence Contours: Uncertainty-Aware Annotation for Medical Semantic Segmentation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.07528v2
• Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 21:40:02 GMT
• Title: Confidence Contours: Uncertainty-Aware Annotation for Medical Semantic Segmentation
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel segmentation representation, Confidence Contours, which uses high- and low-confidence contours'' to capture uncertainty directly. We show that Confidence Contours provide high representative capacity without considerably higher annotator effort. We also find that general-purpose segmentation models can learn Confidence Contours at the same performance level as standard singular annotations.
• Score: 9.869558800535255
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Medical image segmentation modeling is a high-stakes task where understanding of uncertainty is crucial for addressing visual ambiguity. Prior work has developed segmentation models utilizing probabilistic or generative mechanisms to infer uncertainty from labels where annotators draw a singular boundary. However, as these annotations cannot represent an individual annotator's uncertainty, models trained on them produce uncertainty maps that are difficult to interpret. We propose a novel segmentation representation, Confidence Contours, which uses high- and low-confidence ``contours'' to capture uncertainty directly, and develop a novel annotation system for collecting contours. We conduct an evaluation on the Lung Image Dataset Consortium (LIDC) and a synthetic dataset. From an annotation study with 30 participants, results show that Confidence Contours provide high representative capacity without considerably higher annotator effort. We also find that general-purpose segmentation models can learn Confidence Contours at the same performance level as standard singular annotations. Finally, from interviews with 5 medical experts, we find that Confidence Contour maps are more interpretable than Bayesian maps due to representation of structural uncertainty.

Related papers

• SAUF-Net: Structure--Appearance Representation Learning with Uncertainty Feedback for Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation [11.11888950065648]
  We propose SAUF-Net, a structure--Appearance Representation Learning with Uncertainty Feedback Network for semi-supervised medical image segmentation.<n>We introduce an Appearance-Swapped Consistency branch to encourage structural representations to remain stable under appearance variations.<n>Experiments on ISIC-2016 and Kvasir-SEG demonstrate that SAUF-Net outperforms state-of-the-art semi-supervised methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-02T07:54:49Z)
• Principle-Guided Supervision for Interpretable Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation [15.512833015785773]
  We develop a principle-guided uncertainty supervision framework (PriUS) based on evidential learning.<n>PriUS produces more consistent uncertainty estimates while maintaining competitive segmentation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T05:17:20Z)
• DeferredSeg: A Multi-Expert Deferral Framework for Trustworthy Medical Image Segmentation [66.24948946364329]
  We introduce DeferredSeg, a deferral-aware segmentation framework that defers predictions to human experts in specific regions.<n>We evaluate DeferredSeg on three challenging medical datasets using MedSAM and CENet as the base segmentor for fair comparison.<n> Experimental results show that DeferredSeg consistently outperforms the baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T07:50:31Z)
• Delving Aleatoric Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation via Vision Foundation Models [56.29123284262618]
  This work proposes leveraging the universal representation capabilities of visual foundation models to estimate inherent data uncertainty.<n>We analyze the feature diversity of the model's decoded representations and quantify their singular value energy to define the semantic perception scale for each class.<n>Based on this foundation, we design two uncertainty-driven application strategies: (1) the aleatoric uncertainty-aware data filtering mechanism to eliminate potentially noisy samples and enhance model learning quality; and (2) the dynamic uncertainty-aware optimization strategy that adaptively adjusts class-specific loss weights during training based on the semantic perception scale, combined with a label denoising mechanism to improve training stability
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T03:59:54Z)
• On the Fairness, Diversity and Reliability of Text-to-Image Generative Models [68.62012304574012]
  multimodal generative models have sparked critical discussions on their reliability, fairness and potential for misuse.<n>We propose an evaluation framework to assess model reliability by analyzing responses to global and local perturbations in the embedding space.<n>Our method lays the groundwork for detecting unreliable, bias-injected models and tracing the provenance of embedded biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T09:46:55Z)
• Affinity-Graph-Guided Contractive Learning for Pretext-Free Medical Image Segmentation with Minimal Annotation [55.325956390997]
  This paper proposes an affinity-graph-guided semi-supervised contrastive learning framework (Semi-AGCL) for medical image segmentation. The framework first designs an average-patch-entropy-driven inter-patch sampling method, which can provide a robust initial feature space. With merely 10% of the complete annotation set, our model approaches the accuracy of the fully annotated baseline, manifesting a marginal deviation of only 2.52%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T10:44:47Z)
• Unsupervised Model Diagnosis [49.36194740479798]
  This paper proposes Unsupervised Model Diagnosis (UMO) to produce semantic counterfactual explanations without any user guidance. Our approach identifies and visualizes changes in semantics, and then matches these changes to attributes from wide-ranging text sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T17:59:03Z)
• An Ambiguity Measure for Recognizing the Unknowns in Deep Learning [0.0]
  We study the understanding of deep neural networks from the scope in which they are trained on. We propose a measure for quantifying the ambiguity of inputs for any given model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T02:57:12Z)
• On the Out of Distribution Robustness of Foundation Models in Medical Image Segmentation [47.95611203419802]
  Foundations for vision and language, pre-trained on extensive sets of natural image and text data, have emerged as a promising approach. We compare the generalization performance to unseen domains of various pre-trained models after being fine-tuned on the same in-distribution dataset. We further developed a new Bayesian uncertainty estimation for frozen models and used them as an indicator to characterize the model's performance on out-of-distribution data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T14:52:10Z)
• Hierarchical Uncertainty Estimation for Medical Image Segmentation Networks [1.9564356751775307]
  Uncertainty exists in both images (noise) and manual annotations (human errors and bias) used for model training. We propose a simple yet effective method for estimating uncertainties at multiple levels. We demonstrate that a deep learning segmentation network such as U-net, can achieve a high segmentation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T16:09:23Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by Modeling Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [57.023423137202485]
  Concerns regarding the reliability of medical image segmentation persist among clinicians.<n>We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks.<n>By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for medical image segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z)
• Trustworthy Medical Segmentation with Uncertainty Estimation [0.7829352305480285]
  This paper introduces a new Bayesian deep learning framework for uncertainty quantification in segmentation neural networks. We evaluate the proposed framework on medical image segmentation data from Magnetic Resonances Imaging and Computed Tomography scans. Our experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework is more robust to noise and adversarial attacks as compared to state-of-the-art segmentation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-10T22:46:05Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Segmentation with Multi-decoder U-Net [3.961279440272763]
  We exploit the medical image segmentation uncertainty by measuring segmentation performance with multiple annotations in a supervised learning manner. We propose a U-Net based architecture with multiple decoders, where the image representation is encoded with the same encoder, and segmentation referring to each annotation is estimated with multiple decoders. The proposed architecture is trained in an end-to-end manner and able to improve predictive uncertainty estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-15T01:46:29Z)
• Learning Uncertainty For Safety-Oriented Semantic Segmentation In Autonomous Driving [77.39239190539871]
  We show how uncertainty estimation can be leveraged to enable safety critical image segmentation in autonomous driving. We introduce a new uncertainty measure based on disagreeing predictions as measured by a dissimilarity function. We show experimentally that our proposed approach is much less computationally intensive at inference time than competing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-28T09:23:05Z)
• Spatially Varying Label Smoothing: Capturing Uncertainty from Expert Annotations [19.700271444378618]
  The task of image segmentation is inherently noisy due to ambiguities regarding the exact location of boundaries between anatomical structures. We argue that this information can be extracted from the expert annotations at no extra cost, and it can lead to improved calibration between soft probabilistic predictions and the underlying uncertainty. We built upon label smoothing (LS) where a network is trained on 'blurred' versions of the ground truth labels which has been shown to be effective for calibrating output predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T19:35:51Z)
• Scribble-Supervised Semantic Segmentation by Uncertainty Reduction on Neural Representation and Self-Supervision on Neural Eigenspace [21.321005898976253]
  Scribble-supervised semantic segmentation has gained much attention recently for its promising performance without high-quality annotations. This work aims to achieve semantic segmentation by scribble annotations directly without extra information and other limitations. We propose holistic operations, including minimizing entropy and a network embedded random walk on neural representation to reduce uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-19T12:33:57Z)
• Proactive Pseudo-Intervention: Causally Informed Contrastive Learning For Interpretable Vision Models [103.64435911083432]
  We present a novel contrastive learning strategy called it Proactive Pseudo-Intervention (PPI) PPI leverages proactive interventions to guard against image features with no causal relevance. We also devise a novel causally informed salience mapping module to identify key image pixels to intervene, and show it greatly facilitates model interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-06T20:30:26Z)
• Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty [66.17147341354577]
  We argue for considering a complementary form of transparency by estimating and communicating the uncertainty associated with model predictions. We describe how uncertainty can be used to mitigate model unfairness, augment decision-making, and build trustworthy systems. This work constitutes an interdisciplinary review drawn from literature spanning machine learning, visualization/HCI, design, decision-making, and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-15T17:26:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.