Interpretation on Multi-modal Visual Fusion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.10019v1
• Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 14:01:04 GMT
• Title: Interpretation on Multi-modal Visual Fusion
• Authors: Hao Chen, Haoran Zhou, Yongjian Deng
• Abstract summary: We present an analytical framework and a novel metric to shed light on the interpretation of the multimodal vision community. We investigate the consistency and speciality of representations across modalities, evolution rules within each modality, and the collaboration logic used when optimizing a multi-modality model.
• Score: 10.045591415286516
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we present an analytical framework and a novel metric to shed light on the interpretation of the multimodal vision community. Our approach involves measuring the proposed semantic variance and feature similarity across modalities and levels, and conducting semantic and quantitative analyses through comprehensive experiments. Specifically, we investigate the consistency and speciality of representations across modalities, evolution rules within each modality, and the collaboration logic used when optimizing a multi-modality model. Our studies reveal several important findings, such as the discrepancy in cross-modal features and the hybrid multi-modal cooperation rule, which highlights consistency and speciality simultaneously for complementary inference. Through our dissection and findings on multi-modal fusion, we facilitate a rethinking of the reasonability and necessity of popular multi-modal vision fusion strategies. Furthermore, our work lays the foundation for designing a trustworthy and universal multi-modal fusion model for a variety of tasks in the future.

Related papers

• Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey [124.23247710880008]
  multimodal CoT (MCoT) reasoning has recently garnered significant research attention. Existing MCoT studies design various methodologies to address the challenges of image, video, speech, audio, 3D, and structured data. We present the first systematic survey of MCoT reasoning, elucidating the relevant foundational concepts and definitions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-16T18:39:13Z)
• A Survey on Mechanistic Interpretability for Multi-Modal Foundation Models [74.48084001058672]
  The rise of foundation models has transformed machine learning research. multimodal foundation models (MMFMs) pose unique interpretability challenges beyond unimodal frameworks. This survey explores two key aspects: (1) the adaptation of LLM interpretability methods to multimodal models and (2) understanding the mechanistic differences between unimodal language models and crossmodal systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T20:55:26Z)
• Progressive Multimodal Reasoning via Active Retrieval [64.74746997923967]
  Multi-step multimodal reasoning tasks pose significant challenges for large language models (MLLMs) We propose AR-MCTS, a universal framework designed to progressively improve the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs. We show that AR-MCTS can optimize sampling diversity and accuracy, yielding reliable multimodal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T13:25:39Z)
• On the Comparison between Multi-modal and Single-modal Contrastive Learning [50.74988548106031]
  We introduce a theoretical foundation for understanding the differences between multi-modal and single-modal contrastive learning. We identify the critical factor, which is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), that impacts the generalizability in downstream tasks of both multi-modal and single-modal contrastive learning. Our analysis provides a unified framework that can characterize the optimization and generalization of both single-modal and multi-modal contrastive learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T06:21:17Z)
• What to align in multimodal contrastive learning? [7.7439394183358745]
  We introduce Contrastive MultiModal learning strategy that enables the communication between modalities in a single multimodal space. Our theoretical analysis shows that shared, synergistic and unique terms of information naturally emerge from this formulation, allowing us to estimate multimodal interactions beyond redundancy. In the latter, CoMM learns complex multimodal interactions and achieves state-of-the-art results on the six multimodal benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T16:42:22Z)
• Asynchronous Multimodal Video Sequence Fusion via Learning Modality-Exclusive and -Agnostic Representations [19.731611716111566]
  We propose a Multimodal fusion approach for learning modality-Exclusive and modality-Agnostic representations. We introduce a predictive self-attention module to capture reliable context dynamics within modalities. A hierarchical cross-modal attention module is designed to explore valuable element correlations among modalities. A double-discriminator strategy is presented to ensure the production of distinct representations in an adversarial manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-06T04:36:48Z)
• Confidence-aware multi-modality learning for eye disease screening [58.861421804458395]
  We propose a novel multi-modality evidential fusion pipeline for eye disease screening. It provides a measure of confidence for each modality and elegantly integrates the multi-modality information. Experimental results on both public and internal datasets demonstrate that our model excels in robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T13:27:30Z)
• Multiple Heads are Better than One: Mixture of Modality Knowledge Experts for Entity Representation Learning [51.80447197290866]
  Learning high-quality multi-modal entity representations is an important goal of multi-modal knowledge graph (MMKG) representation learning. Existing methods focus on crafting elegant entity-wise multi-modal fusion strategies. We introduce a novel framework with Mixture of Modality Knowledge experts (MoMoK) to learn adaptive multi-modal entity representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T06:36:17Z)
• Unified Multi-modal Unsupervised Representation Learning for Skeleton-based Action Understanding [62.70450216120704]
  Unsupervised pre-training has shown great success in skeleton-based action understanding. We propose a Unified Multimodal Unsupervised Representation Learning framework, called UmURL. UmURL exploits an efficient early-fusion strategy to jointly encode the multi-modal features in a single-stream manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T13:56:57Z)
• MM-BigBench: Evaluating Multimodal Models on Multimodal Content Comprehension Tasks [56.60050181186531]
  We introduce MM-BigBench, which incorporates a diverse range of metrics to offer an extensive evaluation of the performance of various models and instructions. Our paper evaluates a total of 20 language models (14 MLLMs) on 14 multimodal datasets spanning 6 tasks, with 10 instructions for each task, and derives novel insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T11:57:04Z)
• Decoupling Common and Unique Representations for Multimodal Self-supervised Learning [22.12729786091061]
  We propose Decoupling Common and Unique Representations (DeCUR), a simple yet effective method for multimodal self-supervised learning. By distinguishing inter- and intra-modal embeddings through multimodal redundancy reduction, DeCUR can integrate complementary information across different modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-11T08:35:23Z)
• Alternative Telescopic Displacement: An Efficient Multimodal Alignment Method [3.0903319879656084]
  This paper introduces an innovative approach to feature alignment that revolutionizes the fusion of multimodal information. Our method employs a novel iterative process of telescopic displacement and expansion of feature representations across different modalities, culminating in a coherent unified representation within a shared feature space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T13:49:06Z)
• Quantifying & Modeling Multimodal Interactions: An Information Decomposition Framework [89.8609061423685]
  We propose an information-theoretic approach to quantify the degree of redundancy, uniqueness, and synergy relating input modalities with an output task. To validate PID estimation, we conduct extensive experiments on both synthetic datasets where the PID is known and on large-scale multimodal benchmarks. We demonstrate their usefulness in (1) quantifying interactions within multimodal datasets, (2) quantifying interactions captured by multimodal models, (3) principled approaches for model selection, and (4) three real-world case studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T18:59:05Z)
• SHAPE: An Unified Approach to Evaluate the Contribution and Cooperation of Individual Modalities [7.9602600629569285]
  We use bf SHapley vbf Alue-based bf PErceptual (SHAPE) scores to measure the marginal contribution of individual modalities and the degree of cooperation across modalities. Our experiments suggest that for some tasks where different modalities are complementary, the multi-modal models still tend to use the dominant modality alone. We hope our scores can help improve the understanding of how the present multi-modal models operate on different modalities and encourage more sophisticated methods of integrating multiple modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-30T16:35:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.