Navigating the acceptance of implementing business intelligence in
organizations: A system dynamics approach
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.10244v1
- Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 12:14:20 GMT
- Title: Navigating the acceptance of implementing business intelligence in
organizations: A system dynamics approach
- Authors: Mehrdad Maghsoudi, Navid Nezafati
- Abstract summary: Business intelligence (BI) enables organizations to leverage data-driven insights for better decision-making.
This study examines the factors affecting the implementation of BI projects.
It compares traditional and self-service implementation approaches.
- Score: 1.6317061277457001
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The rise of information technology has transformed the business landscape,
with organizations increasingly relying on information systems to collect and
store vast amounts of data. To stay competitive, businesses must harness this
data to make informed decisions that optimize their actions in response to the
market. Business intelligence (BI) is an approach that enables organizations to
leverage data-driven insights for better decision-making, but implementing BI
comes with its own set of challenges. Accordingly, understanding the key
factors that contribute to successful implementation is crucial.
This study examines the factors affecting the implementation of BI projects
by analyzing the interactions between these factors using system dynamics
modeling. The research draws on interviews with five BI experts and a review of
the background literature to identify effective implementation strategies.
Specifically, the study compares traditional and self-service implementation
approaches and simulates their respective impacts on organizational acceptance
of BI. The results show that the two approaches were equally effective in
generating organizational acceptance until the twenty-fifth month of
implementation, after which the self-service strategy generated significantly
higher levels of acceptance than the traditional strategy. In fact, after 60
months, the self-service approach was associated with a 30% increase in
organizational acceptance over the traditional approach. The paper also
provides recommendations for increasing the acceptance of BI in both
implementation strategies. Overall, this study underscores the importance of
identifying and addressing key factors that impact BI implementation success,
offering practical guidance to organizations seeking to leverage the power of
BI in today's competitive business environment.
Related papers
- Enhancing Language Model Rationality with Bi-Directional Deliberation Reasoning [73.77288647011295]
This paper introduces BI-Directional DEliberation Reasoning (BIDDER) to enhance the decision rationality of language models.
Our approach involves three key processes:.
Inferring hidden states to represent uncertain information in the decision-making process from historical data;.
Using hidden states to predict future potential states and potential outcomes;.
Integrating historical information (past contexts) and long-term outcomes (future contexts) to inform reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-08T16:48:48Z) - ABI Approach: Automatic Bias Identification in Decision-Making Under Risk based in an Ontology of Behavioral Economics [46.57327530703435]
Risk seeking preferences for losses, driven by biases such as loss aversion, pose challenges and can result in severe negative consequences.
This research introduces the ABI approach, a novel solution designed to support organizational decision-makers by automatically identifying and explaining risk seeking preferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-22T23:53:46Z) - LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Models [75.89014602596673]
Strategic reasoning requires understanding and predicting adversary actions in multi-agent settings while adjusting strategies accordingly.
We explore the scopes, applications, methodologies, and evaluation metrics related to strategic reasoning with Large Language Models.
It underscores the importance of strategic reasoning as a critical cognitive capability and offers insights into future research directions and potential improvements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-01T16:50:54Z) - GPT in Data Science: A Practical Exploration of Model Selection [0.7646713951724013]
This research is committed to advancing our comprehension of AI decision-making processes.
Our efforts are directed towards creating AI systems that are more transparent and comprehensible.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-20T03:42:24Z) - Rational Decision-Making Agent with Internalized Utility Judgment [91.80700126895927]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable advancements and have attracted significant efforts to develop LLMs into agents capable of executing intricate multi-step decision-making tasks beyond traditional NLP applications.
This paper proposes RadAgent, which fosters the development of its rationality through an iterative framework involving Experience Exploration and Utility Learning.
Experimental results on the ToolBench dataset demonstrate RadAgent's superiority over baselines, achieving over 10% improvement in Pass Rate on diverse tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-24T03:11:45Z) - Inverse Online Learning: Understanding Non-Stationary and Reactionary
Policies [79.60322329952453]
We show how to develop interpretable representations of how agents make decisions.
By understanding the decision-making processes underlying a set of observed trajectories, we cast the policy inference problem as the inverse to this online learning problem.
We introduce a practical algorithm for retrospectively estimating such perceived effects, alongside the process through which agents update them.
Through application to the analysis of UNOS organ donation acceptance decisions, we demonstrate that our approach can bring valuable insights into the factors that govern decision processes and how they change over time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-14T17:40:42Z) - AI Assurance using Causal Inference: Application to Public Policy [0.0]
Most AI approaches can only be represented as "black boxes" and suffer from the lack of transparency.
It is crucial not only to develop effective and robust AI systems, but to make sure their internal processes are explainable and fair.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-01T16:03:06Z) - Dynamic enterprise architecture capabilities and organizational
benefits: an empirical mediation study [0.0]
This study focuses on EA-based capabilities, using the dynamic capabilities view as a theoretical foundation.
It develops and tests a new research model that explains how dynamic enterprise architecture capabilities lead to organizational benefits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-18T10:07:31Z) - Leveraging Expert Consistency to Improve Algorithmic Decision Support [62.61153549123407]
We explore the use of historical expert decisions as a rich source of information that can be combined with observed outcomes to narrow the construct gap.
We propose an influence function-based methodology to estimate expert consistency indirectly when each case in the data is assessed by a single expert.
Our empirical evaluation, using simulations in a clinical setting and real-world data from the child welfare domain, indicates that the proposed approach successfully narrows the construct gap.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-24T05:40:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.