Large Language Models Vote: Prompting for Rare Disease Identification
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.12890v3
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 13:42:03 GMT
- Title: Large Language Models Vote: Prompting for Rare Disease Identification
- Abstract summary: We propose Models-Vote Prompting (MVP), a flexible prompting approach for improving the performance of generative Large Language Models (LLMs)
MVP works by prompting numerous LLMs to perform the same tasks and conducting a majority vote on the resulting outputs.
We also release a novel rare disease dataset for FSL, available to those who signed the MIMIC-IV Data Use Agreement (DUA)
- Score: 3.2063918860622795
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: The emergence of generative Large Language Models (LLMs) emphasizes the need
for accurate and efficient prompting approaches. LLMs are often applied in
Few-Shot Learning (FSL) contexts, where tasks are executed with minimal
training data. FSL has become popular in many Artificial Intelligence (AI)
subdomains, including AI for health. Rare diseases affect a small fraction of
the population. Rare disease identification from clinical notes inherently
requires FSL techniques due to limited data availability. Manual data
collection and annotation is both expensive and time-consuming. In this paper,
we propose Models-Vote Prompting (MVP), a flexible prompting approach for
improving the performance of LLM queries in FSL settings. MVP works by
prompting numerous LLMs to perform the same tasks and then conducting a
majority vote on the resulting outputs. This method achieves improved results
to any one model in the ensemble on one-shot rare disease identification and
classification tasks. We also release a novel rare disease dataset for FSL,
available to those who signed the MIMIC-IV Data Use Agreement (DUA).
Furthermore, in using MVP, each model is prompted multiple times, substantially
increasing the time needed for manual annotation, and to address this, we
assess the feasibility of using JSON for automating generative LLM evaluation.
Related papers
- LLM4CKD: Large Language Models for Early Stage Chronic Kidney Disease Screening [0.5442955439283729]
Early screening of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is critical for timely intervention.<n>Most machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches require labeled data and model training.<n>This study evaluates the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) for CKD screening under zero-shot and few-shot in-context learning settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-03T15:53:20Z) - Enhancing the Medical Context-Awareness Ability of LLMs via Multifaceted Self-Refinement Learning [49.559151128219725]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown great promise in the medical domain, achieving strong performance on several benchmarks.<n>However, they continue to underperform in real-world medical scenarios, which often demand stronger context-awareness.<n>We propose Multifaceted Self-Refinement (MuSeR), a data-driven approach that enhances LLMs' context-awareness along three key facets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T08:13:23Z) - Can LLM Annotations Replace User Clicks for Learning to Rank? [112.2254432364736]
Large-scale supervised data is essential for training modern ranking models, but obtaining high-quality human annotations is costly.<n>Click data has been widely used as a low-cost alternative, and with recent advances in large language models (LLMs), LLM-based relevance annotation has emerged as another promising annotation.<n> Experiments on both a public dataset, TianGong-ST, and an industrial dataset, Baidu-Click, show that click-supervised models perform better on high-frequency queries.<n>We explore two training strategies -- data scheduling and frequency-aware multi-objective learning -- that integrate both supervision signals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-10T02:26:14Z) - LA-MARRVEL: A Knowledge-Grounded and Language-Aware LLM Reranker for AI-MARRVEL in Rare Disease Diagnosis [6.8308581520283225]
Large language models (LLMs) can read such text, but clinical use needs grounding in citable knowledge and stable, repeatable behavior.<n>LA-MARRVEL has three parts: expert-engineered context that enriches phenotype and disease information; a ranked voting algorithm that combines multiple LLM runs to choose a consensus ranked gene list; and the AI-MARRVEL pipeline that provides first-stage ranks and gene annotations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-04T05:17:41Z) - Enhancing Code Generation for Low-Resource Languages: No Silver Bullet [55.39571645315926]
Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on large and diverse datasets to learn syntax, semantics, and usage patterns of programming languages.
For low-resource languages, the limited availability of such data hampers the models' ability to generalize effectively.
We present an empirical study investigating the effectiveness of several approaches for boosting LLMs' performance on low-resource languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-31T12:23:28Z) - Labels Generated by Large Language Model Helps Measuring People's Empathy in Vitro [9.536979155245026]
Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionised numerous fields.
This paper explores its potential in in-vitro applications.
We evaluate this approach in the emerging field of empathy computing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-01T01:06:58Z) - Learning with Less: Knowledge Distillation from Large Language Models via Unlabeled Data [54.934578742209716]
In real-world NLP applications, Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising solutions due to their extensive training on vast datasets.
LLKD is an adaptive sample selection method that incorporates signals from both the teacher and student.
Our comprehensive experiments show that LLKD achieves superior performance across various datasets with higher data efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-12T18:57:59Z) - SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts.
We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM.
We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z) - Large Language Models Can Automatically Engineer Features for Few-Shot Tabular Learning [35.03338699349037]
We propose a novel in-context learning framework, FeatLLM, which employs Large Language Models as feature engineers.
FeatLLM generates high-quality rules, significantly (10% on average) outperforming alternatives such as TabLLM and STUNT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-15T06:26:08Z) - Self-Supervised Multiple Instance Learning for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Classification [1.1874560263468232]
Diseases like Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) pose challenges due to scarce and costly annotations on a single-cell level.
Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) addresses weakly labeled scenarios but necessitates powerful encoders typically trained with labeled data.
In this study, we explore Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) as a pre-training approach for MIL-based subtype AML classification from blood smears.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-08T15:16:15Z) - LLMaAA: Making Large Language Models as Active Annotators [32.57011151031332]
We propose LLMaAA, which takes large language models as annotators and puts them into an active learning loop to determine what to annotate efficiently.
We conduct experiments and analysis on two classic NLP tasks, named entity recognition and relation extraction.
With LLMaAA, task-specific models trained from LLM-generated labels can outperform the teacher within only hundreds of annotated examples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T14:54:15Z) - ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases.
We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets.
Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z) - CulturaX: A Cleaned, Enormous, and Multilingual Dataset for Large
Language Models in 167 Languages [86.90220551111096]
Training datasets for large language models (LLMs) are often not fully disclosed.
We present CulturaX, a substantial multilingual dataset with 6.3 trillion tokens in 167 languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-17T23:49:10Z) - The first step is the hardest: Pitfalls of Representing and Tokenizing
Temporal Data for Large Language Models [10.414206635385632]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable generalization across diverse tasks.
A notable obstacle emerges when feeding numerical/temporal data into these models, such as data sourced from wearables or electronic health records.
We discuss recent works that employ LLMs for human-centric tasks such as in mobile health sensing and present a case study showing that popular LLMs tokenize temporal data incorrectly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-12T13:51:29Z) - From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets.
Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z) - Wisdom of Instruction-Tuned Language Model Crowds. Exploring Model Label Variation [37.14258903995738]
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable text classification capabilities.
Recent studies emphasize the importance of considering human label variation in data annotation.
We evaluate four recent instruction-tuned LLMs as annotators on five subjective tasks across four languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-24T17:49:31Z) - AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotators [98.11286353828525]
GPT-3.5 series models have demonstrated remarkable few-shot and zero-shot ability across various NLP tasks.
We propose AnnoLLM, which adopts a two-step approach, explain-then-annotate.
We build the first conversation-based information retrieval dataset employing AnnoLLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-29T17:03:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.