ReMAV: Reward Modeling of Autonomous Vehicles for Finding Likely Failure Events

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14550v2
• Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 11:05:53 GMT
• Title: ReMAV: Reward Modeling of Autonomous Vehicles for Finding Likely Failure Events
• Authors: Aizaz Sharif and Dusica Marijan
• Abstract summary: We propose a black-box testing framework that uses offline trajectories first to analyze the existing behavior of autonomous vehicles. Our experiment shows an increase in 35, 23, 48, and 50% in the occurrences of vehicle collision, road object collision, pedestrian collision, and offroad steering events.
• Score: 1.84926694477846
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous vehicles are advanced driving systems that are well known to be vulnerable to various adversarial attacks, compromising vehicle safety and posing a risk to other road users. Rather than actively training complex adversaries by interacting with the environment, there is a need to first intelligently find and reduce the search space to only those states where autonomous vehicles are found to be less confident. In this paper, we propose a black-box testing framework ReMAV that uses offline trajectories first to analyze the existing behavior of autonomous vehicles and determine appropriate thresholds to find the probability of failure events. To this end, we introduce a three-step methodology which i) uses offline state action pairs of any autonomous vehicle under test, ii) builds an abstract behavior representation using our designed reward modeling technique to analyze states with uncertain driving decisions, and iii) uses a disturbance model for minimal perturbation attacks where the driving decisions are less confident. Our reward modeling technique helps in creating a behavior representation that allows us to highlight regions of likely uncertain behavior even when the standard autonomous vehicle performs well. We perform our experiments in a high-fidelity urban driving environment using three different driving scenarios containing single- and multi-agent interactions. Our experiment shows an increase in 35, 23, 48, and 50% in the occurrences of vehicle collision, road object collision, pedestrian collision, and offroad steering events, respectively by the autonomous vehicle under test, demonstrating a significant increase in failure events. We compare ReMAV with two baselines and show that ReMAV demonstrates significantly better effectiveness in generating failure events compared to the baselines in all evaluation metrics.

Related papers

• SimADFuzz: Simulation-Feedback Fuzz Testing for Autonomous Driving Systems [5.738863204900633]
  SimADFuzz is a novel framework designed to generate high-quality scenarios that reveal violations in autonomous driving systems. SimADFuzz employs violation prediction models, which evaluate the likelihood of ADS violations, to optimize scenario selection. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that SimADFuzz outperforms state-of-the-art fuzzers by identifying 32 more unique violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T12:49:57Z)
• Generating Critical Scenarios for Testing Automated Driving Systems [5.975915967339764]
  AVASTRA is a Reinforcement Learning-based approach to generate realistic critical scenarios for testing Autonomous Driving System. Results show AVASTRA's ability to outperform the state-of-the-art approach by generating 30% to 115% more collision scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T16:59:30Z)
• A Multi-Loss Strategy for Vehicle Trajectory Prediction: Combining Off-Road, Diversity, and Directional Consistency Losses [68.68514648185828]
  Trajectory prediction is essential for the safety and efficiency of planning in autonomous vehicles. Current models often fail to fully capture complex traffic rules and the complete range of potential vehicle movements. This study introduces three novel loss functions: Offroad Loss, Direction Consistency Error, and Diversity Loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T14:47:08Z)
• Foundation Models for Rapid Autonomy Validation [4.417336418010182]
  A key challenge is that an autonomous vehicle requires testing in every kind of driving scenario it could encounter. We propose the use of a behavior foundation model, specifically a masked autoencoder (MAE), trained to reconstruct driving scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T15:32:43Z)
• Work-in-Progress: Crash Course: Can (Under Attack) Autonomous Driving Beat Human Drivers? [60.51287814584477]
  This paper evaluates the inherent risks in autonomous driving by examining the current landscape of AVs. We develop specific claims highlighting the delicate balance between the advantages of AVs and potential security challenges in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T09:42:21Z)
• Decision Making for Autonomous Driving in Interactive Merge Scenarios via Learning-based Prediction [39.48631437946568]
  This paper focuses on the complex task of merging into moving traffic where uncertainty emanates from the behavior of other drivers. We frame the problem as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) and solve it online with Monte Carlo tree search. The solution to the POMDP is a policy that performs high-level driving maneuvers, such as giving way to an approaching car, keeping a safe distance from the vehicle in front or merging into traffic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T16:12:45Z)
• Safety-aware Motion Prediction with Unseen Vehicles for Autonomous Driving [104.32241082170044]
  We study a new task, safety-aware motion prediction with unseen vehicles for autonomous driving. Unlike the existing trajectory prediction task for seen vehicles, we aim at predicting an occupancy map. Our approach is the first one that can predict the existence of unseen vehicles in most cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-03T13:33:33Z)
• Multi-Modal Fusion Transformer for End-to-End Autonomous Driving [59.60483620730437]
  We propose TransFuser, a novel Multi-Modal Fusion Transformer, to integrate image and LiDAR representations using attention. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art driving performance while reducing collisions by 76% compared to geometry-based fusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T11:48:13Z)
• Deep Structured Reactive Planning [94.92994828905984]
  We propose a novel data-driven, reactive planning objective for self-driving vehicles. We show that our model outperforms a non-reactive variant in successfully completing highly complex maneuvers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T01:43:36Z)
• Detecting 32 Pedestrian Attributes for Autonomous Vehicles [103.87351701138554]
  In this paper, we address the problem of jointly detecting pedestrians and recognizing 32 pedestrian attributes. We introduce a Multi-Task Learning (MTL) model relying on a composite field framework, which achieves both goals in an efficient way. We show competitive detection and attribute recognition results, as well as a more stable MTL training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-04T15:10:12Z)
• Adversarial Evaluation of Autonomous Vehicles in Lane-Change Scenarios [10.53961877853783]
  We propose an adaptive evaluation framework to efficiently evaluate autonomous vehicles in adversarial environments. Considering the multimodal nature of dangerous scenarios, we use ensemble models to represent different local optimums for diversity. Results show that the adversarial scenarios generated by our method significantly degrade the performance of the tested vehicles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-14T14:12:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.