The Anatomy of Conspirators: Unveiling Traits using a Comprehensive Twitter Dataset

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15154v2
• Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:11:37 GMT
• Title: The Anatomy of Conspirators: Unveiling Traits using a Comprehensive Twitter Dataset
• Authors: Margherita Gambini, Serena Tardelli, Maurizio Tesconi
• Abstract summary: We present a novel methodology for constructing a Twitter dataset that encompasses accounts engaged in conspiracy-related activities throughout the year 2022. This comprehensive collection effort yielded a total of 15K accounts and 37M tweets extracted from their timelines. We conduct a comparative analysis of the two groups across three dimensions: topics, profiles, and behavioral characteristics.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The discourse around conspiracy theories is currently thriving amidst the rampant misinformation in online environments. Research in this field has been focused on detecting conspiracy theories on social media, often relying on limited datasets. In this study, we present a novel methodology for constructing a Twitter dataset that encompasses accounts engaged in conspiracy-related activities throughout the year 2022. Our approach centers on data collection that is independent of specific conspiracy theories and information operations. Additionally, our dataset includes a control group comprising randomly selected users who can be fairly compared to the individuals involved in conspiracy activities. This comprehensive collection effort yielded a total of 15K accounts and 37M tweets extracted from their timelines. We conduct a comparative analysis of the two groups across three dimensions: topics, profiles, and behavioral characteristics. The results indicate that conspiracy and control users exhibit similarity in terms of their profile metadata characteristics. However, they diverge significantly in terms of behavior and activity, particularly regarding the discussed topics, the terminology used, and their stance on trending subjects. In addition, we find no significant disparity in the presence of bot users between the two groups. Finally, we develop a classifier to identify conspiracy users using features borrowed from bot, troll and linguistic literature. The results demonstrate a high accuracy level (with an F1 score of 0.94), enabling us to uncover the most discriminating features associated with conspiracy-related accounts.

Related papers

• Labeled Datasets for Research on Information Operations [71.34999856621306]
  We present new labeled datasets about 26 campaigns, which contain both IO posts verified by a social media platform and over 13M posts by 303k accounts that discussed similar topics in the same time frames (control data) The datasets will facilitate the study of narratives, network interactions, and engagement strategies employed by coordinated accounts across various campaigns and countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T22:15:01Z)
• Unveiling Online Conspiracy Theorists: a Text-Based Approach and Characterization [42.242551342068374]
  We conducted a comprehensive analysis of two distinct X datasets: one comprising users with conspiracy theorizing patterns and another made of users lacking such tendencies. Our findings reveal marked differences in the lexicon and language adopted by conspiracy theorists with respect to other users. We developed a machine learning classifier capable of identifying users who propagate conspiracy theories based on a rich set of 871 features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T08:07:38Z)
• Classifying Conspiratorial Narratives At Scale: False Alarms and Erroneous Connections [4.594855794205588]
  This work establishes a general scheme for classifying discussions related to conspiracy theories. We leverage human-labeled ground truth to train a BERT-based model for classifying online CTs. We present the first large-scale classification study using posts from the most active conspiracy-related Reddit forums.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T20:29:12Z)
• On mission Twitter Profiles: A Study of Selective Toxic Behavior [5.0157204307764625]
  This study aims to characterize profiles potentially used for influence operations, termed 'on-mission profiles' Longitudinal data from 138K Twitter or X, profiles and 293M tweets enables profiling based on theme diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T15:42:36Z)
• Where the Earth is flat and 9/11 is an inside job: A comparative algorithm audit of conspiratorial information in web search results [62.997667081978825]
  We examine the distribution of conspiratorial information in search results across five search engines: Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo and Yandex. We find that all search engines except Google consistently displayed conspiracy-promoting results and returned links to conspiracy-dedicated websites in their top results. Most conspiracy-promoting results came from social media and conspiracy-dedicated websites while conspiracy-debunking information was shared by scientific websites and, to a lesser extent, legacy media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T14:29:21Z)
• Misleading Repurposing on Twitter [3.0254442724635173]
  We present the first in-depth and large-scale study of misleading repurposing. A malicious user changes the identity of their social media account via, among other things, changes to the profile attributes in order to use the account for a new purpose while retaining their followers. We propose a definition for the behavior and a methodology that uses supervised learning on data mined from the Internet Archive's Twitter Stream Grab to flag repurposed accounts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T20:19:01Z)
• Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment: the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
  This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic. We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content. Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
• Contrastive Examples for Addressing the Tyranny of the Majority [83.93825214500131]
  We propose to create a balanced training dataset, consisting of the original dataset plus new data points in which the group memberships are intervened. We show that current generative adversarial networks are a powerful tool for learning these data points, called contrastive examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-14T14:06:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.