Understanding the Privacy Risks of Popular Search Engine Advertising
Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15309v3
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 11:10:12 GMT
- Title: Understanding the Privacy Risks of Popular Search Engine Advertising
Systems
- Authors: Salim Chouaki, Oana Goga, Hamed Haddadi, Peter Snyder
- Abstract summary: We study the impact of clicking on search ads on three popular private search engines which have advertising-based business models: StartPage, Qwant, and DuckDuckGo.
We investigate the possibility of third parties tracking users when clicking on ads by analyzing first-party storage, redirection domain paths, and requests sent before, when, and after the clicks.
- Score: 9.706547522469666
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: We present the first extensive measurement of the privacy properties of the
advertising systems used by privacy-focused search engines. We propose an
automated methodology to study the impact of clicking on search ads on three
popular private search engines which have advertising-based business models:
StartPage, Qwant, and DuckDuckGo, and we compare them to two dominant
data-harvesting ones: Google and Bing. We investigate the possibility of third
parties tracking users when clicking on ads by analyzing first-party storage,
redirection domain paths, and requests sent before, when, and after the clicks.
Our results show that privacy-focused search engines fail to protect users'
privacy when clicking ads. Users' requests are sent through redirectors on 4%
of ad clicks on Bing, 86% of ad clicks on Qwant, and 100% of ad clicks on
Google, DuckDuckGo, and StartPage. Even worse, advertising systems collude with
advertisers across all search engines by passing unique IDs to advertisers in
most ad clicks. These IDs allow redirectors to aggregate users' activity on
ads' destination websites in addition to the activity they record when users
are redirected through them. Overall, we observe that both privacy-focused and
traditional search engines engage in privacy-harming behaviors allowing
cross-site tracking, even in privacy-enhanced browsers.
Related papers
- PriveShield: Enhancing User Privacy Using Automatic Isolated Profiles in Browsers [3.9251831157293515]
PriveShield is a light-weight privacy mechanism that disrupts the information gathering cycle.
Our evaluation results show that our extension is effective in preventing retargeted ads in 91% of those scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-03T20:29:33Z) - On the Differential Privacy and Interactivity of Privacy Sandbox Reports [78.85958224681858]
The Privacy Sandbox initiative from Google includes APIs for enabling privacy-preserving advertising functionalities.
We provide an abstract model for analyzing the privacy of these APIs and show that they satisfy a formal DP guarantee.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-22T08:22:57Z) - Fingerprinting and Tracing Shadows: The Development and Impact of Browser Fingerprinting on Digital Privacy [55.2480439325792]
Browser fingerprinting is a growing technique for identifying and tracking users online without traditional methods like cookies.
This paper gives an overview by examining the various fingerprinting techniques and analyzes the entropy and uniqueness of the collected data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-18T20:32:31Z) - Accessibility Issues in Ad-Driven Web Applications [3.9531869396416344]
Third-party advertisements (ads) are a vital revenue source for free web services, but they introduce significant accessibility challenges.
We conduct the first large-scale investigation of 430K website elements, including nearly 100K ad elements, to understand the accessibility of ads on websites.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-27T09:50:06Z) - Why am I Still Seeing This: Measuring the Effectiveness Of Ad Controls and Explanations in AI-Mediated Ad Targeting Systems [55.02903075972816]
We evaluate the effectiveness of Meta's "See less" ad control and the actionability of ad targeting explanations following the shift to AI-mediated targeting.
We find that utilizing the "See less" ad control for the topics we study does not significantly reduce the number of ads shown by Meta on these topics.
We find that the majority of ad targeting explanations for local ads made no reference to location-specific targeting criteria.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-21T18:03:11Z) - From Ad Identifiers to Global Privacy Control: The Status Quo and Future of Opting Out of Ad Tracking on Android [2.8436446946726557]
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) gives user an opt-out right via Global Privacy Control (GPC)
Our analysis shows that neither the AdID setting nor GPC effectively prevents the selling and sharing of personal information in California.
To mitigate this shortcoming, Android's AdID setting should be evolved towards a universal GPC setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-20T17:06:23Z) - Evaluating Google's Protected Audience Protocol [7.737740676767729]
Google has proposed the Privacy Sandbox initiative to enable ad targeting without third-party cookies.
This work focuses on analyzing linkage privacy risks for the reporting mechanisms proposed in the Protected Audience proposal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-13T18:28:56Z) - Characterizing Browser Fingerprinting and its Mitigations [0.0]
This work explores one of these tracking techniques: browser fingerprinting.
We detail how browser fingerprinting works, how prevalent it is, and what defenses can mitigate it.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-12T20:31:24Z) - Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising.
It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images.
We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z) - Protecting User Privacy in Online Settings via Supervised Learning [69.38374877559423]
We design an intelligent approach to online privacy protection that leverages supervised learning.
By detecting and blocking data collection that might infringe on a user's privacy, we can restore a degree of digital privacy to the user.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-06T05:20:16Z) - Privacy Explanations - A Means to End-User Trust [64.7066037969487]
We looked into how explainability might help to tackle this problem.
We created privacy explanations that aim to help to clarify to end users why and for what purposes specific data is required.
Our findings reveal that privacy explanations can be an important step towards increasing trust in software systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-18T09:30:37Z) - An Empirical Study of In-App Advertising Issues Based on Large Scale App
Review Analysis [67.58267006314415]
We present a large-scale analysis on ad-related user feedback from App Store and Google Play.
From a statistical analysis of 36,309 ad-related reviews, we find that users care most about the number of unique ads and ad display frequency during usage.
Some ad issue types are addressed more quickly by developers than other ad issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-22T05:38:24Z) - Wide-AdGraph: Detecting Ad Trackers with a Wide Dependency Chain Graph [0.2761244786307778]
Websites use third-party ads and tracking services to deliver targeted ads and collect information about users that visit them.
Most of the blocking solutions rely on crowd-sourced filter lists manually maintained by a large community of users.
In this work, we seek to simplify the update of these filter lists by combining different websites through a large-scale graph.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-29T11:28:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.