Automatic Scam-Baiting Using ChatGPT

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01586v1
• Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 13:13:35 GMT
• Title: Automatic Scam-Baiting Using ChatGPT
• Authors: Piyush Bajaj, Matthew Edwards,
• Abstract summary: We report on the results of a month-long experiment comparing the effectiveness of two ChatGPT-based automatic scam-baiters to a control measure. With engagement from over 250 real email fraudsters, we find that ChatGPT-based scam-baiters show a marked increase in scammer response rate and conversation length. We discuss the implications of these results and practical considerations for wider deployment of automatic scam-baiting.
• Score: 0.46040036610482665
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Automatic scam-baiting is an online fraud countermeasure that involves automated systems responding to online fraudsters in order to waste their time and deplete their resources, diverting attackers away from real potential victims. Previous work has demonstrated that text generation systems are capable of engaging with attackers as automatic scam-baiters, but the fluency and coherence of generated text may be a limit to the effectiveness of such systems. In this paper, we report on the results of a month-long experiment comparing the effectiveness of two ChatGPT-based automatic scam-baiters to a control measure. Within our results, with engagement from over 250 real email fraudsters, we find that ChatGPT-based scam-baiters show a marked increase in scammer response rate and conversation length relative to the control measure, outperforming previous approaches. We discuss the implications of these results and practical considerations for wider deployment of automatic scam-baiting.

Related papers

• "It Warned Me Just at the Right Moment": Exploring LLM-based Real-time Detection of Phone Scams [21.992539308179126]
  We propose a framework for modeling scam calls and introduce an LLM-based real-time detection approach. We evaluate the method's performance and analyze key factors influencing its effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T10:57:05Z)
• Exploring and Mitigating Adversarial Manipulation of Voting-Based Leaderboards [93.16294577018482]
  Arena, the most popular benchmark of this type, ranks models by asking users to select the better response between two randomly selected models. We show that an attacker can alter the leaderboard (to promote their favorite model or demote competitors) at the cost of roughly a thousand votes. Our attack consists of two steps: first, we show how an attacker can determine which model was used to generate a given reply with more than $95%$ accuracy; and then, the attacker can use this information to consistently vote against a target model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-13T17:12:38Z)
• Human-Readable Adversarial Prompts: An Investigation into LLM Vulnerabilities Using Situational Context [49.13497493053742]
  We focus on human-readable adversarial prompts, which are more realistic and potent threats. Our key contributions are (1) situation-driven attacks leveraging movie scripts as context to create human-readable prompts that successfully deceive LLMs, (2) adversarial suffix conversion to transform nonsensical adversarial suffixes into independent meaningful text, and (3) AdvPrompter with p-nucleus sampling, a method to generate diverse, human-readable adversarial suffixes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T21:43:52Z)
• Exposing LLM Vulnerabilities: Adversarial Scam Detection and Performance [16.9071617169937]
  This paper investigates the vulnerabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) when facing adversarial scam messages for the task of scam detection. We created a comprehensive dataset with fine-grained labels of scam messages, including both original and adversarial scam messages. Our analysis showed how adversarial examples took advantage of vulnerabilities of a LLM, leading to high misclassification rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-01T00:13:28Z)
• Combating Phone Scams with LLM-based Detection: Where Do We Stand? [1.8979188847659796]
  This research explores the potential of large language models (LLMs) to provide detection of fraudulent phone calls. LLMs-based detectors can identify potential scams as they occur, offering immediate protection to users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T02:14:30Z)
• Evaluating the Efficacy of Large Language Models in Identifying Phishing Attempts [2.6012482282204004]
  Phishing, a prevalent cybercrime tactic for decades, remains a significant threat in today's digital world. This paper aims to analyze the effectiveness of 15 Large Language Models (LLMs) in detecting phishing attempts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T19:55:18Z)
• Evaluating Robustness of Generative Search Engine on Adversarial Factual Questions [89.35345649303451]
  Generative search engines have the potential to transform how people seek information online. But generated responses from existing large language models (LLMs)-backed generative search engines may not always be accurate. Retrieval-augmented generation exacerbates safety concerns, since adversaries may successfully evade the entire system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T11:22:19Z)
• FRAUDability: Estimating Users' Susceptibility to Financial Fraud Using Adversarial Machine Learning [24.817067681746117]
  We propose FRAUDability, a method for the estimation of a financial fraud detection system's performance for every user. The proposed method produces scores, namely "fraudability scores," which are numerical estimations of a fraud detection system's ability to detect financial fraud for a specific user. We show that the scores can also help attackers increase their financial profit by 54%, by engaging solely with users with high fraudability scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-02T18:33:05Z)
• Unsupervised detection of coordinated fake-follower campaigns on social media [1.3035246321276739]
  We present a novel unsupervised detection method designed to target a specific category of malicious accounts. Our framework identifies anomalous following patterns among all the followers of a social media account. We find that these detected groups of anomalous followers exhibit consistent behavior across multiple accounts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T12:30:29Z)
• Active Countermeasures for Email Fraud [2.6856688022781556]
  Scam-baiters play the roles of victims, reply to scammers, and try to waste their time and attention with long and unproductive conversations. We developed and deployed an expandable scam-baiting mailserver that can conduct scam-baiting activities automatically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T21:20:13Z)
• Identification of Twitter Bots based on an Explainable ML Framework: the US 2020 Elections Case Study [72.61531092316092]
  This paper focuses on the design of a novel system for identifying Twitter bots based on labeled Twitter data. Supervised machine learning (ML) framework is adopted using an Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. Our study also deploys Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) for explaining the ML model predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T14:12:24Z)
• Deep convolutional forest: a dynamic deep ensemble approach for spam detection in text [219.15486286590016]
  This paper introduces a dynamic deep ensemble model for spam detection that adjusts its complexity and extracts features automatically. As a result, the model achieved high precision, recall, f1-score and accuracy of 98.38%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T17:19:37Z)
• Improving the Adversarial Robustness for Speaker Verification by Self-Supervised Learning [95.60856995067083]
  This work is among the first to perform adversarial defense for ASV without knowing the specific attack algorithms. We propose to perform adversarial defense from two perspectives: 1) adversarial perturbation purification and 2) adversarial perturbation detection. Experimental results show that our detection module effectively shields the ASV by detecting adversarial samples with an accuracy of around 80%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T07:10:54Z)
• Robust Text CAPTCHAs Using Adversarial Examples [129.29523847765952]
  We propose a user-friendly text-based CAPTCHA generation method named Robust Text CAPTCHA (RTC) At the first stage, the foregrounds and backgrounds are constructed with randomly sampled font and background images. At the second stage, we apply a highly transferable adversarial attack for text CAPTCHAs to better obstruct CAPTCHA solvers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-07T11:03:07Z)
• Adversarial vs behavioural-based defensive AI with joint, continual and active learning: automated evaluation of robustness to deception, poisoning and concept drift [62.997667081978825]
  Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have brought new capabilities to behavioural analysis (UEBA) for cyber-security. In this paper, we present a solution to effectively mitigate this attack by improving the detection process and efficiently leveraging human expertise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T13:54:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.