On the Actionability of Outcome Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.04470v1
• Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 17:57:31 GMT
• Title: On the Actionability of Outcome Prediction
• Authors: Lydia T. Liu, Solon Barocas, Jon Kleinberg, Karen Levy
• Abstract summary: Practitioners recognize that the ultimate goal is not just to predict but to act effectively. We ask: when are accurate predictors of outcomes helpful for identifying the most suitable intervention? We find that except in cases where there is a single decisive action for improving the outcome, outcome prediction never maximizes "action value"
• Score: 8.32379926107182
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Predicting future outcomes is a prevalent application of machine learning in social impact domains. Examples range from predicting student success in education to predicting disease risk in healthcare. Practitioners recognize that the ultimate goal is not just to predict but to act effectively. Increasing evidence suggests that relying on outcome predictions for downstream interventions may not have desired results. In most domains there exists a multitude of possible interventions for each individual, making the challenge of taking effective action more acute. Even when causal mechanisms connecting the individual's latent states to outcomes is well understood, in any given instance (a specific student or patient), practitioners still need to infer -- from budgeted measurements of latent states -- which of many possible interventions will be most effective for this individual. With this in mind, we ask: when are accurate predictors of outcomes helpful for identifying the most suitable intervention? Through a simple model encompassing actions, latent states, and measurements, we demonstrate that pure outcome prediction rarely results in the most effective policy for taking actions, even when combined with other measurements. We find that except in cases where there is a single decisive action for improving the outcome, outcome prediction never maximizes "action value", the utility of taking actions. Making measurements of actionable latent states, where specific actions lead to desired outcomes, considerably enhances the action value compared to outcome prediction, and the degree of improvement depends on action costs and the outcome model. This analysis emphasizes the need to go beyond generic outcome prediction in interventional settings by incorporating knowledge of plausible actions and latent states.

Related papers

• Performative Prediction on Games and Mechanism Design [69.7933059664256]
  We study a collective risk dilemma where agents decide whether to trust predictions based on past accuracy. As predictions shape collective outcomes, social welfare arises naturally as a metric of concern. We show how to achieve better trade-offs and use them for mechanism design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T16:03:44Z)
• Reduced-Rank Multi-objective Policy Learning and Optimization [57.978477569678844]
  In practice, causal researchers do not have a single outcome in mind a priori. In government-assisted social benefit programs, policymakers collect many outcomes to understand the multidimensional nature of poverty. We present a data-driven dimensionality-reduction methodology for multiple outcomes in the context of optimal policy learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T08:16:30Z)
• Zero-shot causal learning [64.9368337542558]
  CaML is a causal meta-learning framework which formulates the personalized prediction of each intervention's effect as a task. We show that CaML is able to predict the personalized effects of novel interventions that do not exist at the time of training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-28T20:14:11Z)
• Inferring Effect Ordering Without Causal Effect Estimation [1.6114012813668932]
  Predictive models are often employed to guide interventions across various domains, such as advertising, customer retention, and personalized medicine. Our paper addresses the question of when and how these predictive models can be interpreted causally. We formalize two assumptions, full latent mediation and latent monotonicity, that are jointly sufficient for inferring effect ordering without direct causal effect estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-25T02:15:22Z)
• What Should I Know? Using Meta-gradient Descent for Predictive Feature Discovery in a Single Stream of Experience [63.75363908696257]
  computational reinforcement learning seeks to construct an agent's perception of the world through predictions of future sensations. An open challenge in this line of work is determining from the infinitely many predictions that the agent could possibly make which predictions might best support decision-making. We introduce a meta-gradient descent process by which an agent learns what predictions to make, 2) the estimates for its chosen predictions, and 3) how to use those estimates to generate policies that maximize future reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-13T21:31:06Z)
• Counterfactual Predictions under Runtime Confounding [74.90756694584839]
  We study the counterfactual prediction task in the setting where all relevant factors are captured in the historical data. We propose a doubly-robust procedure for learning counterfactual prediction models in this setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-30T15:49:05Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)
• Regret Minimization for Causal Inference on Large Treatment Space [21.957539112375496]
  We propose a network architecture and a regularizer that extracts a debiased representation from biased observational data. Our proposed loss minimizes a classification error of whether or not the action is relatively good for the individual target.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T02:19:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.