Inferring Effect Ordering Without Causal Effect Estimation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.12532v5
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 13:38:10 GMT
• Title: Inferring Effect Ordering Without Causal Effect Estimation
• Authors: Carlos Fernández-Loría, Jorge Loría,
• Abstract summary: Predictive models are often employed to guide interventions across various domains, such as advertising, customer retention, and personalized medicine. Our paper addresses the question of when and how these predictive models can be interpreted causally. We formalize two assumptions, full latent mediation and latent monotonicity, that are jointly sufficient for inferring effect ordering without direct causal effect estimation.
• Score: 1.6114012813668932
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Predictive models are often employed to guide interventions across various domains, such as advertising, customer retention, and personalized medicine. These models often do not estimate the actual effects of interventions but serve as proxies, suggesting potential effectiveness based on predicted outcomes. Our paper addresses the critical question of when and how these predictive models can be interpreted causally, specifically focusing on using the models for inferring effect ordering rather than precise effect sizes. We formalize two assumptions, full latent mediation and latent monotonicity, that are jointly sufficient for inferring effect ordering without direct causal effect estimation. We explore the utility of these assumptions in assessing the feasibility of proxies for inferring effect ordering in scenarios where there is no data on how individuals behave when intervened or no data on the primary outcome of interest. Additionally, we provide practical guidelines for practitioners to make their own assessments about proxies. Our findings reveal not only when it is possible to reasonably infer effect ordering from proxies, but also conditions under which modeling these proxies can outperform direct effect estimation. This study underscores the importance of broadening causal inference to encompass alternative causal interpretations beyond effect estimation, offering a foundation for future research to enhance decision-making processes when direct effect estimation is not feasible.

Related papers

• Performative Prediction on Games and Mechanism Design [69.7933059664256]
  We study a collective risk dilemma where agents decide whether to trust predictions based on past accuracy. As predictions shape collective outcomes, social welfare arises naturally as a metric of concern. We show how to achieve better trade-offs and use them for mechanism design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T16:03:44Z)
• Causal Fine-Tuning and Effect Calibration of Non-Causal Predictive Models [1.3124513975412255]
  This paper proposes techniques to enhance the performance of non-causal models for causal inference using data from randomized experiments. In domains like advertising, customer retention, and precision medicine, non-causal models that predict outcomes under no intervention are often used to score individuals and rank them according to the expected effectiveness of an intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T20:18:16Z)
• Automating the Selection of Proxy Variables of Unmeasured Confounders [16.773841751009748]
  We extend the existing proxy variable estimator to accommodate scenarios where multiple unmeasured confounders exist between the treatments and the outcome. We propose two data-driven methods for the selection of proxy variables and for the unbiased estimation of causal effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T08:53:49Z)
• Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
  Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)
• On the Actionability of Outcome Prediction [8.32379926107182]
  Practitioners recognize that the ultimate goal is not just to predict but to act effectively. We ask: when are accurate predictors of outcomes helpful for identifying the most suitable intervention? We find that except in cases where there is a single decisive action for improving the outcome, outcome prediction never maximizes "action value"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-08T17:57:31Z)
• Doubly Robust Estimation of Direct and Indirect Quantile Treatment Effects with Machine Learning [0.0]
  We suggest a machine learning estimator of direct and indirect quantile treatment effects under a selection-on-observables assumption. The proposed method is based on the efficient score functions of the cumulative distribution functions of potential outcomes. We also propose a multiplier bootstrap for statistical inference and show the validity of the multiplier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-03T14:27:15Z)
• Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
  We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks. The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data. Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z)
• Disentangled Representation for Causal Mediation Analysis [25.114619307838602]
  Causal mediation analysis is a method that is often used to reveal direct and indirect effects. Deep learning shows promise in mediation analysis, but the current methods only assume latent confounders that affect treatment, mediator and outcome simultaneously. We propose the Disentangled Mediation Analysis Variational AutoEncoder (DMAVAE), which disentangles the representations of latent confounders into three types to accurately estimate the natural direct effect, natural indirect effect and total effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T23:37:17Z)
• Zero-shot causal learning [64.9368337542558]
  CaML is a causal meta-learning framework which formulates the personalized prediction of each intervention's effect as a task. We show that CaML is able to predict the personalized effects of novel interventions that do not exist at the time of training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-28T20:14:11Z)
• Neighborhood Adaptive Estimators for Causal Inference under Network Interference [152.4519491244279]
  We consider the violation of the classical no-interference assumption, meaning that the treatment of one individuals might affect the outcomes of another. To make interference tractable, we consider a known network that describes how interference may travel. We study estimators for the average direct treatment effect on the treated in such a setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-07T14:53:47Z)
• Counterfactual Predictions under Runtime Confounding [74.90756694584839]
  We study the counterfactual prediction task in the setting where all relevant factors are captured in the historical data. We propose a doubly-robust procedure for learning counterfactual prediction models in this setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-30T15:49:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.