Conditional validity of heteroskedastic conformal regression
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.08313v2
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:29:45 GMT
- Title: Conditional validity of heteroskedastic conformal regression
- Authors: Nicolas Dewolf, Bernard De Baets, Willem Waegeman,
- Abstract summary: Conformal prediction and split conformal prediction offer a distribution-free approach to estimating prediction intervals with statistical guarantees.
Recent work has shown that split conformal prediction can produce state-of-the-art prediction intervals when focusing on marginal coverage.
This paper tries to shed new light on how prediction intervals can be constructed, using methods such as normalized and Mondrian conformal prediction.
- Score: 12.905195278168506
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Conformal prediction, and split conformal prediction as a specific implementation, offer a distribution-free approach to estimating prediction intervals with statistical guarantees. Recent work has shown that split conformal prediction can produce state-of-the-art prediction intervals when focusing on marginal coverage, i.e. on a calibration dataset the method produces on average prediction intervals that contain the ground truth with a predefined coverage level. However, such intervals are often not adaptive, which can be problematic for regression problems with heteroskedastic noise. This paper tries to shed new light on how prediction intervals can be constructed, using methods such as normalized and Mondrian conformal prediction, in such a way that they adapt to the heteroskedasticity of the underlying process. Theoretical and experimental results are presented in which these methods are compared in a systematic way. In particular, it is shown how the conditional validity of a chosen conformal predictor can be related to (implicit) assumptions about the data-generating distribution.
Related papers
- Conformalized Interval Arithmetic with Symmetric Calibration [9.559062601251464]
We develop conformal prediction intervals for single target to the prediction interval for sum of multiple targets.
We show that our method outperforms existing conformalized approaches as well as non-conformal approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-20T15:27:18Z) - Probabilistic Conformal Prediction with Approximate Conditional Validity [81.30551968980143]
We develop a new method for generating prediction sets that combines the flexibility of conformal methods with an estimate of the conditional distribution.
Our method consistently outperforms existing approaches in terms of conditional coverage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T20:44:48Z) - Self-Calibrating Conformal Prediction [16.606421967131524]
We introduce Self-Calibrating Conformal Prediction to deliver calibrated point predictions alongside prediction intervals with finite-sample validity conditional on these predictions.
We show that our method improves calibrated interval efficiency through model calibration and offers a practical alternative to feature-conditional validity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-11T21:12:21Z) - When Rigidity Hurts: Soft Consistency Regularization for Probabilistic
Hierarchical Time Series Forecasting [69.30930115236228]
Probabilistic hierarchical time-series forecasting is an important variant of time-series forecasting.
Most methods focus on point predictions and do not provide well-calibrated probabilistic forecasts distributions.
We propose PROFHiT, a fully probabilistic hierarchical forecasting model that jointly models forecast distribution of entire hierarchy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-17T20:30:16Z) - Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty via Inference-Time Sampling [57.749601811982096]
We propose a post-hoc sampling strategy for estimating predictive uncertainty accounting for data ambiguity.
The method can generate different plausible outputs for a given input and does not assume parametric forms of predictive distributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-03T12:43:21Z) - Distribution-Free Finite-Sample Guarantees and Split Conformal
Prediction [0.0]
split conformal prediction represents a promising avenue to obtain finite-sample guarantees under minimal distribution-free assumptions.
We highlight the connection between split conformal prediction and classical tolerance predictors developed in the 1940s.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-26T14:12:24Z) - Predictive Inference with Feature Conformal Prediction [80.77443423828315]
We propose feature conformal prediction, which extends the scope of conformal prediction to semantic feature spaces.
From a theoretical perspective, we demonstrate that feature conformal prediction provably outperforms regular conformal prediction under mild assumptions.
Our approach could be combined with not only vanilla conformal prediction, but also other adaptive conformal prediction methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-01T02:57:37Z) - CovarianceNet: Conditional Generative Model for Correct Covariance
Prediction in Human Motion Prediction [71.31516599226606]
We present a new method to correctly predict the uncertainty associated with the predicted distribution of future trajectories.
Our approach, CovariaceNet, is based on a Conditional Generative Model with Gaussian latent variables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-07T09:38:24Z) - Conformal histogram regression [15.153110906331737]
This paper develops a conformal method to compute prediction intervals for non-parametric regression that can automatically adapt to skewed data.
Leveraging black-box machine learning algorithms, it translates their output into the shortest prediction intervals with approximate conditional coverage.
The resulting prediction intervals provably have marginal coverage in finite samples, while achieving conditional coverage and optimal length if the black-box model is consistent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-18T18:05:02Z) - Balance-Subsampled Stable Prediction [55.13512328954456]
We propose a novel balance-subsampled stable prediction (BSSP) algorithm based on the theory of fractional factorial design.
A design-theoretic analysis shows that the proposed method can reduce the confounding effects among predictors induced by the distribution shift.
Numerical experiments on both synthetic and real-world data sets demonstrate that our BSSP algorithm significantly outperforms the baseline methods for stable prediction across unknown test data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-08T07:01:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.