Analyzing Character and Consciousness in AI-Generated Social Content: A
Case Study of Chirper, the AI Social Network
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.08614v1
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 15:40:18 GMT
- Title: Analyzing Character and Consciousness in AI-Generated Social Content: A
Case Study of Chirper, the AI Social Network
- Authors: Jianwei Luo
- Abstract summary: The study embarks on a comprehensive exploration of AI behavior, analyzing the effects of diverse settings on Chirper's responses.
Through a series of cognitive tests, the study gauges the self-awareness and pattern recognition prowess of Chirpers.
An intriguing aspect of the research is the exploration of the potential influence of a Chirper's handle or personality type on its performance.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper delves into an intricate analysis of the character and
consciousness of AI entities, with a particular focus on Chirpers within the AI
social network. At the forefront of this research is the introduction of novel
testing methodologies, including the Influence index and Struggle Index Test,
which offers a fresh lens for evaluating specific facets of AI behavior. The
study embarks on a comprehensive exploration of AI behavior, analyzing the
effects of diverse settings on Chirper's responses, thereby shedding light on
the intricate mechanisms steering AI reactions in different contexts.
Leveraging the state-of-the-art BERT model, the research assesses AI's ability
to discern its own output, presenting a pioneering approach to understanding
self-recognition in AI systems. Through a series of cognitive tests, the study
gauges the self-awareness and pattern recognition prowess of Chirpers.
Preliminary results indicate that Chirpers exhibit a commendable degree of
self-recognition and self-awareness. However, the question of consciousness in
these AI entities remains a topic of debate. An intriguing aspect of the
research is the exploration of the potential influence of a Chirper's handle or
personality type on its performance. While initial findings suggest a possible
impact, it isn't pronounced enough to form concrete conclusions. This study
stands as a significant contribution to the discourse on AI consciousness,
underscoring the imperative for continued research to unravel the full spectrum
of AI capabilities and the ramifications they hold for future human-AI
interactions.
Related papers
- The Phenomenology of Machine: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Sentience of the OpenAI-o1 Model Integrating Functionalism, Consciousness Theories, Active Inference, and AI Architectures [0.0]
The OpenAI-o1 model is a transformer-based AI trained with reinforcement learning from human feedback.
We investigate how RLHF influences the model's internal reasoning processes, potentially giving rise to consciousness-like experiences.
Our findings suggest that the OpenAI-o1 model shows aspects of consciousness, while acknowledging the ongoing debates surrounding AI sentience.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-18T06:06:13Z) - Responsible AI: Portraits with Intelligent Bibliometrics [30.51687434548628]
This study defined responsible AI and identified its core principles.
Empirically, this study investigated 17,799 research articles contributed by the AI community since 2015.
An analysis of a core cohort comprising 380 articles from multiple disciplines captures the most recent advancements in responsible AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-05T08:40:22Z) - Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs)
It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures.
The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z) - Advancing Explainable AI Toward Human-Like Intelligence: Forging the
Path to Artificial Brain [0.7770029179741429]
The intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and neuroscience in Explainable AI (XAI) is pivotal for enhancing transparency and interpretability in complex decision-making processes.
This paper explores the evolution of XAI methodologies, ranging from feature-based to human-centric approaches.
The challenges in achieving explainability in generative models, ensuring responsible AI practices, and addressing ethical implications are discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-07T14:09:11Z) - Advancing Perception in Artificial Intelligence through Principles of
Cognitive Science [6.637438611344584]
We focus on the cognitive functions of perception, which is the process of taking signals from one's surroundings as input, and processing them to understand the environment.
We present a collection of methods in AI for researchers to build AI systems inspired by cognitive science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T01:21:55Z) - The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and
Strategies [97.5153823429076]
The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed.
The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z) - From Psychological Curiosity to Artificial Curiosity: Curiosity-Driven
Learning in Artificial Intelligence Tasks [56.20123080771364]
Psychological curiosity plays a significant role in human intelligence to enhance learning through exploration and information acquisition.
In the Artificial Intelligence (AI) community, artificial curiosity provides a natural intrinsic motivation for efficient learning.
CDL has become increasingly popular, where agents are self-motivated to learn novel knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-20T17:07:03Z) - Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and
Stir" [76.44130385507894]
This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices.
Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - Thinking Fast and Slow in AI [38.8581204791644]
This paper proposes a research direction to advance AI which draws inspiration from cognitive theories of human decision making.
The premise is that if we gain insights about the causes of some human capabilities that are still lacking in AI, we may obtain similar capabilities in an AI system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-12T20:10:05Z) - A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented.
This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.