Development of a Deep Learning Method to Identify Acute Ischemic Stroke Lesions on Brain CT

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.17320v1
• Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 15:28:16 GMT
• Title: Development of a Deep Learning Method to Identify Acute Ischemic Stroke Lesions on Brain CT
• Authors: Alessandro Fontanella, Wenwen Li, Grant Mair, Antreas Antoniou, Eleanor Platt, Paul Armitage, Emanuele Trucco, Joanna Wardlaw, Amos Storkey
• Abstract summary: Deep learning techniques can provide automated CT brain scan assessment, but usually require annotated images. We designed a convolutional neural network-based DL algorithm using routinely-collected CT brain scans from the Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3) Our best-performing DL method achieved 72% accuracy for lesion presence and side.
• Score: 38.06921198677509
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Computed Tomography (CT) is commonly used to image acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, but its interpretation by radiologists is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. Deep learning (DL) techniques can provide automated CT brain scan assessment, but usually require annotated images. Aiming to develop a DL method for AIS using labelled but not annotated CT brain scans from patients with AIS, we designed a convolutional neural network-based DL algorithm using routinely-collected CT brain scans from the Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3), which were not acquired using strict research protocols. The DL model aimed to detect AIS lesions and classify the side of the brain affected. We explored the impact of AIS lesion features, background brain appearances, and timing on DL performance. From 5772 unique CT scans of 2347 AIS patients (median age 82), 54% had visible AIS lesions according to expert labelling. Our best-performing DL method achieved 72% accuracy for lesion presence and side. Lesions that were larger (80% accuracy) or multiple (87% accuracy for two lesions, 100% for three or more), were better detected. Follow-up scans had 76% accuracy, while baseline scans 67% accuracy. Chronic brain conditions reduced accuracy, particularly non-stroke lesions and old stroke lesions (32% and 31% error rates respectively). DL methods can be designed for AIS lesion detection on CT using the vast quantities of routinely-collected CT brain scan data. Ultimately, this should lead to more robust and widely-applicable methods.

Related papers

• Weakly-Supervised Detection of Bone Lesions in CT [48.34559062736031]
  The skeletal region is one of the common sites of metastatic spread of cancer in the breast and prostate. We developed a pipeline to detect bone lesions in CT volumes via a proxy segmentation task. Our method detected bone lesions in CT with a precision of 96.7% and recall of 47.3% despite the use of incomplete and partial training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T21:05:34Z)
• Enhancing mTBI Diagnosis with Residual Triplet Convolutional Neural Network Using 3D CT [1.0621519762024807]
  We introduce an innovative approach to enhance mTBI diagnosis using 3D Computed Tomography (CT) images. We propose a Residual Triplet Convolutional Neural Network (RTCNN) model to distinguish between mTBI cases and healthy ones. Our RTCNN model shows promising performance in mTBI diagnosis, achieving an average accuracy of 94.3%, a sensitivity of 94.1%, and a specificity of 95.2%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T20:41:46Z)
• Liver Tumor Screening and Diagnosis in CT with Pixel-Lesion-Patient Network [37.931408083443074]
  Pixel-Lesion-pAtient Network (PLAN) is proposed to jointly segment and classify each lesion with improved anchor queries and a foreground-enhanced sampling loss. PLAN achieves 95% and 96% in patient-level sensitivity and specificity. On contrast-enhanced CT, our lesion-level detection precision, recall, and classification accuracy are 92%, 89%, and 86%, outperforming widely used CNN and transformers for lesion segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T06:21:45Z)
• Are Macula or Optic Nerve Head Structures better at Diagnosing Glaucoma? An Answer using AI and Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography [48.7576911714538]
  We developed a deep learning algorithm to automatically segment structures of the optic nerve head (ONH) and macula in 3D wide-field OCT scans. Our classification algorithm was able to segment ONH and macular tissues with a DC of 0.94 $pm$ 0.003. This may encourage the mainstream adoption of 3D wide-field OCT scans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T01:51:29Z)
• 3D Structural Analysis of the Optic Nerve Head to Robustly Discriminate Between Papilledema and Optic Disc Drusen [44.754910718620295]
  We developed a deep learning algorithm to identify major tissue structures of the optic nerve head (ONH) in 3D optical coherence tomography ( OCT) scans. A classification algorithm was designed using 150 OCT volumes to perform 3-class classifications (1: ODD, 2: papilledema, 3: healthy) strictly from their drusen and prelamina swelling scores. Our AI approach accurately discriminated ODD from papilledema, using a single OCT scan.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-18T17:05:53Z)
• Effect of Input Size on the Classification of Lung Nodules Using Convolutional Neural Networks [0.12891210250935145]
  Lung cancer screening using annual low-dose computed tomography (CT) reduces lung cancer mortality by 20% compared to traditional chest radiography. The number of slices in a CT scan can be up to 600. Therefore, computer-aided-detection (CAD) systems are very important for faster and more accurate assessment of the data. In this study, we proposed a framework that analyzes CT lung screenings using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to reduce false positives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-11T16:52:30Z)
• Deep Lesion Tracker: Monitoring Lesions in 4D Longitudinal Imaging Studies [19.890200389017213]
  Deep lesion tracker (DLT) is a deep learning approach that uses both appearance- and anatomical-based signals. We release the first lesion tracking benchmark, consisting of 3891 lesion pairs from the public DeepLesion database. DLT generalizes well on an external clinical test set of 100 longitudinal studies, achieving 88% accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-09T05:23:46Z)
• Identification of Ischemic Heart Disease by using machine learning technique based on parameters measuring Heart Rate Variability [50.591267188664666]
  In this study, 18 non-invasive features (age, gender, left ventricular ejection fraction and 15 obtained from HRV) of 243 subjects were used to train and validate a series of several ANN. The best result was obtained using 7 input parameters and 7 hidden nodes with an accuracy of 98.9% and 82% for the training and validation dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-29T19:14:41Z)
• Deep Sequential Learning for Cervical Spine Fracture Detection on Computed Tomography Imaging [20.051649556262216]
  We propose a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) with a bidirectional long-short term memory (BLSTM) layer for the automated detection of cervical spine fractures in CT axial images. We used an annotated dataset of 3,666 CT scans (729 positive and 2,937 negative cases) to train and validate the model. The validation results show a classification accuracy of 70.92% and 79.18% on the balanced (104 positive and 104 negative cases) and imbalanced (104 positive and 419 negative cases) test datasets, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T04:36:29Z)
• Classification of COVID-19 in CT Scans using Multi-Source Transfer Learning [91.3755431537592]
  We propose the use of Multi-Source Transfer Learning to improve upon traditional Transfer Learning for the classification of COVID-19 from CT scans. With our multi-source fine-tuning approach, our models outperformed baseline models fine-tuned with ImageNet. Our best performing model was able to achieve an accuracy of 0.893 and a Recall score of 0.897, outperforming its baseline Recall score by 9.3%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-22T11:53:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.