A Prefrontal Cortex-inspired Architecture for Planning in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00194v3
• Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 03:24:45 GMT
• Title: A Prefrontal Cortex-inspired Architecture for Planning in Large Language Models
• Authors: Taylor Webb, Shanka Subhra Mondal, Chi Wang, Brian Krabach, Ida Momennejad
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with tasks that require multi-step reasoning or goal-directed planning. We take inspiration from the human brain, in which planning is accomplished via the recurrent interaction of specialized modules in the prefrontal cortex (PFC)
• Score: 16.475564538598768
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive performance on a wide variety of tasks, but they often struggle with tasks that require multi-step reasoning or goal-directed planning. To address this, we take inspiration from the human brain, in which planning is accomplished via the recurrent interaction of specialized modules in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). These modules perform functions such as conflict monitoring, state prediction, state evaluation, task decomposition, and task coordination. We find that LLMs are sometimes capable of carrying out these functions in isolation, but struggle to autonomously coordinate them in the service of a goal. Therefore, we propose a black box architecture with multiple LLM-based (GPT-4) modules. The architecture improves planning through the interaction of specialized PFC-inspired modules that break down a larger problem into multiple brief automated calls to the LLM. We evaluate the combined architecture on three challenging planning tasks -- graph traversal, Tower of Hanoi, and logistics -- finding that it yields significant improvements over standard LLM methods (e.g., zero-shot prompting, in-context learning, and chain-of-thought). These results demonstrate the benefit of utilizing knowledge from cognitive neuroscience to improve planning in LLMs.

Related papers

• PLAN-TUNING: Post-Training Language Models to Learn Step-by-Step Planning for Complex Problem Solving [66.42260489147617]
  We introduce PLAN-TUNING, a framework that distills synthetic task decompositions from large-scale language models.<n>Plan-TUNING fine-tunes smaller models via supervised and reinforcement-learning objectives to improve complex reasoning.<n>Our analysis demonstrates how planning trajectories improves complex reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T07:30:44Z)
• Planning without Search: Refining Frontier LLMs with Offline Goal-Conditioned RL [62.984693936073974]
  Large language models (LLMs) excel in tasks like question answering and dialogue.<n>Complex tasks requiring interaction, such as negotiation and persuasion, require additional long-horizon reasoning and planning.<n>We propose a novel approach that uses goal-conditioned value functions to guide the reasoning of LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T16:51:54Z)
• Enhancing Multi-Agent Systems via Reinforcement Learning with LLM-based Planner and Graph-based Policy [31.041340552853004]
  Graph Collaboration MARL (LGC-MARL) is a framework that efficiently combines Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) LGC-MARL decomposes complex tasks into executable subtasks and achieves efficient collaboration among multiple agents through graph-based coordination. Experimental results on the AI2-THOR simulation platform demonstrate the superior performance and scalability of LGC-MARL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T05:02:49Z)
• Query-Efficient Planning with Language Models [8.136901056728945]
  Planning in complex environments requires an agent to efficiently query a world model to find a sequence of actions from start to goal. Recent work has shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) can potentially help with planning by searching over promising states and adapting to feedback from the world. We show that while both approaches improve upon comparable baselines, using an LLM as a generative planner results in significantly fewer interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T02:51:21Z)
• MTMT: Consolidating Multiple Thinking Modes to Form a Thought Tree for Strengthening LLM [15.687878949848182]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown limitations in tasks requiring complex logical reasoning and multi-step problem-solving. We introduce MTMT (Multi-thinking Modes Tree), a novel method that interacts with LLMs to construct a thought tree. We evaluate the performance of MTMT under different parameter configurations, using GPT-4o mini as the base model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T09:05:30Z)
• Interactive and Expressive Code-Augmented Planning with Large Language Models [62.799579304821826]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong abilities in common-sense reasoning and interactive decision-making. Recent techniques have sought to structure LLM outputs using control flow and other code-adjacent techniques to improve planning performance. We propose REPL-Plan, an LLM planning approach that is fully code-expressive and dynamic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T04:23:17Z)
• Scaling Up Natural Language Understanding for Multi-Robots Through the Lens of Hierarchy [8.180994118420053]
  Long-horizon planning is hindered by challenges such as uncertainty accumulation, computational complexity, delayed rewards and incomplete information. This work proposes an approach to exploit the task hierarchy from human instructions to facilitate multi-robot planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T14:46:13Z)
• Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Models [57.23454975238014]
  This work lays the foundations for improving planning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We construct a comprehensive benchmark suite encompassing both classical planning benchmarks and natural language scenarios. We investigate the use of many-shot in-context learning to enhance LLM planning, exploring the relationship between increased context length and improved planning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T22:57:06Z)
• A Human-Like Reasoning Framework for Multi-Phases Planning Task with Large Language Models [15.874604623294427]
  Multi-Phases planning problem involves multiple interconnected stages, such as outlining, information gathering, and planning. Existing reasoning approaches have struggled to effectively address this complex task. Our research aims to address this challenge by developing a human-like planning framework for LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T14:13:32Z)
• Planning with Multi-Constraints via Collaborative Language Agents [13.550774629515843]
  This paper introduces Planning with Multi-Constraints (PMC), a zero-shot methodology for collaborative multi-agent systems. PMC simplifies complex task planning with constraints by decomposing it into a hierarchy of subordinate tasks. PMC achieved an average 42.68% success rate on TravelPlanner, significantly higher than GPT-4 (2.92%), and outperforming GPT-4 with ReAct on API-Bank by 13.64%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T10:33:17Z)
• Towards Efficient LLM Grounding for Embodied Multi-Agent Collaboration [70.09561665520043]
  We propose a novel framework for multi-agent collaboration that introduces Reinforced Advantage feedback (ReAd) for efficient self-refinement of plans. We provide theoretical analysis by extending advantage-weighted regression in reinforcement learning to multi-agent systems. Experiments on Over-AI and a difficult variant of RoCoBench show that ReAd surpasses baselines in success rate, and also significantly decreases the interaction steps of agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T08:33:19Z)
• Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey [98.82513390811148]
  This survey provides the first systematic view of LLM-based agents planning, covering recent works aiming to improve planning ability. Comprehensive analyses are conducted for each direction, and further challenges in the field of research are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T04:25:24Z)
• Small LLMs Are Weak Tool Learners: A Multi-LLM Agent [73.54562551341454]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents significantly extend the capabilities of standalone LLMs. We propose a novel approach that decomposes the aforementioned capabilities into a planner, caller, and summarizer. This modular framework facilitates individual updates and the potential use of smaller LLMs for building each capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-14T16:17:07Z)
• ADaPT: As-Needed Decomposition and Planning with Language Models [131.063805299796]
  We introduce As-Needed Decomposition and Planning for complex Tasks (ADaPT) ADaPT explicitly plans and decomposes complex sub-tasks as-needed, when the Large Language Models is unable to execute them. Our results demonstrate that ADaPT substantially outperforms established strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T17:59:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.