LLM-as-a-tutor in EFL Writing Education: Focusing on Evaluation of Student-LLM Interaction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05191v2
• Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 06:24:32 GMT
• Title: LLM-as-a-tutor in EFL Writing Education: Focusing on Evaluation of Student-LLM Interaction
• Authors: Jieun Han, Haneul Yoo, Junho Myung, Minsun Kim, Hyunseung Lim, Yoonsu Kim, Tak Yeon Lee, Hwajung Hong, Juho Kim, So-Yeon Ahn, Alice Oh,
• Abstract summary: In the context of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing education, LLM-as-a-tutor can assist students by providing real-time feedback on their essays. To bridge this gap, we integrate pedagogical principles to assess student-LLM interaction.
• Score: 40.76665188171691
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: In the context of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing education, LLM-as-a-tutor can assist students by providing real-time feedback on their essays. However, challenges arise in assessing LLM-as-a-tutor due to differing standards between educational and general use cases. To bridge this gap, we integrate pedagogical principles to assess student-LLM interaction. First, we explore how LLMs can function as English tutors, providing effective essay feedback tailored to students. Second, we propose three metrics to evaluate LLM-as-a-tutor specifically designed for EFL writing education, emphasizing pedagogical aspects. In this process, EFL experts evaluate the feedback from LLM-as-a-tutor regarding quality and characteristics. On the other hand, EFL learners assess their learning outcomes from interaction with LLM-as-a-tutor. This approach lays the groundwork for developing LLMs-as-a-tutor tailored to the needs of EFL learners, advancing the effectiveness of writing education in this context.

Related papers

• LLM-Driven Learning Analytics Dashboard for Teachers in EFL Writing Education [37.904037443211905]
  dashboard facilitates the analysis of student interactions with an essay writing system, which integrates ChatGPT for real-time feedback. By combining insights from NLP and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), this study demonstrates how a human-centered approach can enhance the effectiveness of teacher dashboards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T07:46:11Z)
• Exploring Knowledge Tracing in Tutor-Student Dialogues [53.52699766206808]
  We present a first attempt at performing knowledge tracing (KT) in tutor-student dialogues. We propose methods to identify the knowledge components/skills involved in each dialogue turn. We then apply a range of KT methods on the resulting labeled data to track student knowledge levels over an entire dialogue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T22:31:39Z)
• Large Language Model as an Assignment Evaluator: Insights, Feedback, and Challenges in a 1000+ Student Course [49.296957552006226]
  Using large language models (LLMs) for automatic evaluation has become an important evaluation method in NLP research. This report shares how we use GPT-4 as an automatic assignment evaluator in a university course with 1,028 students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T00:17:24Z)
• I don't trust you (anymore)! -- The effect of students' LLM use on Lecturer-Student-Trust in Higher Education [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in platforms like Open AI's ChatGPT, has led to their rapid adoption among university students. This study addresses the research question: How does the use of LLMs by students impact Informational and Procedural Justice, influencing Team Trust and Expected Team Performance? Our findings indicate that lecturers are less concerned about the fairness of LLM use per se but are more focused on the transparency of student utilization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T05:35:57Z)
• The Life Cycle of Large Language Models: A Review of Biases in Education [3.8757867335422485]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in educational contexts to provide personalized support to students and teachers. The integration of LLMs in education technology has renewed concerns over algorithmic bias which may exacerbate educational inequities. This review aims to clarify the complex nature of bias in LLM applications and provide practical guidance for their evaluation to promote educational equity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T18:00:28Z)
• Toward Self-Improvement of LLMs via Imagination, Searching, and Criticizing [56.75702900542643]
  We introduce AlphaLLM for the self-improvements of Large Language Models. It integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with LLMs to establish a self-improving loop. Our experimental results show that AlphaLLM significantly enhances the performance of LLMs without additional annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T15:21:34Z)
• Student Perspectives on Using a Large Language Model (LLM) for an Assignment on Professional Ethics [0.0]
  The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) started a serious discussion among educators on how they would affect curricula, assessments, and students' competencies. This report presents an assignment within a course on professional competencies, including some related to ethics, that computing master's students need in their careers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T09:03:47Z)
• When LLMs Meet Cunning Texts: A Fallacy Understanding Benchmark for Large Language Models [59.84769254832941]
  We propose a FaLlacy Understanding Benchmark (FLUB) containing cunning texts that are easy for humans to understand but difficult for models to grasp. Specifically, the cunning texts that FLUB focuses on mainly consist of the tricky, humorous, and misleading texts collected from the real internet environment. Based on FLUB, we investigate the performance of multiple representative and advanced LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T22:12:53Z)
• A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models [87.60417393701331]
  Large language models (LLMs) are gaining increasing popularity in both academia and industry. This paper focuses on three key dimensions: what to evaluate, where to evaluate, and how to evaluate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T16:28:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.