A Comprehensive Evaluation of Tool-Assisted Generation Strategies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10062v2
• Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 15:41:35 GMT
• Title: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Tool-Assisted Generation Strategies
• Authors: Alon Jacovi, Avi Caciularu, Jonathan Herzig, Roee Aharoni, Bernd Bohnet, Mor Geva
• Abstract summary: A growing area of research investigates augmenting language models with tools to overcome their shortcomings. Various few-shot tool-usage strategies have been proposed, but there is no systematic and fair comparison. Our findings suggest that few-shot tool integration is still an open challenge.
• Score: 39.30954697422296
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: A growing area of research investigates augmenting language models with tools (e.g., search engines, calculators) to overcome their shortcomings (e.g., missing or incorrect knowledge, incorrect logical inferences). Various few-shot tool-usage strategies have been proposed. However, there is no systematic and fair comparison across different strategies, or between these strategies and strong baselines that do not leverage tools. We conduct an extensive empirical analysis, finding that (1) across various datasets, example difficulty levels, and models, strong no-tool baselines are competitive to tool-assisted strategies, implying that effectively using tools with in-context demonstrations is a difficult unsolved problem; (2) for knowledge-retrieval tasks, strategies that *refine* incorrect outputs with tools outperform strategies that retrieve relevant information *ahead of* or *during generation*; (3) tool-assisted strategies are expensive in the number of tokens they require to work -- incurring additional costs by orders of magnitude -- which does not translate into significant improvement in performance. Overall, our findings suggest that few-shot tool integration is still an open challenge, emphasizing the need for comprehensive evaluations of future strategies to accurately assess their *benefits* and *costs*.

Related papers

• Query Routing for Homogeneous Tools: An Instantiation in the RAG Scenario [62.615210194004106]
  Current research on tool learning primarily focuses on selecting the most effective tool from a wide array of options, often overlooking cost-effectiveness. In this paper, we address the selection of homogeneous tools by predicting both their performance and the associated cost required to accomplish a given task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T09:24:09Z)
• Towards Completeness-Oriented Tool Retrieval for Large Language Models [60.733557487886635]
  Real-world systems often incorporate a wide array of tools, making it impractical to input all tools into Large Language Models. Existing tool retrieval methods primarily focus on semantic matching between user queries and tool descriptions. We propose a novel modelagnostic COllaborative Learning-based Tool Retrieval approach, COLT, which captures not only the semantic similarities between user queries and tool descriptions but also takes into account the collaborative information of tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T06:41:23Z)
• What Are Tools Anyway? A Survey from the Language Model Perspective [67.18843218893416]
  Language models (LMs) are powerful yet mostly for text generation tasks. We provide a unified definition of tools as external programs used by LMs. We empirically study the efficiency of various tooling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T17:20:07Z)
• StrategyLLM: Large Language Models as Strategy Generators, Executors, Optimizers, and Evaluators for Problem Solving [76.5322280307861]
  StrategyLLM allows LLMs to perform inductive reasoning, deriving general strategies from specific task instances, and deductive reasoning, applying these general strategies to particular task examples, for constructing generalizable and consistent few-shot prompts. Experimental results demonstrate that StrategyLLM outperforms the competitive baseline CoT-SC that requires human-annotated solutions on 13 datasets across 4 challenging tasks without human involvement, including math reasoning (34.2% $rightarrow$ 38.8%), commonsense reasoning (70.3% $rightarrow$ 72.5%), algorithmic reasoning (73.7% $rightarrow$ 85.0
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T09:18:09Z)
• Risk-reducing design and operations toolkit: 90 strategies for managing risk and uncertainty in decision problems [65.268245109828]
  This paper develops a catalog of such strategies and develops a framework for them. It argues that they provide an efficient response to decision problems that are seemingly intractable due to high uncertainty. It then proposes a framework to incorporate them into decision theory using multi-objective optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T16:14:32Z)
• Scalable and Equitable Math Problem Solving Strategy Prediction in Big Educational Data [2.86829428083307]
  We develop an embedding called MVec where we learn a representation based on the mastery of students. We then cluster these embeddings with a non-parametric clustering method. We show that our approach can scale up to achieve high accuracy by training on a small sample of a large dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T19:51:10Z)
• ALE: A Simulation-Based Active Learning Evaluation Framework for the Parameter-Driven Comparison of Query Strategies for NLP [3.024761040393842]
  Active Learning (AL) proposes promising data points to annotators they annotate next instead of a subsequent or random sample. This method is supposed to save annotation effort while maintaining model performance. We introduce a reproducible active learning evaluation framework for the comparative evaluation of AL strategies in NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T10:42:11Z)
• Integrating Crowdsourcing and Active Learning for Classification of Work-Life Events from Tweets [9.137917522951277]
  Social media data are unstructured and must undergo complex manipulation for research use. We devised a crowdsourcing pipeline combined with active learning strategies. Results show that crowdsourcing is useful to create high-quality annotations and active learning helps in reducing the number of required tweets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T20:19:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.