Equivariant Bootstrapping for Uncertainty Quantification in Imaging Inverse Problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11838v2
• Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:48:25 GMT
• Title: Equivariant Bootstrapping for Uncertainty Quantification in Imaging Inverse Problems
• Authors: Julian Tachella and Marcelo Pereyra
• Abstract summary: We present a new uncertainty quantification methodology based on an equivariant formulation of the parametric bootstrap algorithm. The proposed methodology is general and can be easily applied with any image reconstruction technique. We demonstrate the proposed approach with a series of numerical experiments and through comparisons with alternative uncertainty quantification strategies.
• Score: 0.24475591916185502
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Scientific imaging problems are often severely ill-posed, and hence have significant intrinsic uncertainty. Accurately quantifying the uncertainty in the solutions to such problems is therefore critical for the rigorous interpretation of experimental results as well as for reliably using the reconstructed images as scientific evidence. Unfortunately, existing imaging methods are unable to quantify the uncertainty in the reconstructed images in a manner that is robust to experiment replications. This paper presents a new uncertainty quantification methodology based on an equivariant formulation of the parametric bootstrap algorithm that leverages symmetries and invariance properties commonly encountered in imaging problems. Additionally, the proposed methodology is general and can be easily applied with any image reconstruction technique, including unsupervised training strategies that can be trained from observed data alone, thus enabling uncertainty quantification in situations where there is no ground truth data available. We demonstrate the proposed approach with a series of numerical experiments and through comparisons with alternative uncertainty quantification strategies from the state-of-the-art, such as Bayesian strategies involving score-based diffusion models and Langevin samplers. In all our experiments, the proposed method delivers remarkably accurate high-dimensional confidence regions and outperforms the competing approaches in terms of estimation accuracy, uncertainty quantification accuracy, and computing time.

Related papers

• One step closer to unbiased aleatoric uncertainty estimation [71.55174353766289]
  We propose a new estimation method by actively de-noising the observed data. By conducting a broad range of experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed approach provides a much closer approximation to the actual data uncertainty than the standard method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T14:59:11Z)
• Principal Uncertainty Quantification with Spatial Correlation for Image Restoration Problems [35.46703074728443]
  PUQ -- Principal Uncertainty Quantification -- is a novel definition and corresponding analysis of uncertainty regions. We derive uncertainty intervals around principal components of the empirical posterior distribution, forming an ambiguity region. Our approach is verified through experiments on image colorization, super-resolution, and inpainting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T11:08:13Z)
• Amortized Normalizing Flows for Transcranial Ultrasound with Uncertainty Quantification [1.1744028458220426]
  We present a novel approach to transcranial ultrasound computed tomography that utilizes normalizing flows to improve the speed of imaging. We make use of a physics-informed summary statistic to incorporate the known ultrasound physics with the goal of compressing large incoming observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T20:13:41Z)
• Image-to-Image Regression with Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification and Applications in Imaging [88.20869695803631]
  We show how to derive uncertainty intervals around each pixel that are guaranteed to contain the true value. We evaluate our procedure on three image-to-image regression tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T18:59:56Z)
• NUQ: Nonparametric Uncertainty Quantification for Deterministic Neural Networks [151.03112356092575]
  We show the principled way to measure the uncertainty of predictions for a classifier based on Nadaraya-Watson's nonparametric estimate of the conditional label distribution. We demonstrate the strong performance of the method in uncertainty estimation tasks on a variety of real-world image datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T12:30:45Z)
• Deblurring via Stochastic Refinement [85.42730934561101]
  We present an alternative framework for blind deblurring based on conditional diffusion models. Our method is competitive in terms of distortion metrics such as PSNR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-05T04:36:09Z)
• Robustness via Uncertainty-aware Cycle Consistency [44.34422859532988]
  Unpaired image-to-image translation refers to learning inter-image-domain mapping without corresponding image pairs. Existing methods learn deterministic mappings without explicitly modelling the robustness to outliers or predictive uncertainty. We propose a novel probabilistic method based on Uncertainty-aware Generalized Adaptive Cycle Consistency (UGAC)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-24T15:33:21Z)
• Deep Bayesian inference for seismic imaging with tasks [0.6445605125467573]
  We propose to use techniques from Bayesian inference and deep neural networks to translate uncertainty in seismic imaging to uncertainty in tasks performed on the image. A systematic approach is proposed to translate uncertainty due to noise in the data to confidence intervals of automatically tracked horizons in the image.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T15:25:44Z)
• Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation of Learned Variational MRI Reconstruction [63.202627467245584]
  We introduce a Bayesian variational framework to quantify the model-immanent (epistemic) uncertainty. We demonstrate that our approach yields competitive results for undersampled MRI reconstruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T18:08:14Z)
• Quantifying Sources of Uncertainty in Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction [5.129343375966527]
  We propose a scalable and efficient framework to simultaneously quantify aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties in learned iterative image reconstruction. We show that our method exhibits competitive performance against conventional benchmarks for computed tomography with both sparse view and limited angle data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-17T04:12:52Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Few-Shot Image Classification [118.72423376789062]
  Few-shot image classification learns to recognize new categories from limited labelled data. We propose Uncertainty-Aware Few-Shot framework for image classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T12:26:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.