Synthetic Data as Validation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.16052v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:59:55 GMT
• Title: Synthetic Data as Validation
• Authors: Qixin Hu, Alan Yuille, Zongwei Zhou
• Abstract summary: We illustrate the effectiveness of synthetic data for early cancer detection in computed tomography (CT) volumes. We establish a new continual learning framework that continuously trains AI models on a stream of out-domain data with synthetic tumors. The AI model trained and validated in dynamically expanding synthetic data can consistently outperform models trained and validated exclusively on real-world data.
• Score: 9.506660694536649
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This study leverages synthetic data as a validation set to reduce overfitting and ease the selection of the best model in AI development. While synthetic data have been used for augmenting the training set, we find that synthetic data can also significantly diversify the validation set, offering marked advantages in domains like healthcare, where data are typically limited, sensitive, and from out-domain sources (i.e., hospitals). In this study, we illustrate the effectiveness of synthetic data for early cancer detection in computed tomography (CT) volumes, where synthetic tumors are generated and superimposed onto healthy organs, thereby creating an extensive dataset for rigorous validation. Using synthetic data as validation can improve AI robustness in both in-domain and out-domain test sets. Furthermore, we establish a new continual learning framework that continuously trains AI models on a stream of out-domain data with synthetic tumors. The AI model trained and validated in dynamically expanding synthetic data can consistently outperform models trained and validated exclusively on real-world data. Specifically, the DSC score for liver tumor segmentation improves from 26.7% (95% CI: 22.6%-30.9%) to 34.5% (30.8%-38.2%) when evaluated on an in-domain dataset and from 31.1% (26.0%-36.2%) to 35.4% (32.1%-38.7%) on an out-domain dataset. Importantly, the performance gain is particularly significant in identifying very tiny liver tumors (radius < 5mm) in CT volumes, with Sensitivity improving from 33.1% to 55.4% on an in-domain dataset and 33.9% to 52.3% on an out-domain dataset, justifying the efficacy in early detection of cancer. The application of synthetic data, from both training and validation perspectives, underlines a promising avenue to enhance AI robustness when dealing with data from varying domains.

Related papers

• Handling Geometric Domain Shifts in Semantic Segmentation of Surgical RGB and Hyperspectral Images [67.66644395272075]
  We present first analysis of state-of-the-art semantic segmentation models when faced with geometric out-of-distribution data. We propose an augmentation technique called "Organ Transplantation" to enhance generalizability. Our augmentation technique improves SOA model performance by up to 67 % for RGB data and 90 % for HSI data, achieving performance at the level of in-distribution performance on real OOD test data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T19:13:15Z)
• Exploring the Impact of Synthetic Data for Aerial-view Human Detection [17.41001388151408]
  Aerial-view human detection has a large demand for large-scale data to capture more diverse human appearances. Synthetic data can be a good resource to expand data, but the domain gap with real-world data is the biggest obstacle to its use in training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T04:19:48Z)
• Utilizing Large Language Models to Generate Synthetic Data to Increase the Performance of BERT-Based Neural Networks [0.7071166713283337]
  We created datasets large enough to train machine learning models. Our goal is to label behaviors corresponding to autism criteria. Augmenting data increased recall by 13% but decreased precision by 16%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T03:18:12Z)
• On the Equivalency, Substitutability, and Flexibility of Synthetic Data [9.459709213597707]
  We investigate the equivalency of synthetic data to real-world data, the substitutability of synthetic data for real data, and the flexibility of synthetic data generators. Our results suggest that synthetic data not only enhances model performance but also demonstrates substitutability for real data, with 60% to 80% replacement without performance loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-24T17:21:32Z)
• Synthetically Enhanced: Unveiling Synthetic Data's Potential in Medical Imaging Research [4.475998415951477]
  Generative AI offers a promising approach to generating synthetic images, enhancing dataset diversity. This study investigates the impact of synthetic data supplementation on the performance and generalizability of medical imaging research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T21:58:01Z)
• TarGEN: Targeted Data Generation with Large Language Models [51.87504111286201]
  TarGEN is a multi-step prompting strategy for generating high-quality synthetic datasets. We augment TarGEN with a method known as self-correction empowering LLMs to rectify inaccurately labeled instances. A comprehensive analysis of the synthetic dataset compared to the original dataset reveals similar or higher levels of dataset complexity and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T03:32:17Z)
• Let's Synthesize Step by Step: Iterative Dataset Synthesis with Large Language Models by Extrapolating Errors from Small Models [69.76066070227452]
  *Data Synthesis* is a promising way to train a small model with very little labeled data. We propose *Synthesis Step by Step* (**S3**), a data synthesis framework that shrinks this distribution gap. Our approach improves the performance of a small model by reducing the gap between the synthetic dataset and the real data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T17:14:25Z)
• The effect of data augmentation and 3D-CNN depth on Alzheimer's Disease detection [51.697248252191265]
  This work summarizes and strictly observes best practices regarding data handling, experimental design, and model evaluation. We focus on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) detection, which serves as a paradigmatic example of challenging problem in healthcare. Within this framework, we train predictive 15 models, considering three different data augmentation strategies and five distinct 3D CNN architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T10:40:41Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Enhancing the Utility of Synthetic Data via Post-Processing Techniques [7.967995669387532]
  generative models have emerged as a promising solution for generating synthetic datasets that can replace or augment real-world data. We propose three novel post-processing techniques to improve the quality and diversity of the synthetic dataset. Experiments show that Gap Filler (GaFi) effectively reduces the gap with real-accuracy scores to an error of 2.03%, 1.78%, and 3.99% on the Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100 datasets, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T10:50:38Z)
• Generative models improve fairness of medical classifiers under distribution shifts [49.10233060774818]
  We show that learning realistic augmentations automatically from data is possible in a label-efficient manner using generative models. We demonstrate that these learned augmentations can surpass ones by making models more robust and statistically fair in- and out-of-distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T18:15:38Z)
• Fader Networks for domain adaptation on fMRI: ABIDE-II study [68.5481471934606]
  We use 3D convolutional autoencoders to build the domain irrelevant latent space image representation and demonstrate this method to outperform existing approaches on ABIDE data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T16:50:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.