InstOptima: Evolutionary Multi-objective Instruction Optimization via Large Language Model-based Instruction Operators

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17630v1
• Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:48:45 GMT
• Title: InstOptima: Evolutionary Multi-objective Instruction Optimization via Large Language Model-based Instruction Operators
• Authors: Heng Yang, Ke Li
• Abstract summary: InstOptima treats instruction generation as an evolutionary multi-objective optimization problem. We introduce an objective-guided mechanism for operators, allowing the LLM to comprehend the objectives and enhance the quality of the generated instructions. Experimental results demonstrate improved fine-tuning performance and the generation of a diverse set of high-quality instructions.
• Score: 9.004528034920266
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Instruction-based language modeling has received significant attention in pretrained language models. However, the efficiency of instruction engineering remains low and hinders the development of instruction studies. Recent studies have focused on automating instruction generation, but they primarily aim to improve performance without considering other crucial objectives that impact instruction quality, such as instruction length and perplexity. Therefore, we propose a novel approach (i.e., InstOptima) that treats instruction generation as an evolutionary multi-objective optimization problem. In contrast to text edition-based methods, our approach utilizes a large language model (LLM) to simulate instruction operators, including mutation and crossover. Furthermore, we introduce an objective-guided mechanism for these operators, allowing the LLM to comprehend the objectives and enhance the quality of the generated instructions. Experimental results demonstrate improved fine-tuning performance and the generation of a diverse set of high-quality instructions.

Related papers

• RAISE: Reinforenced Adaptive Instruction Selection For Large Language Models [48.63476198469349]
  We propose a task-objective-driven instruction selection framework RAISE. RAISE incorporates the entire instruction fine-tuning process into optimization. It selects instruction at each step based on the expected impact of instruction on model performance improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T21:17:52Z)
• Eliciting Causal Abilities in Large Language Models for Reasoning Tasks [14.512834333917414]
  We introduce the Self-Causal Instruction Enhancement (SCIE) method, which enables LLMs to generate high-quality, low-quantity observational data. In SCIE, the instructions are treated as the treatment, and textual features are used to process natural language. Our method effectively generates instructions that enhance reasoning performance with reduced training cost of prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T17:03:02Z)
• MLAN: Language-Based Instruction Tuning Improves Zero-Shot Generalization of Multimodal Large Language Models [79.0546136194314]
  We present a novel instruction tuning recipe to improve the zero-shot task generalization of multimodal large language models. We evaluate the performance of the proposed approach on 9 unseen datasets across both language and vision modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T20:09:59Z)
• Align$^2$LLaVA: Cascaded Human and Large Language Model Preference Alignment for Multi-modal Instruction Curation [56.75665429851673]
  This paper introduces a novel instruction curation algorithm, derived from two unique perspectives, human and LLM preference alignment. Experiments demonstrate that we can maintain or even improve model performance by compressing synthetic multimodal instructions by up to 90%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T08:20:59Z)
• SwitchCIT: Switching for Continual Instruction Tuning of Large Language Models [14.085371250265224]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive capabilities in various domains, particularly in general language understanding. However these models, trained on massive text data, may not be finely optimized for specific tasks triggered by instructions. This work addresses the catastrophic forgetting in continual instruction learning for LLMs through a switching mechanism for routing computations to parameter-efficient tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T14:37:33Z)
• Automatic Instruction Evolving for Large Language Models [93.52437926313621]
  Auto Evol-Instruct is an end-to-end framework that evolves instruction datasets using large language models without any human effort. Our experiments demonstrate that the best method optimized by Auto Evol-Instruct outperforms human-designed methods on various benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-02T15:09:00Z)
• From Symbolic Tasks to Code Generation: Diversification Yields Better Task Performers [1.6958018695660049]
  We show that a more diverse instruction set, extending beyond code-related tasks, improves the performance of code generation. Our observations suggest that a more diverse semantic space for instruction-tuning sets greatly improves the model's ability to follow instructions and perform tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T07:54:07Z)
• Enhancing Robotic Manipulation with AI Feedback from Multimodal Large Language Models [41.38520841504846]
  Large language models (LLMs) can provide automated preference feedback solely from image inputs to guide decision-making. In this study, we train a multimodal LLM, termed CriticGPT, capable of understanding trajectory videos in robot manipulation tasks. Experimental evaluation of the algorithm's preference accuracy demonstrates its effective generalization ability to new tasks. Performance on Meta-World tasks reveals that CriticGPT's reward model efficiently guides policy learning, surpassing rewards based on state-of-the-art pre-trained representation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T03:14:03Z)
• Transformer-based Causal Language Models Perform Clustering [20.430255724239448]
  We introduce a simplified instruction-following task and use synthetic datasets to analyze a Transformer-based causal language model. Our findings suggest that the model learns task-specific information by clustering data within its hidden space, with this clustering process evolving dynamically during learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T14:02:31Z)
• Are Large Language Models Good Prompt Optimizers? [65.48910201816223]
  We conduct a study to uncover the actual mechanism of LLM-based Prompt Optimization. Our findings reveal that the LLMs struggle to identify the true causes of errors during reflection, tending to be biased by their own prior knowledge. We introduce a new "Automatic Behavior Optimization" paradigm, which directly optimize the target model's behavior in a more controllable manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T09:48:54Z)
• Accelerating LLaMA Inference by Enabling Intermediate Layer Decoding via Instruction Tuning with LITE [62.13435256279566]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across a wide variety of natural language tasks. However, their large size makes their inference slow and computationally expensive. We show that it enables these layers to acquire 'good' generation ability without affecting the generation ability of the final layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T04:07:58Z)
• From Language Modeling to Instruction Following: Understanding the Behavior Shift in LLMs after Instruction Tuning [63.63840740526497]
  We investigate how instruction tuning adjusts pre-trained models with a focus on intrinsic changes. The impact of instruction tuning is then studied by comparing the explanations derived from the pre-trained and instruction-tuned models. Our findings reveal three significant impacts of instruction tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T21:16:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.