Measuring Behavior Change with Observational Studies: a Review
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.19951v2
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 18:20:28 GMT
- Title: Measuring Behavior Change with Observational Studies: a Review
- Authors: Arianna Pera, Gianmarco de Francisci Morales, Luca Maria Aiello
- Abstract summary: We analyzed 148 articles (2000-2023) and built a map that categorizes behaviors and change detection methodologies.
Our findings uncover a focus on sentiment shifts, an emphasis on API-restricted platforms, and limited theory integration.
- Score: 3.683202928838613
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Exploring behavioral change in the digital age is imperative for societal
progress in the context of 21st-century challenges. We analyzed 148 articles
(2000-2023) and built a map that categorizes behaviors and change detection
methodologies, platforms of reference, and theoretical frameworks that
characterize online behavior change. Our findings uncover a focus on sentiment
shifts, an emphasis on API-restricted platforms, and limited theory
integration. We call for methodologies able to capture a wider range of
behavioral types, diverse data sources, and stronger theory-practice alignment
in the study of online behavioral change.
Related papers
- Behavior Matters: An Alternative Perspective on Promoting Responsible Data Science [9.696812613037448]
Data science pipelines can easily propagate social inequity and harm.
Traditional solutions are technical in nature; e.g., mitigating biased algorithms.
We introduce a novel lens for promoting responsible data science using theories of behavior change.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T16:59:18Z) - Revisiting Dynamic Evaluation: Online Adaptation for Large Language
Models [88.47454470043552]
We consider the problem of online fine tuning the parameters of a language model at test time, also known as dynamic evaluation.
Online adaptation turns parameters into temporally changing states and provides a form of context-length extension with memory in weights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-03T14:03:48Z) - Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable.
Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs.
We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z) - Inverse Decision Modeling: Learning Interpretable Representations of
Behavior [72.80902932543474]
We develop an expressive, unifying perspective on inverse decision modeling.
We use this to formalize the inverse problem (as a descriptive model)
We illustrate how this structure enables learning (interpretable) representations of (bounded) rationality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-28T05:05:01Z) - Incorporating Heterogeneous User Behaviors and Social Influences for
Predictive Analysis [32.31161268928372]
We aim to incorporate heterogeneous user behaviors and social influences for behavior predictions.
This paper proposes a variant of Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) which can consider context while a behavior sequence.
A residual learning-based decoder is designed to automatically construct multiple high-order cross features based on social behavior representation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-24T17:05:37Z) - Personalized Interventions for Online Moderation [0.9346127431927982]
Current online moderation follows a one-size-fits-all approach.
We propose a paradigm-shift in online moderation by moving towards a personalized and user-centered approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-19T10:44:57Z) - From Concept Drift to Model Degradation: An Overview on
Performance-Aware Drift Detectors [1.757501664210825]
Changes in the system on which a predictive machine learning model has been trained may lead to performance degradation during the system's life cycle.
Different terms have been used in the literature to refer to the same type of concept drift and the same term for various types.
This lack of unified terminology is set out to create confusion on distinguishing between different concept drift variants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-21T15:48:13Z) - Active Inference in Robotics and Artificial Agents: Survey and
Challenges [51.29077770446286]
We review the state-of-the-art theory and implementations of active inference for state-estimation, control, planning and learning.
We showcase relevant experiments that illustrate its potential in terms of adaptation, generalization and robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-03T12:10:26Z) - Models we Can Trust: Toward a Systematic Discipline of (Agent-Based)
Model Interpretation and Validation [0.0]
We advocate the development of a discipline of interacting with and extracting information from models.
We outline some directions for the development of a such a discipline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-23T10:52:22Z) - Disentangling Adaptive Gradient Methods from Learning Rates [65.0397050979662]
We take a deeper look at how adaptive gradient methods interact with the learning rate schedule.
We introduce a "grafting" experiment which decouples an update's magnitude from its direction.
We present some empirical and theoretical retrospectives on the generalization of adaptive gradient methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-26T21:42:49Z) - FLAT: Few-Shot Learning via Autoencoding Transformation Regularizers [67.46036826589467]
We present a novel regularization mechanism by learning the change of feature representations induced by a distribution of transformations without using the labels of data examples.
It could minimize the risk of overfitting into base categories by inspecting the transformation-augmented variations at the encoded feature level.
Experiment results show the superior performances to the current state-of-the-art methods in literature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-29T15:26:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.