Haar-random and pretty good measurements for Bayesian state estimation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20565v2
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 04:17:00 GMT
- Title: Haar-random and pretty good measurements for Bayesian state estimation
- Authors: Maria Quadeer,
- Abstract summary: We derive a bound on fidelity averaged over IID sequences of random measurements for a uniform ensemble of pure states.
For ensembles of mixed qubit states, we find that measurements defined through unitary 2-designs closely approximate those defined via Haar random unitaries.
For a single-shot-update, we show using the Petz recovery map for pretty good measurement that it can give pretty good Bayesian mean estimates.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We study Haar-random bases and pretty good measurement for Bayesian state estimation. Given $N$ Haar-random bases we derive a bound on fidelity averaged over IID sequences of such random measurements for a uniform ensemble of pure states. For ensembles of mixed qubit states, we find that measurements defined through unitary 2-designs closely approximate those defined via Haar random unitaries while the Pauli group only gives a weak lower bound. For a single-shot-update, we show using the Petz recovery map for pretty good measurement that it can give pretty good Bayesian mean estimates.
Related papers
- Efficient Fidelity Estimation with Few Local Pauli Measurements [3.428706362109922]
We develop a protocol for quantifying how close an experimental state aligns with a target.<n>We analyze the bias in this estimator, linking its performance to the mixing time $tau$ of a Markov chain induced by the target state.<n>This work enables scalable benchmarking, error characterization, and tomography assistance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-09T12:35:58Z) - In-Context Parametric Inference: Point or Distribution Estimators? [66.22308335324239]
We show that amortized point estimators generally outperform posterior inference, though the latter remain competitive in some low-dimensional problems.
Our experiments indicate that amortized point estimators generally outperform posterior inference, though the latter remain competitive in some low-dimensional problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T10:00:24Z) - Efficient Sampling for Pauli Measurement-Based Shadow Tomography in Direct Fidelity Estimation [4.513787113118679]
A constant number of random Clifford measurements allows the classical shadow protocol to perform direct fidelity estimation (DFE) with high precision.
We show that similar strategies can be derived from classical shadows.
Specifically, we describe efficient methods using only local Pauli measurements to perform DFE with GHZ, W, and Dicke states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-07T04:09:13Z) - Verifying randomness in sets of quantum states via observables [4.289151408389622]
We show that Haar-randomness is connected to the Dirichlet distribution, and provide a closed-form expression, and simple bounds of the statistical moments.
We generalize this metric to permutation- and unitary-equivalent observables, ensuring that if the extended average randomness is compatible with a Haar-random distribution, then the set of states is approximately Haar-random.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T21:11:58Z) - The role of shared randomness in quantum state certification with
unentangled measurements [36.19846254657676]
We study quantum state certification using unentangled quantum measurements.
$Theta(d2/varepsilon2)$ copies are necessary and sufficient for state certification.
We develop a unified lower bound framework for both fixed and randomized measurements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-17T23:44:52Z) - Conformal Nucleus Sampling [67.5232384936661]
We assess whether a top-$p$ set is indeed aligned with its probabilistic meaning in various linguistic contexts.
We find that OPT models are overconfident, and that calibration shows a moderate inverse scaling with model size.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-04T08:11:57Z) - Double Robust Bayesian Inference on Average Treatment Effects [2.458652618559425]
We propose a double robust Bayesian inference procedure on the average treatment effect (ATE) under unconfoundedness.
For our new Bayesian approach, we first adjust the prior distributions of the conditional mean functions, and then correct the posterior distribution of the resulting ATE.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-29T15:32:25Z) - Shortcomings of Top-Down Randomization-Based Sanity Checks for
Evaluations of Deep Neural Network Explanations [67.40641255908443]
We identify limitations of model-randomization-based sanity checks for the purpose of evaluating explanations.
Top-down model randomization preserves scales of forward pass activations with high probability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-22T18:52:38Z) - Testing randomness of series generated in Bell's experiment [62.997667081978825]
We use a toy fiber optic based setup to generate binary series, and evaluate their level of randomness according to Ville principle.
Series are tested with a battery of standard statistical indicators, Hurst, Kolmogorov complexity, minimum entropy, Takensarity dimension of embedding, and Augmented Dickey Fuller and Kwiatkowski Phillips Schmidt Shin to check station exponent.
The level of randomness of series obtained by applying Toeplitz extractor to rejected series is found to be indistinguishable from the level of non-rejected raw ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-31T17:39:29Z) - Scalable estimation of pure multi-qubit states [0.0]
We introduce an inductive $n$-qubit pure-state estimation method.
The proposed method exhibits a very favorable scaling in the number of qubits when compared to other estimation methods.
We experimentally demonstrate the proposed method in one of IBM's quantum processors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T19:02:56Z) - Instance-Optimal Compressed Sensing via Posterior Sampling [101.43899352984774]
We show for Gaussian measurements and emphany prior distribution on the signal, that the posterior sampling estimator achieves near-optimal recovery guarantees.
We implement the posterior sampling estimator for deep generative priors using Langevin dynamics, and empirically find that it produces accurate estimates with more diversity than MAP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-21T22:51:56Z) - Bayesian parameter estimation using Gaussian states and measurements [0.0]
We consider three paradigmatic estimation schemes in continuous-variable quantum metrology.
We investigate the precision achievable with single-mode Gaussian states under homodyne and heterodyne detection.
This allows us to identify Bayesian estimation strategies that combine good performance with the potential for straightforward experimental realization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-08T12:54:12Z) - Nonparametric Estimation of the Fisher Information and Its Applications [82.00720226775964]
This paper considers the problem of estimation of the Fisher information for location from a random sample of size $n$.
An estimator proposed by Bhattacharya is revisited and improved convergence rates are derived.
A new estimator, termed a clipped estimator, is proposed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-07T17:21:56Z) - Distributionally Robust Bayesian Quadrature Optimization [60.383252534861136]
We study BQO under distributional uncertainty in which the underlying probability distribution is unknown except for a limited set of its i.i.d. samples.
A standard BQO approach maximizes the Monte Carlo estimate of the true expected objective given the fixed sample set.
We propose a novel posterior sampling based algorithm, namely distributionally robust BQO (DRBQO) for this purpose.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-19T12:00:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.