What Makes for Good Visual Instructions? Synthesizing Complex Visual Reasoning Instructions for Visual Instruction Tuning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01487v2
• Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 09:06:42 GMT
• Title: What Makes for Good Visual Instructions? Synthesizing Complex Visual Reasoning Instructions for Visual Instruction Tuning
• Authors: Yifan Du, Hangyu Guo, Kun Zhou, Wayne Xin Zhao, Jinpeng Wang, Chuyuan Wang, Mingchen Cai, Ruihua Song, Ji-Rong Wen,
• Abstract summary: Visual instruction tuning is crucial for enhancing the zero-shot generalization capability of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) We develop a systematic approach to automatically create high-quality complex visual reasoning instructions. Experimental results consistently demonstrate the enhanced performance of all compared MLLMs.
• Score: 111.01953096869947
• License:
• Abstract: Visual instruction tuning is crucial for enhancing the zero-shot generalization capability of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs). In this paper, we aim to investigate a fundamental question: ''what makes for good visual instructions''. Through a comprehensive empirical study, we find that instructions focusing on complex visual reasoning tasks are particularly effective in improving the performance of MLLMs, with results correlating to instruction complexity. Based on this insight, we develop a systematic approach to automatically create high-quality complex visual reasoning instructions. Our approach employs a synthesize-complicate-reformulate paradigm, leveraging multiple stages to gradually increase the complexity of the instructions while guaranteeing quality. Based on this approach, we create the ComVint dataset with 32K examples, and fine-tune four MLLMs on it. Experimental results consistently demonstrate the enhanced performance of all compared MLLMs, such as a 27.86% and 27.60% improvement for LLaVA on MME-Perception and MME-Cognition, respectively. Our code and data are publicly available at the link: https://github.com/RUCAIBox/ComVint.

Related papers

• Inst-IT: Boosting Multimodal Instance Understanding via Explicit Visual Prompt Instruction Tuning [125.79428219851289]
  Inst-IT is a solution to enhance LMMs in Instance understanding via explicit visual prompt Instruction Tuning. Inst-IT consists of a benchmark to diagnose multimodal instance-level understanding, a large-scale instruction-tuning dataset, and a continuous instruction-tuning training paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-04T18:58:10Z)
• EMMA: Efficient Visual Alignment in Multi-Modal LLMs [56.03417732498859]
  EMMA is a lightweight cross-modality module designed to efficiently fuse visual and textual encodings. EMMA boosts performance across multiple tasks by up to 9.3% while significantly improving robustness against hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T23:00:31Z)
• Enhancing LLM's Cognition via Structurization [41.13997892843677]
  Large language models (LLMs) process input contexts through a causal and sequential perspective. This paper presents a novel concept of context structurization. Specifically, we transform the plain, unordered contextual sentences into well-ordered and hierarchically structurized elements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T12:33:58Z)
• MIA-Bench: Towards Better Instruction Following Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs [47.94710556156627]
  MIA-Bench is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on their ability to strictly adhere to complex instructions. Our benchmark comprises a diverse set of 400 image-prompt pairs, each crafted to challenge the models' compliance with layered instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T17:53:35Z)
• Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMs [61.143381152739046]
  We introduce Cambrian-1, a family of multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) designed with a vision-centric approach. Our study uses LLMs and visual instruction tuning as an interface to evaluate various visual representations. We provide model weights, code, supporting tools, datasets, and detailed instruction-tuning and evaluation recipes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T17:59:42Z)
• Enhancing and Assessing Instruction-Following with Fine-Grained Instruction Variants [28.691691883519542]
  We introduce a technique that decomposes complex instructions into simpler sub-components, modifies these, and reconstructs them into new variants. Based on DeMoRecon, we developed the FGIV dataset which contains fine-grained instruction variants of 1,773 seed instructions. Our findings show that LLMs fine-tuned with FGIV will gain significant performance boost on both ours and commonly used instructions-following benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T08:08:11Z)
• Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via Robust Instruction Tuning [92.85265959892115]
  This paper introduces the first large and diverse visual instruction tuning dataset, named Large-scale Robust Visual (LRV)-Instruction. Our dataset comprises 400k visual instructions generated by GPT4, covering 16 vision-and-language tasks with open-ended instructions and answers. To efficiently measure the hallucination generated by LMMs, we propose GPT4-Assisted Visual Instruction Evaluation (GAVIE), a stable approach to evaluate visual instruction tuning like human experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T10:26:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.