The R.O.A.D. to precision medicine

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01681v1
• Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 03:08:15 GMT
• Title: The R.O.A.D. to precision medicine
• Authors: Dimitris Bertsimas, Angelos G. Koulouras, Georgios Antonios Margonis
• Abstract summary: We propose a prognostic stratum matching framework that addresses the deficiencies of Randomized trial data subgroup analysis. We apply our framework to observational data of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and validated the OPTs in an external cohort.
• Score: 5.877778007271621
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We propose a prognostic stratum matching framework that addresses the deficiencies of Randomized trial data subgroup analysis and transforms ObservAtional Data to be used as if they were randomized, thus paving the road for precision medicine. Our approach counters the effects of unobserved confounding in observational data by correcting the estimated probabilities of the outcome under a treatment through a novel two-step process. These probabilities are then used to train Optimal Policy Trees (OPTs), which are decision trees that optimally assign treatments to subgroups of patients based on their characteristics. This facilitates the creation of clinically intuitive treatment recommendations. We applied our framework to observational data of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and validated the OPTs in an external cohort using the sensitivity and specificity metrics. We show that these recommendations outperformed those of experts in GIST. We further applied the same framework to randomized clinical trial (RCT) data of patients with extremity sarcomas. Remarkably, despite the initial trial results suggesting that all patients should receive treatment, our framework, after addressing imbalances in patient distribution due to the trial's small sample size, identified through the OPTs a subset of patients with unique characteristics who may not require treatment. Again, we successfully validated our recommendations in an external cohort.

Related papers

• Identifying treatment response subgroups in observational time-to-event data [2.176207087460772]
  Our work introduces a novel, outcome-guided method for identifying treatment response subgroups in observational studies. Our approach positions itself in between individualised and average treatment effect estimation. In experiments, our approach significantly outperforms the current state-of-the-art method for outcome-guided subgroup analysis in both randomised and observational treatment regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T22:38:14Z)
• Estimating treatment effects from single-arm trials via latent-variable modeling [14.083487062917085]
  Single-arm trials, where all patients belong to the treatment group, can be a viable alternative but require access to an external control group. We propose an identifiable deep latent-variable model for this scenario. Our results show improved performance both for direct treatment effect estimation as well as for effect estimation via patient matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T10:12:54Z)
• Safe and Interpretable Estimation of Optimal Treatment Regimes [54.257304443780434]
  We operationalize a safe and interpretable framework to identify optimal treatment regimes. Our findings support personalized treatment strategies based on a patient's medical history and pharmacological features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T19:59:10Z)
• TREEMENT: Interpretable Patient-Trial Matching via Personalized Dynamic Tree-Based Memory Network [54.332862955411656]
  Clinical trials are critical for drug development but often suffer from expensive and inefficient patient recruitment. In recent years, machine learning models have been proposed for speeding up patient recruitment via automatically matching patients with clinical trials. We introduce a dynamic tree-based memory network model named TREEMENT to provide accurate and interpretable patient trial matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T12:35:09Z)
• Improved Policy Evaluation for Randomized Trials of Algorithmic Resource Allocation [54.72195809248172]
  We present a new estimator leveraging our proposed novel concept, that involves retrospective reshuffling of participants across experimental arms at the end of an RCT. We prove theoretically that such an estimator is more accurate than common estimators based on sample means.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T05:17:22Z)
• Adaptive Semi-Supervised Inference for Optimal Treatment Decisions with Electronic Medical Record Data [18.77246683875067]
  The optimal treatment regime that yields the greatest overall expected clinical outcome of interest has attracted a lot of attention. We consider estimation of the optimal treatment regime with electronic medical record data under a semi-supervised setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-04T13:54:35Z)
• Learning Individualized Treatment Rules with Estimated Translated Inverse Propensity Score [29.606141542532356]
  In this paper, we focus on learning individualized treatment rules (ITRs) to derive a treatment policy. In our framework, we cast ITRs learning as a contextual bandit problem and minimize the expected risk of the treatment policy. As a long-term goal, our derived policy might eventually lead to better clinical guidelines for the administration of IV and VP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T13:13:56Z)
• Hemogram Data as a Tool for Decision-making in COVID-19 Management: Applications to Resource Scarcity Scenarios [62.997667081978825]
  COVID-19 pandemics has challenged emergency response systems worldwide, with widespread reports of essential services breakdown and collapse of health care structure. This work describes a machine learning model derived from hemogram exam data performed in symptomatic patients. Proposed models can predict COVID-19 qRT-PCR results in symptomatic individuals with high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-10T01:45:03Z)
• DTR Bandit: Learning to Make Response-Adaptive Decisions With Low Regret [59.81290762273153]
  Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) are personalized, adaptive, multi-stage treatment plans that adapt treatment decisions to an individual's initial features and to intermediate outcomes and features at each subsequent stage. We propose a novel algorithm that, by carefully balancing exploration and exploitation, is guaranteed to achieve rate-optimal regret when the transition and reward models are linear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-06T13:03:42Z)
• Near-optimal Individualized Treatment Recommendations [9.585155938486048]
  individualized treatment recommendation (ITR) is an important analytic framework for precision medicine. We propose two methods to estimate the optimal A-ITR within the outcome weighted learning (OWL) framework. We show the consistency of these methods and obtain an upper bound for the risk between the theoretically optimal recommendation and the estimated one.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T15:59:33Z)
• Contextual Constrained Learning for Dose-Finding Clinical Trials [102.8283665750281]
  C3T-Budget is a contextual constrained clinical trial algorithm for dose-finding under both budget and safety constraints. It recruits patients with consideration of the remaining budget, the remaining time, and the characteristics of each group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-08T11:46:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.