Feature Space Renormalization for Semi-supervised Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04055v1
• Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 15:07:02 GMT
• Title: Feature Space Renormalization for Semi-supervised Learning
• Abstract summary: Semi-supervised learning (SSL) has been proven to be a powerful method for leveraging unlabelled data. This paper proposes a feature space renormalization (FSR) mechanism for SSL. We show that our method can achieve better performance on a variety of standard SSL benchmark datasets.
• Score: 11.83643978312292
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Semi-supervised learning (SSL) has been proven to be a powerful method for leveraging unlabelled data to alleviate models' dependence on large labelled datasets. The common framework among recent approaches is to train the model on a large amount of unlabelled data with consistency regularization to constrain the model predictions to be invariant to input perturbation. However, the existing SSL frameworks still have room for improvement in the consistency regularization method. Instead of regularizing category predictions in the label space as in existing frameworks, this paper proposes a feature space renormalization (FSR) mechanism for SSL. First, we propose a feature space renormalization mechanism to substitute for the commonly used consistency regularization mechanism to learn better discriminative features. To apply this mechanism, we start by building a basic model and an empirical model and then introduce our mechanism to renormalize the feature learning of the basic model with the guidance of the empirical model. Second, we combine the proposed mechanism with pseudo-labelling to obtain a novel effective SSL model named FreMatch. The experimental results show that our method can achieve better performance on a variety of standard SSL benchmark datasets, and the proposed feature space renormalization mechanism can also enhance the performance of other SSL approaches.

Related papers

• Joint Model and Data Sparsification via the Marginal Likelihood [53.29070892356214]
  We propose jointly learning individual feature and sample relevancies, enabling simultaneous model and data sparsification.<n>This symmetric pruning of model and data offers a natural extension that preserves conjugacy.<n> Empirical results across diverse regression tasks affirm that a joint ARD approach consistently yields both sparse and robust prediction models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T13:26:53Z)
• Beyond Parameter Arithmetic: Sparse Complementary Fusion for Distribution-Aware Model Merging [20.429700094073684]
  We propose Sparse Complementary Fusion with reverse KL (SCF-RKL), a novel model merging framework that explicitly controls functional interference through sparse, distribution-aware updates.<n>We evaluate SCF-RKL across a wide range of model scales and architectures, covering both reasoning-focused and instruction-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T08:45:42Z)
• SHAP-Guided Regularization in Machine Learning Models [1.0515439489916734]
  We propose a SHAP-guided regularization framework that incorporates feature importance constraints into model training to enhance both predictive performance and interpretability.<n>Our approach applies entropy-based penalties to encourage sparse, concentrated feature attributions while promoting stability across samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T15:45:38Z)
• Intrinsic Training Signals for Federated Learning Aggregation [10.532838477096055]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed clients while preserving data privacy.<n>This work demonstrates that effective model merging can be achieved solely through existing training signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T13:03:23Z)
• Few-Shot Inspired Generative Zero-Shot Learning [14.66239393852298]
  Generative zero-shot learning (ZSL) methods typically synthesize visual features for unseen classes.<n>We propose FSIGenZ, a few-shot-inspired generative ZSL framework that reduces reliance on large-scale feature synthesis.<n>Experiments on SUN, AwA2, and CUB benchmarks demonstrate that FSIGenZ achieves competitive performance using far fewer synthetic features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T02:39:36Z)
• Leveraging Importance Sampling to Detach Alignment Modules from Large Language Models [50.19188692497892]
  Traditional alignment methods often require retraining large pretrained models.<n>We propose a novel textitResidual Alignment Model (textitRAM) that formalizes the alignment process as a type of importance sampling.<n>We develop a resampling algorithm with iterative token-level decoding to address the common first-token latency issue in comparable methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T08:53:02Z)
• Unbiased Max-Min Embedding Classification for Transductive Few-Shot Learning: Clustering and Classification Are All You Need [83.10178754323955]
  Few-shot learning enables models to generalize from only a few labeled examples. We propose the Unbiased Max-Min Embedding Classification (UMMEC) Method, which addresses the key challenges in few-shot learning. Our method significantly improves classification performance with minimal labeled data, advancing the state-of-the-art in annotatedL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T07:23:07Z)
• High-Performance Few-Shot Segmentation with Foundation Models: An Empirical Study [64.06777376676513]
  We develop a few-shot segmentation (FSS) framework based on foundation models. To be specific, we propose a simple approach to extract implicit knowledge from foundation models to construct coarse correspondence. Experiments on two widely used datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T08:04:11Z)
• Semi-supervised Regression Analysis with Model Misspecification and High-dimensional Data [8.619243141968886]
  We present an inference framework for estimating regression coefficients in conditional mean models. We develop an augmented inverse probability weighted (AIPW) method, employing regularized estimators for both propensity score (PS) and outcome regression (OR) models. Our theoretical findings are verified through extensive simulation studies and a real-world data application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T00:34:54Z)
• GCC: Generative Calibration Clustering [55.44944397168619]
  We propose a novel Generative Clustering (GCC) method to incorporate feature learning and augmentation into clustering procedure. First, we develop a discrimirative feature alignment mechanism to discover intrinsic relationship across real and generated samples. Second, we design a self-supervised metric learning to generate more reliable cluster assignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-14T01:51:11Z)
• Semi-Supervised Class-Agnostic Motion Prediction with Pseudo Label Regeneration and BEVMix [59.55173022987071]
  We study the potential of semi-supervised learning for class-agnostic motion prediction. Our framework adopts a consistency-based self-training paradigm, enabling the model to learn from unlabeled data. Our method exhibits comparable performance to weakly and some fully supervised methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T09:32:50Z)
• Progressive Feature Adjustment for Semi-supervised Learning from Pretrained Models [39.42802115580677]
  Semi-supervised learning (SSL) can leverage both labeled and unlabeled data to build a predictive model. Recent literature suggests that naively applying state-of-the-art SSL with a pretrained model fails to unleash the full potential of training data. We propose to use pseudo-labels from the unlabelled data to update the feature extractor that is less sensitive to incorrect labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-09T01:57:14Z)
• Mixed Semi-Supervised Generalized-Linear-Regression with applications to Deep-Learning and Interpolators [6.537685198688539]
  We present a methodology for using unlabeled data to design semi supervised learning (SSL) methods. We include in each of them a mixing parameter $alpha$, controlling the weight given to the unlabeled data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our methodology in delivering substantial improvement compared to the standard supervised models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T09:55:18Z)
• Benchmark for Uncertainty & Robustness in Self-Supervised Learning [0.0]
  Self-Supervised Learning is crucial for real-world applications, especially in data-hungry domains such as healthcare and self-driving cars. In this paper, we explore variants of SSL methods, including Jigsaw Puzzles, Context, Rotation, Geometric Transformations Prediction for vision, as well as BERT and GPT for language tasks. Our goal is to create a benchmark with outputs from experiments, providing a starting point for new SSL methods in Reliable Machine Learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-23T15:46:23Z)
• Feature Correlation-guided Knowledge Transfer for Federated Self-supervised Learning [19.505644178449046]
  We propose a novel and general method named Federated Self-supervised Learning with Feature-correlation based Aggregation (FedFoA) Our insight is to utilize feature correlation to align the feature mappings and calibrate the local model updates across clients during their local training process. We prove that FedFoA is a model-agnostic training framework and can be easily compatible with state-of-the-art unsupervised FL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-14T13:59:50Z)
• When to Update Your Model: Constrained Model-based Reinforcement Learning [50.74369835934703]
  We propose a novel and general theoretical scheme for a non-decreasing performance guarantee of model-based RL (MBRL) Our follow-up derived bounds reveal the relationship between model shifts and performance improvement. A further example demonstrates that learning models from a dynamically-varying number of explorations benefit the eventual returns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T17:57:43Z)
• How robust are pre-trained models to distribution shift? [82.08946007821184]
  We show how spurious correlations affect the performance of popular self-supervised learning (SSL) and auto-encoder based models (AE) We develop a novel evaluation scheme with the linear head trained on out-of-distribution (OOD) data, to isolate the performance of the pre-trained models from a potential bias of the linear head used for evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T16:18:28Z)
• Control as Hybrid Inference [62.997667081978825]
  We present an implementation of CHI which naturally mediates the balance between iterative and amortised inference. We verify the scalability of our algorithm on a continuous control benchmark, demonstrating that it outperforms strong model-free and model-based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-11T19:44:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.