Ontology-Driven Processing of Transdisciplinary Domain Knowledge

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04910v1
• Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 07:42:34 GMT
• Title: Ontology-Driven Processing of Transdisciplinary Domain Knowledge
• Abstract summary: Modern science is unable to solve real-world problems in a fundamental way. Noosphere thesis appeals to the scientific worldview that needs to be built in a way that overcomes the interdisciplinary barriers.
• Score: 15.819087559924784
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The monograph discusses certain aspects of modern real-world problems facing humanity, which are much more challenging than scientific ones. Modern science is unable to solve them in a fundamental way. Vernadsky's noosphere thesis, in fact, appeals to the scientific worldview that needs to be built in a way that overcomes the interdisciplinary barriers and increases the effectiveness of interdisciplinary interaction and modern science overall. We are talking about the general transdisciplinary knowledge. In world practice, there is still no systematic methodology and a specific form of generally accepted valid scientific theory that would provide transdisciplinary knowledge. Non-linear interdisciplinary interaction is the standard of evolution of modern science. At the same time, a new transdisciplinary theory (domain of scientific research) is being de facto created and the process is repeated many times: from an individual or group of disciplines, through interdisciplinary interaction, in a direction that brings us closer to creating a holistic general scientific worldview.

Related papers

• Towards a new paradigm of scientific discovery with socialized artificial intelligence [48.48034861871986]
  We introduce Bridging Literature, Agents, and Zero-gap Experimentation (BLAZE), a paradigm of socialized scientific intelligence.<n>BLAZE conceives AI not as an assistant for isolated research tasks, but as an organizational infrastructure for scientific discovery.<n>Its purpose is not to replace human discovery, but to extend the scale, depth, and continuity of collective scientific inquiry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T18:18:39Z)
• The Non-Optimality of Scientific Knowledge: Path Dependence, Lock-In, and The Local Minimum Trap [0.2538209532048867]
  We argue that science follows the steepest local gradient of tractability, empirical accessibility, and institutional reward.<n>We identify three interlocking mechanisms of lock-in-cognitive, formal, and institutional--and argue that recognizing these mechanisms is a prerequisite for designing meta-scientific strategies capable of escaping local optima.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-11T17:09:43Z)
• Embodied Science: Closing the Discovery Loop with Agentic Embodied AI [73.54118756665221]
  We argue for embodied science, a paradigm that reframes scientific discovery as a closed loop tightly coupling agentic reasoning with physical execution.<n>We propose a unified Perception-Language-Action-Discovery (PLAD) framework, wherein embodied agents perceive experimental environments, reason over scientific knowledge, execute physical interventions, and internalize outcomes to drive subsequent exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T09:20:12Z)
• Autonomous Agents for Scientific Discovery: Orchestrating Scientists, Language, Code, and Physics [82.55776608452017]
  Large language models (LLMs) provide a flexible and versatile framework that orchestrates interactions with human scientists, natural language, computer language and code, and physics.<n>This paper presents our view and vision of LLM-based scientific agents and their growing role in transforming the scientific discovery lifecycle.<n>We identify open research challenges and outline promising directions for building more robust, generalizable, and adaptive scientific agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T22:26:26Z)
• Scaling Laws in Scientific Discovery with AI and Robot Scientists [72.3420699173245]
  An autonomous generalist scientist (AGS) concept combines agentic AI and embodied robotics to automate the entire research lifecycle. AGS aims to significantly reduce the time and resources needed for scientific discovery. As these autonomous systems become increasingly integrated into the research process, we hypothesize that scientific discovery might adhere to new scaling laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T14:00:27Z)
• Position: Multimodal Large Language Models Can Significantly Advance Scientific Reasoning [51.11965014462375]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) integrate text, images, and other modalities. This paper argues that MLLMs can significantly advance scientific reasoning across disciplines such as mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T04:05:27Z)
• Two Heads Are Better Than One: A Multi-Agent System Has the Potential to Improve Scientific Idea Generation [48.29699224989952]
  VirSci organizes a team of agents to collaboratively generate, evaluate, and refine research ideas. We show that this multi-agent approach outperforms the state-of-the-art method in producing novel and impactful scientific ideas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T07:16:22Z)
• Automating the Practice of Science -- Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications [48.54225838534946]
  This article evaluates the scope of automation within scientific practice and assesses recent approaches. By discussing the motivations behind automated science, analyzing the hurdles encountered, and examining its implications, this article invites researchers, policymakers, and stakeholders to navigate the frontier of automated scientific practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T15:51:31Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discovery [68.48094108571432]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the way text and other modalities of data are handled. We aim to provide a more holistic view of the research landscape by unveiling cross-field and cross-modal connections between scientific LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T08:03:24Z)
• Towards a Theoretical Foundation of Process Science [1.4372498385359374]
  Process science is a highly interdisciplinary field of research. Despite numerous proposals, process science lacks an adequate understanding of the core concepts of the field. A more systematic framework to cope with process science is mandatory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T08:19:39Z)
• A Review of Neuroscience-Inspired Machine Learning [58.72729525961739]
  Bio-plausible credit assignment is compatible with practically any learning condition and is energy-efficient. In this paper, we survey several vital algorithms that model bio-plausible rules of credit assignment in artificial neural networks. We conclude by discussing the future challenges that will need to be addressed in order to make such algorithms more useful in practical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T18:05:09Z)
• Scientific Large Language Models: A Survey on Biological & Chemical Domains [47.97810890521825]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a transformative power in enhancing natural language comprehension. The application of LLMs extends beyond conventional linguistic boundaries, encompassing specialized linguistic systems developed within various scientific disciplines. As a burgeoning area in the community of AI for Science, scientific LLMs warrant comprehensive exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T05:33:34Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for Science in Quantum, Atomistic, and Continuum Systems [268.585904751315]
  New area of research known as AI for science (AI4Science) Areas aim at understanding the physical world from subatomic (wavefunctions and electron density), atomic (molecules, proteins, materials, and interactions), to macro (fluids, climate, and subsurface) scales. Key common challenge is how to capture physics first principles, especially symmetries, in natural systems by deep learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T12:14:14Z)
• Science and Technology Ontology: A Taxonomy of Emerging Topics [6.4429045013848185]
  We present an automatic Science and Technology Ontology (S&TO) that covers unconventional topics in different science and technology. The proposed S&TO can promote the discovery of new research areas and collaborations across disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-06T14:04:24Z)
• On the importance of AI research beyond disciplines [7.022779279820803]
  It is crucial to embrace interdisciplinary knowledge to understand the impact of technology on society. The goal is to foster a research environment beyond disciplines that values diversity and creates, critiques and develops new conceptual and theoretical frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T19:39:37Z)
• Biological Robots: Perspectives on an Emerging Interdisciplinary Field [0.0]
  We discuss issues at the intersection of developmental biology, computer science, and robotics. In the context of biological robots, we explore changes across concepts and previously distinct fields. We hope new fields can emerge as boundaries arising from technological limitations are overcome.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-02T17:06:43Z)
• Measuring Disagreement in Science [0.0]
  We use a cue-phrase based approach to identify instances of disagreement citations across more than four million scientific articles. We reveal a disciplinary spectrum of disagreement, with higher disagreement in the social sciences and lower disagreement in physics and mathematics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-30T14:07:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.