Finding Software Vulnerabilities in Open-Source C Projects via Bounded Model Checking

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05281v1
• Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 11:25:24 GMT
• Title: Finding Software Vulnerabilities in Open-Source C Projects via Bounded Model Checking
• Authors: Janislley Oliveira de Sousa and Bruno Carvalho de Farias and Thales Araujo da Silva and Eddie Batista de Lima Filho and Lucas C. Cordeiro
• Abstract summary: We advocate that bounded model-checking techniques can efficiently detect vulnerabilities in general software systems. We have developed and evaluated a methodology to verify large software systems using a state-of-the-art bounded model checker.
• Score: 2.9129603096077332
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Computer-based systems have solved several domain problems, including industrial, military, education, and wearable. Nevertheless, such arrangements need high-quality software to guarantee security and safety as both are mandatory for modern software products. We advocate that bounded model-checking techniques can efficiently detect vulnerabilities in general software systems. However, such an approach struggles to scale up and verify extensive code bases. Consequently, we have developed and evaluated a methodology to verify large software systems using a state-of-the-art bounded model checker. In particular, we pre-process input source-code files and guide the respective model checker to explore them systematically. Moreover, the proposed scheme includes a function-wise prioritization strategy, which readily provides results for code entities according to a scale of importance. Experimental results using a real implementation of the proposed methodology show that it can efficiently verify large software systems. Besides, it presented low peak memory allocation when executed. We have evaluated our approach by verifying twelve popular open-source C projects, where we have found real software vulnerabilities that their developers confirmed.

Related papers

• A Combined Feature Embedding Tools for Multi-Class Software Defect and Identification [2.2020053359163305]
  We present CodeGraphNet, an experimental method that combines GraphCodeBERT and Graph Convolutional Network approaches. This method captures intricate relation- ships between features, providing for more exact identification and separation of vulnerabilities. The DeepTree model, which is a hybrid of a Decision Tree and a Neural Network, outperforms state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T17:33:02Z)
• Divide and Conquer based Symbolic Vulnerability Detection [0.16385815610837165]
  This paper presents a vulnerability detection approach based on symbolic execution and control flow graph analysis. Our approach employs a divide-and-conquer algorithm to eliminate irrelevant program information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-20T13:09:07Z)
• Patch2QL: Discover Cognate Defects in Open Source Software Supply Chain With Auto-generated Static Analysis Rules [1.9591497166224197]
  We propose a novel technique for detecting cognate defects in OSS through the automatic generation of SAST rules. Specifically, it extracts key syntax and semantic information from pre- and post-patch versions of code. We have implemented a prototype tool called Patch2QL and applied it to fundamental OSS in C/C++.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T02:23:11Z)
• Causative Insights into Open Source Software Security using Large Language Code Embeddings and Semantic Vulnerability Graph [3.623199159688412]
  Open Source Software (OSS) vulnerabilities can cause unauthorized access, data breaches, network disruptions, and privacy violations. Recent deep-learning techniques have shown great promise in identifying and localizing vulnerabilities in source code. Our study shows a 24% improvement in code repair capabilities compared to previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T10:33:22Z)
• A Novel Approach to Identify Security Controls in Source Code [4.598579706242066]
  This paper enumerates a comprehensive list of commonly used security controls and creates a dataset for each one of them. It uses the state-of-the-art NLP technique Bidirectional Representations from Transformers (BERT) and the Tactic Detector from our prior work to show that security controls could be identified with high confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T21:14:39Z)
• CodeLMSec Benchmark: Systematically Evaluating and Finding Security Vulnerabilities in Black-Box Code Language Models [58.27254444280376]
  Large language models (LLMs) for automatic code generation have achieved breakthroughs in several programming tasks. Training data for these models is usually collected from the Internet (e.g., from open-source repositories) and is likely to contain faults and security vulnerabilities. This unsanitized training data can cause the language models to learn these vulnerabilities and propagate them during the code generation procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T11:54:07Z)
• Lessons from Formally Verified Deployed Software Systems (Extended version) [65.69802414600832]
  This article examines a range of projects, in various application areas, that have produced formally verified systems and deployed them for actual use. It considers the technologies used, the form of verification applied, the results obtained, and the lessons that the software industry should draw regarding its ability to benefit from formal verification techniques and tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-05T18:18:46Z)
• Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical Tasks [70.76757529955577]
  This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL. We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection. To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z)
• Recursively Feasible Probabilistic Safe Online Learning with Control Barrier Functions [60.26921219698514]
  We introduce a model-uncertainty-aware reformulation of CBF-based safety-critical controllers. We then present the pointwise feasibility conditions of the resulting safety controller. We use these conditions to devise an event-triggered online data collection strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-23T05:02:09Z)
• Increasing the Confidence of Deep Neural Networks by Coverage Analysis [71.57324258813674]
  This paper presents a lightweight monitoring architecture based on coverage paradigms to enhance the model against different unsafe inputs. Experimental results show that the proposed approach is effective in detecting both powerful adversarial examples and out-of-distribution inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-28T16:38:26Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.