Practical Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Large Language Models via Self-prompt Calibration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.06062v3
• Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:36:02 GMT
• Title: Practical Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Large Language Models via Self-prompt Calibration
• Authors: Wenjie Fu, Huandong Wang, Chen Gao, Guanghua Liu, Yong Li, Tao Jiang,
• Abstract summary: Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) aim to infer whether a target data record has been utilized for model training or not. We propose a Membership Inference Attack based on Self-calibrated Probabilistic Variation (SPV-MIA) Specifically, since memorization in LLMs is inevitable during the training process and occurs before overfitting, we introduce a more reliable membership signal.
• Score: 32.15773300068426
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Membership Inference Attacks (MIA) aim to infer whether a target data record has been utilized for model training or not. Prior attempts have quantified the privacy risks of language models (LMs) via MIAs, but there is still no consensus on whether existing MIA algorithms can cause remarkable privacy leakage on practical Large Language Models (LLMs). Existing MIAs designed for LMs can be classified into two categories: reference-free and reference-based attacks. They are both based on the hypothesis that training records consistently strike a higher probability of being sampled. Nevertheless, this hypothesis heavily relies on the overfitting of target models, which will be mitigated by multiple regularization methods and the generalization of LLMs. The reference-based attack seems to achieve promising effectiveness in LLMs, which measures a more reliable membership signal by comparing the probability discrepancy between the target model and the reference model. However, the performance of reference-based attack is highly dependent on a reference dataset that closely resembles the training dataset, which is usually inaccessible in the practical scenario. Overall, existing MIAs are unable to effectively unveil privacy leakage over practical fine-tuned LLMs that are overfitting-free and private. We propose a Membership Inference Attack based on Self-calibrated Probabilistic Variation (SPV-MIA). Specifically, since memorization in LLMs is inevitable during the training process and occurs before overfitting, we introduce a more reliable membership signal, probabilistic variation, which is based on memorization rather than overfitting. Furthermore, we introduce a self-prompt approach, which constructs the dataset to fine-tune the reference model by prompting the target LLM itself. In this manner, the adversary can collect a dataset with a similar distribution from public APIs.

Related papers

• Detecting Training Data of Large Language Models via Expectation Maximization [62.28028046993391]
  Membership inference attacks (MIAs) aim to determine whether a specific instance was part of a target model's training data. Applying MIAs to large language models (LLMs) presents unique challenges due to the massive scale of pre-training data and the ambiguous nature of membership. We introduce EM-MIA, a novel MIA method for LLMs that iteratively refines membership scores and prefix scores via an expectation-maximization algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T03:31:16Z)
• SoK: Membership Inference Attacks on LLMs are Rushing Nowhere (and How to Fix It) [16.673210422615348]
  More than 10 new methods have been proposed to perform Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) against LLMs. Contrary to traditional MIAs which rely on fixed -- but randomized -- records or models, these methods are mostly evaluated on datasets collected post-hoc. This lack of randomization raises concerns of a distribution shift between members and non-members.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T23:12:07Z)
• Noisy Neighbors: Efficient membership inference attacks against LLMs [2.666596421430287]
  This paper introduces an efficient methodology that generates textitnoisy neighbors for a target sample by adding noise in the embedding space. Our findings demonstrate that this approach closely matches the effectiveness of employing shadow models, showing its usability in practical privacy auditing scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T12:02:20Z)
• ReCaLL: Membership Inference via Relative Conditional Log-Likelihoods [56.073335779595475]
  We propose ReCaLL (Relative Conditional Log-Likelihood), a novel membership inference attack (MIA) ReCaLL examines the relative change in conditional log-likelihoods when prefixing target data points with non-member context. We conduct comprehensive experiments and show that ReCaLL achieves state-of-the-art performance on the WikiMIA dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T00:23:13Z)
• Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
  Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode. We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z)
• Alpaca against Vicuna: Using LLMs to Uncover Memorization of LLMs [61.04246774006429]
  We introduce a black-box prompt optimization method that uses an attacker LLM agent to uncover higher levels of memorization in a victim agent. We observe that our instruction-based prompts generate outputs with 23.7% higher overlap with training data compared to the baseline prefix-suffix measurements. Our findings show that instruction-tuned models can expose pre-training data as much as their base-models, if not more so, and using instructions proposed by other LLMs can open a new avenue of automated attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T19:32:01Z)
• Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models? [141.2019867466968]
  Membership inference attacks (MIAs) attempt to predict whether a particular datapoint is a member of a target model's training data. We perform a large-scale evaluation of MIAs over a suite of language models trained on the Pile, ranging from 160M to 12B parameters. We find that MIAs barely outperform random guessing for most settings across varying LLM sizes and domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T17:52:05Z)
• Unstoppable Attack: Label-Only Model Inversion via Conditional Diffusion Model [14.834360664780709]
  Model attacks (MIAs) aim to recover private data from inaccessible training sets of deep learning models. This paper develops a novel MIA method, leveraging a conditional diffusion model (CDM) to recover representative samples under the target label. Experimental results show that this method can generate similar and accurate samples to the target label, outperforming generators of previous approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T12:14:24Z)
• RelaxLoss: Defending Membership Inference Attacks without Losing Utility [68.48117818874155]
  We propose a novel training framework based on a relaxed loss with a more achievable learning target. RelaxLoss is applicable to any classification model with added benefits of easy implementation and negligible overhead. Our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art defense mechanisms in terms of resilience against MIAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-12T19:34:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.