Simulating Opinion Dynamics with Networks of LLM-based Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09618v4
- Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 01:12:35 GMT
- Title: Simulating Opinion Dynamics with Networks of LLM-based Agents
- Authors: Yun-Shiuan Chuang, Agam Goyal, Nikunj Harlalka, Siddharth Suresh, Robert Hawkins, Sijia Yang, Dhavan Shah, Junjie Hu, Timothy T. Rogers,
- Abstract summary: We propose a new approach to simulating opinion dynamics based on populations of Large Language Models (LLMs)
Our findings reveal a strong inherent bias in LLM agents towards producing accurate information, leading simulated agents to consensus in line with scientific reality.
After inducing confirmation bias through prompt engineering, however, we observed opinion fragmentation in line with existing agent-based modeling and opinion dynamics research.
- Score: 7.697132934635411
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Accurately simulating human opinion dynamics is crucial for understanding a variety of societal phenomena, including polarization and the spread of misinformation. However, the agent-based models (ABMs) commonly used for such simulations often over-simplify human behavior. We propose a new approach to simulating opinion dynamics based on populations of Large Language Models (LLMs). Our findings reveal a strong inherent bias in LLM agents towards producing accurate information, leading simulated agents to consensus in line with scientific reality. This bias limits their utility for understanding resistance to consensus views on issues like climate change. After inducing confirmation bias through prompt engineering, however, we observed opinion fragmentation in line with existing agent-based modeling and opinion dynamics research. These insights highlight the promise and limitations of LLM agents in this domain and suggest a path forward: refining LLMs with real-world discourse to better simulate the evolution of human beliefs.
Related papers
- SocioVerse: A World Model for Social Simulation Powered by LLM Agents and A Pool of 10 Million Real-World Users [70.02370111025617]
We introduce SocioVerse, an agent-driven world model for social simulation.
Our framework features four powerful alignment components and a user pool of 10 million real individuals.
Results demonstrate that SocioVerse can reflect large-scale population dynamics while ensuring diversity, credibility, and representativeness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-14T12:12:52Z) - From ChatGPT to DeepSeek: Can LLMs Simulate Humanity? [32.93460040317926]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a promising method for exploring complex human social behaviors.
Recent studies highlight discrepancies between simulated and real-world interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T13:54:47Z) - Large Language Model Driven Agents for Simulating Echo Chamber Formation [5.6488384323017]
The rise of echo chambers on social media platforms has heightened concerns about polarization and the reinforcement of existing beliefs.
Traditional approaches for simulating echo chamber formation have often relied on predefined rules and numerical simulations.
We present a novel framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) as generative agents to simulate echo chamber dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T12:05:11Z) - Can LLMs Simulate Social Media Engagement? A Study on Action-Guided Response Generation [51.44040615856536]
This paper analyzes large language models' ability to simulate social media engagement through action guided response generation.
We benchmark GPT-4o-mini, O1-mini, and DeepSeek-R1 in social media engagement simulation regarding a major societal event.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T17:43:08Z) - Emergence of human-like polarization among large language model agents [61.622596148368906]
We simulate a networked system involving thousands of large language model agents, discovering their social interactions, result in human-like polarization.
Similarities between humans and LLM agents raise concerns about their capacity to amplify societal polarization, but also hold the potential to serve as a valuable testbed for identifying plausible strategies to mitigate it.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-09T11:45:05Z) - Sense and Sensitivity: Evaluating the simulation of social dynamics via Large Language Models [27.313165173789233]
Large language models have been proposed as a powerful replacement for classical agent-based models (ABMs) to simulate social dynamics.
However, due to the black box nature of LLMs, it is unclear whether LLM agents actually execute the intended semantics.
We show that while it is possible to engineer prompts that approximate the intended dynamics, the quality of these simulations is highly sensitive to the particular choice of prompts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-06T14:50:01Z) - Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication.
In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness.
Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z) - Fusing Dynamics Equation: A Social Opinions Prediction Algorithm with LLM-based Agents [6.1923703280119105]
This paper proposes an innovative simulation method for the dynamics of social media user opinions.
The FDE-LLM algorithm incorporates opinion dynamics and epidemic model.
It categorizes users into opinion leaders and followers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-13T11:02:28Z) - PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
We propose PersLLM, integrating psychology-grounded principles of personality: social practice, consistency, and dynamic development.
We incorporate personality traits directly into the model parameters, enhancing the model's resistance to induction, promoting consistency, and supporting the dynamic evolution of personality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z) - LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific Discovery [141.39722070734737]
We propose to enhance the knowledge-driven, abstract reasoning abilities of Large Language Models with the computational strength of simulations.
We introduce Scientific Generative Agent (SGA), a bilevel optimization framework.
We conduct experiments to demonstrate our framework's efficacy in law discovery and molecular design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-16T03:04:10Z) - Explaining Large Language Models Decisions Using Shapley Values [1.223779595809275]
Large language models (LLMs) have opened up exciting possibilities for simulating human behavior and cognitive processes.
However, the validity of utilizing LLMs as stand-ins for human subjects remains uncertain.
This paper presents a novel approach based on Shapley values to interpret LLM behavior and quantify the relative contribution of each prompt component to the model's output.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-29T22:49:43Z) - What if...?: Thinking Counterfactual Keywords Helps to Mitigate Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models [50.97705264224828]
We propose Counterfactual Inception, a novel method that implants counterfactual thinking into Large Multi-modal Models.
We aim for the models to engage with and generate responses that span a wider contextual scene understanding.
Comprehensive analyses across various LMMs, including both open-source and proprietary models, corroborate that counterfactual thinking significantly reduces hallucination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-20T11:27:20Z) - LLM-driven Imitation of Subrational Behavior : Illusion or Reality? [3.2365468114603937]
Existing work highlights the ability of Large Language Models to address complex reasoning tasks and mimic human communication.
We propose to investigate the use of LLMs to generate synthetic human demonstrations, which are then used to learn subrational agent policies.
We experimentally evaluate the ability of our framework to model sub-rationality through four simple scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-13T19:46:39Z) - Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates [12.933509143906141]
We study the limitations of Large Language Models in simulating human interactions.
Our findings indicate a tendency for LLM agents to conform to the model's inherent social biases.
These results underscore the need for further research to develop methods that help agents overcome these biases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-06T14:51:55Z) - Large Language Models as Subpopulation Representative Models: A Review [5.439020425819001]
Large language models (LLMs) could be used to estimate subpopulation representative models (SRMs)
LLMs could provide an alternate or complementary way to measure public opinion among demographic, geographic, or political segments of the population.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-27T04:31:27Z) - CoMPosT: Characterizing and Evaluating Caricature in LLM Simulations [61.9212914612875]
We present a framework to characterize LLM simulations using four dimensions: Context, Model, Persona, and Topic.
We use this framework to measure open-ended LLM simulations' susceptibility to caricature, defined via two criteria: individuation and exaggeration.
We find that for GPT-4, simulations of certain demographics (political and marginalized groups) and topics (general, uncontroversial) are highly susceptible to caricature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-17T18:00:25Z) - Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback for Realistic Traffic
Simulation [53.85002640149283]
Key element of effective simulation is the incorporation of realistic traffic models that align with human knowledge.
This study identifies two main challenges: capturing the nuances of human preferences on realism and the unification of diverse traffic simulation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-01T19:29:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.