Is Your Anomaly Detector Ready for Change? Adapting AIOps Solutions to the Real World

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10421v2
• Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:28:22 GMT
• Title: Is Your Anomaly Detector Ready for Change? Adapting AIOps Solutions to the Real World
• Authors: Lorena Poenaru-Olaru, Natalia Karpova, Luis Cruz, Jan Rellermeyer, Arie van Deursen,
• Abstract summary: We analyze two different anomaly detection model maintenance techniques in terms of the model update frequency. We investigate whether a data change monitoring tool is capable of determining when the anomaly detection model needs to be updated through retraining.
• Score: 15.1355549683548
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Anomaly detection techniques are essential in automating the monitoring of IT systems and operations. These techniques imply that machine learning algorithms are trained on operational data corresponding to a specific period of time and that they are continuously evaluated on newly emerging data. Operational data is constantly changing over time, which affects the performance of deployed anomaly detection models. Therefore, continuous model maintenance is required to preserve the performance of anomaly detectors over time. In this work, we analyze two different anomaly detection model maintenance techniques in terms of the model update frequency, namely blind model retraining and informed model retraining. We further investigate the effects of updating the model by retraining it on all the available data (full-history approach) and only the newest data (sliding window approach). Moreover, we investigate whether a data change monitoring tool is capable of determining when the anomaly detection model needs to be updated through retraining.

Related papers

• TeVAE: A Variational Autoencoder Approach for Discrete Online Anomaly Detection in Variable-state Multivariate Time-series Data [0.017476232824732776]
  We propose a temporal variational autoencoder (TeVAE) that can detect anomalies with minimal false positives when trained on unlabelled data. When properly configured, TeVAE flags anomalies only 6% of the time wrongly and detects 65% of anomalies present.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T13:32:33Z)
• Early-Stage Anomaly Detection: A Study of Model Performance on Complete vs. Partial Flows [0.0]
  This study investigates the efficacy of machine learning models, specifically Random Forest, in anomaly detection systems. We explore the performance disparity that arises when models are applied to incomplete data typical in real-world, real-time network environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T07:14:25Z)
• Distilled Datamodel with Reverse Gradient Matching [74.75248610868685]
  We introduce an efficient framework for assessing data impact, comprising offline training and online evaluation stages. Our proposed method achieves comparable model behavior evaluation while significantly speeding up the process compared to the direct retraining method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T09:16:14Z)
• Temporal Knowledge Distillation for Time-Sensitive Financial Services Applications [7.1795069620810805]
  Anomaly detection is frequently used in key compliance and risk functions such as financial crime detection fraud and cybersecurity. Keeping up with the rapid changes by retraining the models with the latest data patterns introduces pressures in balancing the historical and current patterns. The proposed approach provides advantages in retraining times while improving the model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T03:04:30Z)
• LARA: A Light and Anti-overfitting Retraining Approach for Unsupervised Time Series Anomaly Detection [49.52429991848581]
  We propose a Light and Anti-overfitting Retraining Approach (LARA) for deep variational auto-encoder based time series anomaly detection methods (VAEs) This work aims to make three novel contributions: 1) the retraining process is formulated as a convex problem and can converge at a fast rate as well as prevent overfitting; 2) designing a ruminate block, which leverages the historical data without the need to store them; and 3) mathematically proving that when fine-tuning the latent vector and reconstructed data, the linear formations can achieve the least adjusting errors between the ground truths and the fine-tuned ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T12:36:16Z)
• Monitoring Machine Learning Models: Online Detection of Relevant Deviations [0.0]
  Machine learning models can degrade over time due to changes in data distribution or other factors. We propose a sequential monitoring scheme to detect relevant changes. Our research contributes a practical solution for distinguishing between minor fluctuations and meaningful degradations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-26T18:46:37Z)
• Representing Timed Automata and Timing Anomalies of Cyber-Physical Production Systems in Knowledge Graphs [51.98400002538092]
  This paper aims to improve model-based anomaly detection in CPPS by combining the learned timed automaton with a formal knowledge graph about the system. Both the model and the detected anomalies are described in the knowledge graph in order to allow operators an easier interpretation of the model and the detected anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T15:25:57Z)
• Safe AI for health and beyond -- Monitoring to transform a health service [51.8524501805308]
  We will assess the infrastructure required to monitor the outputs of a machine learning algorithm. We will present two scenarios with examples of monitoring and updates of models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T17:27:45Z)
• PULL: Reactive Log Anomaly Detection Based On Iterative PU Learning [58.85063149619348]
  We propose PULL, an iterative log analysis method for reactive anomaly detection based on estimated failure time windows. Our evaluation shows that PULL consistently outperforms ten benchmark baselines across three different datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-25T16:34:43Z)
• Monte Carlo EM for Deep Time Series Anomaly Detection [6.312089019297173]
  Time series data are often corrupted by outliers or other kinds of anomalies. Recent approaches to anomaly detection and forecasting assume that the proportion of anomalies in the training data is small enough to ignore. We present a technique for augmenting existing time series models so that they explicitly account for anomalies in the training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-29T07:52:36Z)
• DAE : Discriminatory Auto-Encoder for multivariate time-series anomaly detection in air transportation [68.8204255655161]
  We propose a novel anomaly detection model called Discriminatory Auto-Encoder (DAE) It uses the baseline of a regular LSTM-based auto-encoder but with several decoders, each getting data of a specific flight phase. Results show that the DAE achieves better results in both accuracy and speed of detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-08T14:07:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.