Deep Neural Decision Forest: A Novel Approach for Predicting Recovery or
Decease of COVID-19 Patients with Clinical and RT-PCR
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.13925v2
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 07:27:57 GMT
- Title: Deep Neural Decision Forest: A Novel Approach for Predicting Recovery or
Decease of COVID-19 Patients with Clinical and RT-PCR
- Authors: Mohammad Dehghani, Zahra Yazdanparast, Rasoul Samani
- Abstract summary: This study aims to examine whether deep learning algorithms can predict a patient's morality.
We investigated the impact of Clinical and RT-PCR on prediction to determine which one is more reliable.
Results indicate that Clinical alone (without the use of RT-PCR) is the most effective method of diagnosis, with an accuracy of 80%.
- Score: 0.3013529669049775
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: COVID-19 continues to be considered an endemic disease in spite of the World
Health Organization's declaration that the pandemic is over. This pandemic has
disrupted people's lives in unprecedented ways and caused widespread morbidity
and mortality. As a result, it is important for emergency physicians to
identify patients with a higher mortality risk in order to prioritize hospital
equipment, especially in areas with limited medical services. The collected
data from patients is beneficial to predict the outcome of COVID-19 cases,
although there is a question about which data makes the most accurate
predictions. Therefore, this study aims to accomplish two main objectives.
First, we want to examine whether deep learning algorithms can predict a
patient's morality. Second, we investigated the impact of Clinical and RT-PCR
on prediction to determine which one is more reliable. We defined four stages
with different feature sets and used interpretable deep learning methods to
build appropriate model. Based on results, the deep neural decision forest
performed the best across all stages and proved its capability to predict the
recovery and death of patients. Additionally, results indicate that Clinical
alone (without the use of RT-PCR) is the most effective method of diagnosis,
with an accuracy of 80%. It is important to document and understand experiences
from the COVID-19 pandemic in order to aid future medical efforts. This study
can provide guidance for medical professionals in the event of a crisis or
outbreak similar to COVID-19.
Related papers
- COVID-Net Biochem: An Explainability-driven Framework to Building
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Survival and Kidney Injury of COVID-19
Patients from Clinical and Biochemistry Data [66.43957431843324]
We introduce COVID-Net Biochem, a versatile and explainable framework for constructing machine learning models.
We apply this framework to predict COVID-19 patient survival and the likelihood of developing Acute Kidney Injury during hospitalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-24T07:38:37Z) - COVID-Net Clinical ICU: Enhanced Prediction of ICU Admission for
COVID-19 Patients via Explainability and Trust Quantification [71.80459780697956]
We introduce COVID-Net Clinical ICU, a neural network for ICU admission prediction based on patient clinical data.
The proposed COVID-Net Clinical ICU was built using a clinical dataset from Hospital Sirio-Libanes comprising of 1,925 COVID-19 patients.
We conducted system-level insight discovery using a quantitative explainability strategy to study the decision-making impact of different clinical features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-14T14:16:32Z) - COVIDx-US -- An open-access benchmark dataset of ultrasound imaging data
for AI-driven COVID-19 analytics [116.6248556979572]
COVIDx-US is an open-access benchmark dataset of COVID-19 related ultrasound imaging data.
It consists of 93 lung ultrasound videos and 10,774 processed images of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, non-SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, as well as healthy control cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-18T03:31:33Z) - Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised
Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks.
Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets.
We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z) - Challenges in the application of a mortality prediction model for
COVID-19 patients on an Indian cohort [0.0]
Yan et al. 1 have published a research that uses Machine learning (ML) methods to predict the outcome of COVID-19 patients.
Here, we show the limitations of this model by deploying it on one of the largest datasets of COVID-19 patients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-15T07:06:49Z) - AIforCOVID: predicting the clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19
applying AI to chest-X-rays. An Italian multicentre study [7.456548336226919]
We investigate whether chest X-ray (CXR) can be used as a possible tool for the early identification of patients at risk of severe outcome, like intensive care or death.
CXR is a radiological technique that compared to computed tomography (CT) it is simpler, faster, more widespread and it induces lower radiation dose.
We present a dataset including data collected from 820 patients by six Italian hospitals in spring 2020 during the first COVID-19 emergency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-11T18:03:08Z) - Classification supporting COVID-19 diagnostics based on patient survey
data [82.41449972618423]
logistic regression and XGBoost classifiers, that allow for effective screening of patients for COVID-19 were generated.
The obtained classification models provided the basis for the DECODE service (decode.polsl.pl), which can serve as support in screening patients with COVID-19 disease.
This data set consists of more than 3,000 examples is based on questionnaires collected at a hospital in Poland.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-24T17:44:01Z) - Predicting Patient COVID-19 Disease Severity by means of Statistical and
Machine Learning Analysis of Blood Cell Transcriptome Data [3.5699804146136676]
We investigated how such data from the peripheral blood of COVID-19 patients might be used to predict clinical outcomes.
Our work revealed several clinical parameters measurable in blood samples, which discriminated between healthy people and COVID-19 positive patients.
We thus developed a number of analytic methods that showed accuracy and precision for disease severity and mortality outcome predictions that were above 90%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-19T10:32:46Z) - Integrative Analysis for COVID-19 Patient Outcome Prediction [53.11258640541513]
We combine radiomics of lung opacities and non-imaging features from demographic data, vital signs, and laboratory findings to predict need for intensive care unit admission.
Our methods may also be applied to other lung diseases including but not limited to community acquired pneumonia.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-20T19:08:50Z) - CovidCare: Transferring Knowledge from Existing EMR to Emerging Epidemic
for Interpretable Prognosis [20.701122594508675]
We propose a deep-learning-based approach, CovidCare, to enhance the prognosis for inpatients with emerging infectious diseases.
CovidCare learns to embed the COVID-19-related medical features based on massive existing EMR data via transfer learning.
We conduct the length of stay prediction experiments for patients on a real-world COVID-19 dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-17T09:20:56Z) - From predictions to prescriptions: A data-driven response to COVID-19 [42.57407485467993]
We propose a comprehensive data-driven approach to understand the clinical characteristics of COVID-19.
We build personalized calculators to predict the risk of infection and mortality.
We propose an optimization model to re-allocate ventilators and alleviate shortages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-30T03:34:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.