Survey on AI Ethics: A Socio-technical Perspective
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17228v1
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 21:00:56 GMT
- Title: Survey on AI Ethics: A Socio-technical Perspective
- Authors: Dave Mbiazi, Meghana Bhange, Maryam Babaei, Ivaxi Sheth, Patrik Joslin
Kenfack
- Abstract summary: Ethical concerns associated with AI are multifaceted, including challenging issues of fairness, privacy and data protection, responsibility and accountability, safety and robustness, transparency and explainability, and environmental impact.
This work unifies the current and future ethical concerns of deploying AI into society.
- Score: 0.9374652839580183
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The past decade has observed a great advancement in AI with deep
learning-based models being deployed in diverse scenarios including
safety-critical applications. As these AI systems become deeply embedded in our
societal infrastructure, the repercussions of their decisions and actions have
significant consequences, making the ethical implications of AI deployment
highly relevant and important. The ethical concerns associated with AI are
multifaceted, including challenging issues of fairness, privacy and data
protection, responsibility and accountability, safety and robustness,
transparency and explainability, and environmental impact. These principles
together form the foundations of ethical AI considerations that concern every
stakeholder in the AI system lifecycle. In light of the present ethical and
future x-risk concerns, governments have shown increasing interest in
establishing guidelines for the ethical deployment of AI. This work unifies the
current and future ethical concerns of deploying AI into society. While we
acknowledge and appreciate the technical surveys for each of the ethical
principles concerned, in this paper, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview
that not only addresses each principle from a technical point of view but also
discusses them from a social perspective.
Related papers
- Ethical Considerations for the Military Use of Artificial Intelligence in Visual Reconnaissance [3.7777991510059286]
This white paper emphasizes the critical importance of responsibly deploying Artificial Intelligence (AI) in military contexts.
The paper delves into ethical AI principles, particularly focusing on the Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) guidelines.
The application of these ethical principles is discussed on the basis of three use cases in the domains of sea, air, and land.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-05T17:16:39Z) - Technology as uncharted territory: Contextual integrity and the notion of AI as new ethical ground [55.2480439325792]
I argue that efforts to promote responsible and ethical AI can inadvertently contribute to and seemingly legitimize this disregard for established contextual norms.
I question the current narrow prioritization in AI ethics of moral innovation over moral preservation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-06T15:36:13Z) - From Principles to Practice: A Deep Dive into AI Ethics and Regulations [13.753819576072127]
The article thoroughly analyzes the ground-breaking AI regulatory framework proposed by the European Union.
Considering the technical efforts and strategies undertaken by academics and industry to uphold these principles, we explore the synergies and conflicts among the five ethical principles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-06T00:46:20Z) - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair
Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture.
This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias.
In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z) - A Review of the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and its Applications
in the United States [0.0]
The paper highlights the impact AI has in every sector of the US economy and the resultant effect on entities spanning businesses, government, academia, and civil society.
Our discussion explores eleven fundamental 'ethical principles' structured as overarching themes.
These encompass Transparency, Justice, Fairness, Equity, Non- Maleficence, Responsibility, Accountability, Privacy, Beneficence, Freedom, Autonomy, Trust, Dignity, Sustainability, and Solidarity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T14:29:00Z) - AI Ethics: An Empirical Study on the Views of Practitioners and
Lawmakers [8.82540441326446]
Transparency, accountability, and privacy are the most critical AI ethics principles.
Lack of ethical knowledge, no legal frameworks, and lacking monitoring bodies are the most common AI ethics challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T17:24:29Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - Ethics of AI: A Systematic Literature Review of Principles and
Challenges [3.7129018407842445]
Transparency, privacy, accountability and fairness are identified as the most common AI ethics principles.
Lack of ethical knowledge and vague principles are reported as the significant challenges for considering ethics in AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-12T15:33:43Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - The Short Anthropological Guide to the Study of Ethical AI [91.3755431537592]
Short guide serves as both an introduction to AI ethics and social science and anthropological perspectives on the development of AI.
Aims to provide those unfamiliar with the field with an insight into the societal impact of AI systems and how, in turn, these systems can lead us to rethink how our world operates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-07T12:25:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.