Learning to Ask: When LLMs Meet Unclear Instruction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.00557v2
• Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 20:34:27 GMT
• Title: Learning to Ask: When LLMs Meet Unclear Instruction
• Authors: Wenxuan Wang, Juluan Shi, Chaozheng Wang, Cheryl Lee, Youliang Yuan, Jen-tse Huang, Michael R. Lyu,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) can leverage external tools for addressing a range of tasks unattainable through language skills alone. We evaluate the performance of LLMs tool-use under imperfect instructions, analyze the error patterns, and build a challenging tool-use benchmark called Noisy ToolBench. We propose a novel framework, Ask-when-Needed (AwN), which prompts LLMs to ask questions to users whenever they encounter obstacles due to unclear instructions.
• Score: 49.256630152684764
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Equipped with the capability to call functions, modern large language models (LLMs) can leverage external tools for addressing a range of tasks unattainable through language skills alone. However, the effective execution of these tools relies heavily not just on the advanced capabilities of LLMs but also on precise user instructions, which often cannot be ensured in the real world. To evaluate the performance of LLMs tool-use under imperfect instructions, we meticulously examine the real-world instructions queried from users, analyze the error patterns, and build a challenging tool-use benchmark called Noisy ToolBench (NoisyToolBench). We find that due to the next-token prediction training objective, LLMs tend to arbitrarily generate the missed argument, which may lead to hallucinations and risks. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework, Ask-when-Needed (AwN), which prompts LLMs to ask questions to users whenever they encounter obstacles due to unclear instructions. Moreover, to reduce the manual labor involved in user-LLM interaction and assess LLMs performance in tool utilization from both accuracy and efficiency perspectives, we design an automated evaluation tool named ToolEvaluator. Our experiments demonstrate that the AwN significantly outperforms existing frameworks for tool learning in the NoisyToolBench. We will release all related code and datasets to support future research.

Related papers

• Can Tool-augmented Large Language Models be Aware of Incomplete Conditions? [33.74511128798095]
  This study examines whether large language models can identify incomplete conditions and appropriately determine when to refrain from using tools. We confirm that most LLMs are challenged to identify the additional information required to utilize specific tools and the absence of appropriate tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T06:28:06Z)
• Chain of Tools: Large Language Model is an Automatic Multi-tool Learner [54.992464510992605]
  Automatic Tool Chain (ATC) is a framework that enables the large language models (LLMs) to act as a multi-tool user. To scale up the scope of the tools, we next propose a black-box probing method. For a comprehensive evaluation, we build a challenging benchmark named ToolFlow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T11:40:58Z)
• Let Me Do It For You: Towards LLM Empowered Recommendation via Tool Learning [57.523454568002144]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown capabilities in commonsense reasoning and leveraging external tools. We introduce ToolRec, a framework for LLM-empowered recommendations via tool learning. We formulate the recommendation process as a process aimed at exploring user interests in attribute granularity. We consider two types of attribute-oriented tools: rank tools and retrieval tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T00:06:54Z)
• Towards Practical Tool Usage for Continually Learning LLMs [28.62382804829694]
  Large language models show an innate skill for solving language based tasks. But their knowledge, stored directly within their parameters, remains static in time. Tool use helps by offloading work to systems that the LLM can access through an interface. But LLMs that use them still must adapt to nonstationary environments for prolonged use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-14T19:45:47Z)
• LLMs in the Imaginarium: Tool Learning through Simulated Trial and Error [54.954211216847135]
  Existing large language models (LLMs) only reach a correctness rate in the range of 30% to 60%. We propose a biologically inspired method for tool-augmented LLMs, simulated trial and error (STE) STE orchestrates three key mechanisms for successful tool use behaviors in the biological system: trial and error, imagination, and memory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T18:50:51Z)
• Look Before You Leap: Towards Decision-Aware and Generalizable Tool-Usage for Large Language Models [26.28459880766842]
  We propose a decision-aware and generalizable tool-usage framework (DEER) Specifically, we first construct the tool-usage samples with multiple decision branches via an automatic generation pipeline. Our proposed DEER is effective and significantly outperforms baselines across various datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T16:11:03Z)
• Efficient Tool Use with Chain-of-Abstraction Reasoning [65.18096363216574]
  Large language models (LLMs) need to ground their reasoning to real-world knowledge. There remains challenges for fine-tuning LLM agents to invoke tools in multi-step reasoning problems. We propose a new method for LLMs to better leverage tools in multi-step reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T21:53:30Z)
• Planning, Creation, Usage: Benchmarking LLMs for Comprehensive Tool Utilization in Real-World Complex Scenarios [93.68764280953624]
  UltraTool is a novel benchmark designed to improve and evaluate Large Language Models' ability in tool utilization. It emphasizes real-world complexities, demanding accurate, multi-step planning for effective problem-solving. A key feature of UltraTool is its independent evaluation of planning with natural language, which happens before tool usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T16:52:56Z)
• ToolQA: A Dataset for LLM Question Answering with External Tools [14.408707186450899]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in various NLP tasks. They still suffer from challenges such as hallucination and weak numerical reasoning. To overcome these challenges, external tools can be used to enhance LLMs' question-answering abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T05:43:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.