VA3: Virtually Assured Amplification Attack on Probabilistic Copyright Protection for Text-to-Image Generative Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00057v2
• Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 14:28:26 GMT
• Title: VA3: Virtually Assured Amplification Attack on Probabilistic Copyright Protection for Text-to-Image Generative Models
• Authors: Xiang Li, Qianli Shen, Kenji Kawaguchi,
• Abstract summary: We introduce Virtually Assured Amplification Attack (VA3), a novel online attack framework. VA3 amplifies the probability of generating infringing content on the sustained interactions with generative models. These findings highlight the potential risk of implementing probabilistic copyright protection in practical applications of text-to-image generative models.
• Score: 27.77911368516792
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The booming use of text-to-image generative models has raised concerns about their high risk of producing copyright-infringing content. While probabilistic copyright protection methods provide a probabilistic guarantee against such infringement, in this paper, we introduce Virtually Assured Amplification Attack (VA3), a novel online attack framework that exposes the vulnerabilities of these protection mechanisms. The proposed framework significantly amplifies the probability of generating infringing content on the sustained interactions with generative models and a non-trivial lower-bound on the success probability of each engagement. Our theoretical and experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach under various scenarios. These findings highlight the potential risk of implementing probabilistic copyright protection in practical applications of text-to-image generative models. Code is available at https://github.com/South7X/VA3.

Related papers

• Probabilistic Analysis of Copyright Disputes and Generative AI Safety [0.0]
  The paper provides a structured analysis of key evidentiary principles, with particular emphasis on the "inverse ratio rule" The paper examines the heightened copyright risks posed by generative AI, highlighting how extensive access to copyrighted material by generative models increases the risk of infringement. The analysis reveals that while the Near Access-Free (NAF) condition mitigates some infringement risks, its justifiability and efficacy are questionable in certain contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T08:05:19Z)
• Strong Copyright Protection for Language Models via Adaptive Model Fusion [15.48692649098646]
  Copyright-Protecting Fusion (CP-Fuse) is an algorithm that adaptively combines language models to minimize the reproduction of protected materials. Our results show that CP-Fuse significantly reduces the memorization of copyrighted content while maintaining high-quality text and code generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T15:32:30Z)
• Evaluating Copyright Takedown Methods for Language Models [100.38129820325497]
  Language models (LMs) derive their capabilities from extensive training on diverse data, including potentially copyrighted material. This paper introduces the first evaluation of the feasibility and side effects of copyright takedowns for LMs. We examine several strategies, including adding system prompts, decoding-time filtering interventions, and unlearning approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T18:09:46Z)
• MirrorCheck: Efficient Adversarial Defense for Vision-Language Models [55.73581212134293]
  We propose a novel, yet elegantly simple approach for detecting adversarial samples in Vision-Language Models. Our method leverages Text-to-Image (T2I) models to generate images based on captions produced by target VLMs. Empirical evaluations conducted on different datasets validate the efficacy of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T15:55:04Z)
• Concept Arithmetics for Circumventing Concept Inhibition in Diffusion Models [58.065255696601604]
  We use compositional property of diffusion models, which allows to leverage multiple prompts in a single image generation. We argue that it is essential to consider all possible approaches to image generation with diffusion models that can be employed by an adversary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-21T16:35:16Z)
• CPR: Retrieval Augmented Generation for Copyright Protection [101.15323302062562]
  We introduce CopyProtected generation with Retrieval (CPR), a new method for RAG with strong copyright protection guarantees. CPR allows to condition the output of diffusion models on a set of retrieved images. We prove that CPR satisfies Near Access Freeness (NAF) which bounds the amount of information an attacker may be able to extract from the generated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T18:09:55Z)
• Foundation Models and Fair Use [96.04664748698103]
  In the U.S. and other countries, copyrighted content may be used to build foundation models without incurring liability due to the fair use doctrine. In this work, we survey the potential risks of developing and deploying foundation models based on copyrighted content. We discuss technical mitigations that can help foundation models stay in line with fair use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:58:40Z)
• Copyright Protection and Accountability of Generative AI:Attack, Watermarking and Attribution [7.0159295162418385]
  We propose an evaluation framework to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of the copyright protection measures for GANs. Our findings indicate that the current intellectual property protection methods for input images, model watermarking, and attribution networks are largely satisfactory for a wide range of GANs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T06:40:57Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.