Detecting algorithmic bias in medical-AI models using trees

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02959v7
• Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:31:01 GMT
• Title: Detecting algorithmic bias in medical-AI models using trees
• Authors: Jeffrey Smith, Andre Holder, Rishikesan Kamaleswaran, Yao Xie,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents an innovative framework for detecting areas of algorithmic bias in medical-AI decision support systems. Our approach efficiently identifies potential biases in medical-AI models, specifically in the context of sepsis prediction.
• Score: 7.939586935057782
• License:
• Abstract: With the growing prevalence of machine learning and artificial intelligence-based medical decision support systems, it is equally important to ensure that these systems provide patient outcomes in a fair and equitable fashion. This paper presents an innovative framework for detecting areas of algorithmic bias in medical-AI decision support systems. Our approach efficiently identifies potential biases in medical-AI models, specifically in the context of sepsis prediction, by employing the Classification and Regression Trees (CART) algorithm with conformity scores. We verify our methodology by conducting a series of synthetic data experiments, showcasing its ability to estimate areas of bias in controlled settings precisely. The effectiveness of the concept is further validated by experiments using electronic medical records from Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, Georgia. These tests demonstrate the practical implementation of our strategy in a clinical environment, where it can function as a vital instrument for guaranteeing fairness and equity in AI-based medical decisions.

Related papers

• An Explainable AI Framework for Artificial Intelligence of Medical Things [2.7774194651211217]
  We leverage a custom XAI framework, incorporating techniques such as Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME), SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-Cam) The proposed framework enhances the effectiveness of strategic healthcare methods and aims to instill trust and promote understanding in AI-driven medical applications. We apply the XAI framework to brain tumor detection as a use case demonstrating accurate and transparent diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T01:08:41Z)
• A survey of recent methods for addressing AI fairness and bias in biomedicine [48.46929081146017]
  Artificial intelligence systems may perpetuate social inequities or demonstrate biases, such as those based on race or gender. We surveyed recent publications on different debiasing methods in the fields of biomedical natural language processing (NLP) or computer vision (CV) We performed a literature search on PubMed, ACM digital library, and IEEE Xplore of relevant articles published between January 2018 and December 2023 using multiple combinations of keywords. We reviewed other potential methods from the general domain that could be applied to biomedicine to address bias and improve fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T06:38:46Z)
• SUDO: a framework for evaluating clinical artificial intelligence systems without ground-truth annotations [3.7525007896336944]
  We introduce SUDO, a framework for evaluating AI systems without ground-truth annotations. We show that SUDO can be a reliable proxy for model performance and thus identify unreliable predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T18:12:03Z)
• Unmasking Bias in AI: A Systematic Review of Bias Detection and Mitigation Strategies in Electronic Health Record-based Models [6.300835344100545]
  Leveraging artificial intelligence in conjunction with electronic health records holds transformative potential to improve healthcare. Yet, addressing bias in AI, which risks worsening healthcare disparities, cannot be overlooked. This study reviews methods to detect and mitigate diverse forms of bias in AI models developed using EHR data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T18:29:15Z)
• TREEMENT: Interpretable Patient-Trial Matching via Personalized Dynamic Tree-Based Memory Network [54.332862955411656]
  Clinical trials are critical for drug development but often suffer from expensive and inefficient patient recruitment. In recent years, machine learning models have been proposed for speeding up patient recruitment via automatically matching patients with clinical trials. We introduce a dynamic tree-based memory network model named TREEMENT to provide accurate and interpretable patient trial matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T12:35:09Z)
• Estimating Test Performance for AI Medical Devices under Distribution Shift with Conformal Prediction [4.395519864600419]
  We consider the task of predicting the test accuracy of an arbitrary black-box model on an unlabeled target domain. We propose a "black-box" test estimation technique based on conformal prediction and evaluate it against other methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-12T19:25:21Z)
• The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment: Medical Decision Modelling through Simulation [81.72197368690031]
  We present a new benchmarking suite designed specifically for medical sequential decision making. The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment is a publicly available Python package providing simple and easy access to high-fidelity synthetic medical data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T10:38:09Z)
• Estimating and Improving Fairness with Adversarial Learning [65.99330614802388]
  We propose an adversarial multi-task training strategy to simultaneously mitigate and detect bias in the deep learning-based medical image analysis system. Specifically, we propose to add a discrimination module against bias and a critical module that predicts unfairness within the base classification model. We evaluate our framework on a large-scale public-available skin lesion dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-07T03:10:32Z)
• Detecting Spurious Correlations with Sanity Tests for Artificial Intelligence Guided Radiology Systems [22.249702822013045]
  A critical component to deploying AI in radiology is to gain confidence in a developed system's efficacy and safety. The current gold standard approach is to conduct an analytical validation of performance on a generalization dataset. We describe a series of sanity tests to identify when a system performs well on development data for the wrong reasons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-04T14:14:05Z)
• Privacy-preserving medical image analysis [53.4844489668116]
  We present PriMIA, a software framework designed for privacy-preserving machine learning (PPML) in medical imaging. We show significantly better classification performance of a securely aggregated federated learning model compared to human experts on unseen datasets. We empirically evaluate the framework's security against a gradient-based model inversion attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T13:56:00Z)
• Learning Binary Semantic Embedding for Histology Image Classification and Retrieval [56.34863511025423]
  We propose a novel method for Learning Binary Semantic Embedding (LBSE) Based on the efficient and effective embedding, classification and retrieval are performed to provide interpretable computer-assisted diagnosis for histology images. Experiments conducted on three benchmark datasets validate the superiority of LBSE under various scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T08:36:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.