Uncertainty quantification in automated valuation models with spatially weighted conformal prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06531v2
• Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 13:49:20 GMT
• Title: Uncertainty quantification in automated valuation models with spatially weighted conformal prediction
• Authors: Anders Hjort, Gudmund Horn Hermansen, Johan Pensar, Jonathan P. Williams,
• Abstract summary: Conformal prediction (CP) is a framework for constructing confidence sets around predictions of machine learning models with minimal assumptions.<n>Due to the spatial dependencies observed in house prices, direct application of CP leads to confidence sets that are not calibrated everywhere.<n>We show that calibrating the confidence sets on a spatially weighted version of the non-conformity scores makes the coverage more consistently calibrated across geographical regions.
• Score: 1.0687104237121408
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Non-parametric machine learning models, such as random forests and gradient boosted trees, are frequently used to estimate house prices due to their predictive accuracy, but a main drawback of such methods is their limited ability to quantify prediction uncertainty. Conformal prediction (CP) is a model-agnostic framework for constructing confidence sets around predictions of machine learning models with minimal assumptions. However, due to the spatial dependencies observed in house prices, direct application of CP leads to confidence sets that are not calibrated everywhere, i.e., the confidence sets will be too large in certain geographical regions and too small in others. We survey various approaches to adjust the CP confidence set to account for this and demonstrate their performance on a data set from the housing market in Oslo, Norway. Our findings indicate that calibrating the confidence sets on a spatially weighted version of the non-conformity scores makes the coverage more consistently calibrated across geographical regions. We also perform a simulation study on synthetically generated sale prices to empirically explore the performance of CP on housing market data under idealized conditions with known data-generating mechanisms.

Related papers

• Trust, or Don't Predict: Introducing the CWSA Family for Confidence-Aware Model Evaluation [0.0]
  We introduce two new metrics Confidence-Weighted Selective Accuracy (CWSA) and its normalized variant CWSA+.<n>CWSA offers principled and interpretable way to evaluate predictive models under confidence thresholds.<n>We show that CWSA and CWSA+ both effectively detect nuanced failure modes and outperform classical metrics in trust-sensitive tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T10:07:48Z)
• Confidence Aware Learning for Reliable Face Anti-spoofing [52.23271636362843]
  We propose a Confidence Aware Face Anti-spoofing model, which is aware of its capability boundary. We estimate its confidence during the prediction of each sample. Experiments show that the proposed CA-FAS can effectively recognize samples with low prediction confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T14:29:02Z)
• Probabilistic Scores of Classifiers, Calibration is not Enough [0.32985979395737786]
  In binary classification tasks, accurate representation of probabilistic predictions is essential for various real-world applications. In this study, we highlight approaches that prioritize the alignment between predicted scores and true probability distributions. Our findings reveal limitations in traditional calibration metrics, which could undermine the reliability of predictive models for critical decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T19:53:00Z)
• From Conformal Predictions to Confidence Regions [1.4272411349249627]
  We introduce CCR, which employs a combination of conformal prediction intervals for the model outputs to establish confidence regions for model parameters. We present coverage guarantees under minimal assumptions on noise and that is valid in finite sample regime. Our approach is applicable to both split conformal predictions and black-box methodologies including full or cross-conformal approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T21:33:12Z)
• Revisiting Confidence Estimation: Towards Reliable Failure Prediction [53.79160907725975]
  We find a general, widely existing but actually-neglected phenomenon that most confidence estimation methods are harmful for detecting misclassification errors. We propose to enlarge the confidence gap by finding flat minima, which yields state-of-the-art failure prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T11:44:14Z)
• Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked Spatio-Temporal Point Process with Uncertainty Quantification [59.81904428056924]
  We introduce SMASH: a Score MAtching estimator for learning markedPs with uncertainty quantification. Specifically, our framework adopts a normalization-free objective by estimating the pseudolikelihood of markedPs through score-matching. The superior performance of our proposed framework is demonstrated through extensive experiments in both event prediction and uncertainty quantification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T02:37:51Z)
• On the Temperature of Bayesian Graph Neural Networks for Conformal Prediction [3.4546761246181696]
  Conformal prediction (CP) offers a promising framework for quantifying uncertainty. CP ensures formal probabilistic guarantees that a prediction set contains a true label with a desired probability. We empirically demonstrate the existence of temperatures that result in more efficient prediction sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T10:24:25Z)
• Multiclass Alignment of Confidence and Certainty for Network Calibration [10.15706847741555]
  Recent studies reveal that deep neural networks (DNNs) are prone to making overconfident predictions. We propose a new train-time calibration method, which features a simple, plug-and-play auxiliary loss known as multi-class alignment of predictive mean confidence and predictive certainty (MACC) Our method achieves state-of-the-art calibration performance for both in-domain and out-domain predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T00:56:24Z)
• Proximity-Informed Calibration for Deep Neural Networks [49.330703634912915]
  ProCal is a plug-and-play algorithm with a theoretical guarantee to adjust sample confidence based on proximity. We show that ProCal is effective in addressing proximity bias and improving calibration on balanced, long-tail, and distribution-shift settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T16:40:51Z)
• Reliability-Aware Prediction via Uncertainty Learning for Person Image Retrieval [51.83967175585896]
  UAL aims at providing reliability-aware predictions by considering data uncertainty and model uncertainty simultaneously. Data uncertainty captures the noise" inherent in the sample, while model uncertainty depicts the model's confidence in the sample's prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T17:53:20Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
  In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z)
• MD-split+: Practical Local Conformal Inference in High Dimensions [0.5439020425819]
  MD-split+ is a practical local conformal approach that creates X partitions based on localized model performance. We discuss how our local partitions philosophically align with expected behavior from an unattainable conditional conformal inference approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T15:19:16Z)
• Private Prediction Sets [72.75711776601973]
  Machine learning systems need reliable uncertainty quantification and protection of individuals' privacy. We present a framework that treats these two desiderata jointly. We evaluate the method on large-scale computer vision datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T18:59:11Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.