Exploring Popularity Bias in Session-based Recommendation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07855v1
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:48:35 GMT
- Title: Exploring Popularity Bias in Session-based Recommendation
- Authors: Haowen Wang
- Abstract summary: We extend the analysis to session-based setup and adapted propensity calculation to the unique characteristics of session-based recommendation tasks.
We study the distributions of propensity and different stratification techniques on different datasets and find that propensity-related traits are actually dataset-specific.
- Score: 0.6798775532273751
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Existing work has revealed that large-scale offline evaluation of recommender
systems for user-item interactions is prone to bias caused by the deployed
system itself, as a form of closed loop feedback. Many adopt the
\textit{propensity} concept to analyze or mitigate this empirical issue. In
this work, we extend the analysis to session-based setup and adapted propensity
calculation to the unique characteristics of session-based recommendation
tasks. Our experiments incorporate neural models and KNN-based models, and
cover both the music and the e-commerce domain. We study the distributions of
propensity and different stratification techniques on different datasets and
find that propensity-related traits are actually dataset-specific. We then
leverage the effect of stratification and achieve promising results compared to
the original models.
Related papers
- GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models [56.63218531256961]
We introduce GenBench, a benchmarking suite specifically tailored for evaluating the efficacy of Genomic Foundation Models.
GenBench offers a modular and expandable framework that encapsulates a variety of state-of-the-art methodologies.
We provide a nuanced analysis of the interplay between model architecture and dataset characteristics on task-specific performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-01T08:01:05Z) - A Bayesian Approach to Robust Inverse Reinforcement Learning [54.24816623644148]
We consider a Bayesian approach to offline model-based inverse reinforcement learning (IRL)
The proposed framework differs from existing offline model-based IRL approaches by performing simultaneous estimation of the expert's reward function and subjective model of environment dynamics.
Our analysis reveals a novel insight that the estimated policy exhibits robust performance when the expert is believed to have a highly accurate model of the environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-15T17:37:09Z) - Ensemble Modeling for Multimodal Visual Action Recognition [50.38638300332429]
We propose an ensemble modeling approach for multimodal action recognition.
We independently train individual modality models using a variant of focal loss tailored to handle the long-tailed distribution of the MECCANO [21] dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-10T08:43:20Z) - Bayesian Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction Models
using Tensor Regression for Multi-environmental Trials [0.0]
We propose a Bayesian tensor regression model to accommodate the effect of multiple factors on phenotype prediction.
We adopt a set of prior distributions that resolve identifiability issues that may arise between the parameters in the model.
We explore the applicability of our model by analysing real-world data related to wheat production across Ireland from 2010 to 2019.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-09T19:54:50Z) - Debiased Recommendation with Neural Stratification [19.841871819722016]
We propose to cluster the users for computing more accurate IPS via increasing the exposure densities.
We conduct extensive experiments based on real-world datasets to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-15T15:45:35Z) - Deep Causal Reasoning for Recommendations [47.83224399498504]
A new trend in recommender system research is to negate the influence of confounders from a causal perspective.
We model the recommendation as a multi-cause multi-outcome (MCMO) inference problem.
We show that MCMO modeling may lead to high variance due to scarce observations associated with the high-dimensional causal space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-06T15:00:01Z) - Deep Variational Models for Collaborative Filtering-based Recommender
Systems [63.995130144110156]
Deep learning provides accurate collaborative filtering models to improve recommender system results.
Our proposed models apply the variational concept to injectity in the latent space of the deep architecture.
Results show the superiority of the proposed approach in scenarios where the variational enrichment exceeds the injected noise effect.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-27T08:59:39Z) - CDEvalSumm: An Empirical Study of Cross-Dataset Evaluation for Neural
Summarization Systems [121.78477833009671]
We investigate the performance of different summarization models under a cross-dataset setting.
A comprehensive study of 11 representative summarization systems on 5 datasets from different domains reveals the effect of model architectures and generation ways.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-11T02:19:15Z) - Theoretical Modeling of the Iterative Properties of User Discovery in a
Collaborative Filtering Recommender System [0.0]
The closed feedback loop in recommender systems is a common setting that can lead to different types of biases.
We present a theoretical framework to model the evolution of the different components of a recommender system operating within a feedback loop setting.
Our findings lay the theoretical basis for quantifying the effect of feedback loops and for designing Artificial Intelligence and machine learning algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-21T20:30:39Z) - Causal Modeling with Stochastic Confounders [11.881081802491183]
This work extends causal inference with confounders.
We propose a new approach to variational estimation for causal inference based on a representer theorem with a random input space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-24T00:34:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.