Drivers and Barriers of AI Adoption and Use in Scientific Research
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.09843v2
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 18:30:31 GMT
- Title: Drivers and Barriers of AI Adoption and Use in Scientific Research
- Authors: Stefano Bianchini, Moritz M\"uller and Pierre Pelletier
- Abstract summary: We study the integration of AI in scientific research, focusing on the human capital of scientists and the external resources available within their network of collaborators and institutions.
Our results suggest that AI is pioneered by domain scientists with a taste for exploration' and who are embedded in a network rich of computer scientists, experienced AI scientists and early-career researchers.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: New technologies have the power to revolutionize science. It has happened in
the past and is happening again with the emergence of new computational tools,
such as artificial intelligence and machine learning. Despite the documented
impact of these technologies, there remains a significant gap in understanding
the process of their adoption within the scientific community. In this paper,
we draw on theories of scientific and technical human capital to study the
integration of AI in scientific research, focusing on the human capital of
scientists and the external resources available within their network of
collaborators and institutions. We validate our hypotheses on a large sample of
publications from OpenAlex, covering all sciences from 1980 to 2020, and
identify a set key drivers and inhibitors of AI adoption and use in science.
Our results suggest that AI is pioneered by domain scientists with a `taste for
exploration' and who are embedded in a network rich of computer scientists,
experienced AI scientists and early-career researchers; they come from
institutions with high citation impact and a relatively strong publication
history on AI. The access to computing resources only matters for a few
scientific disciplines, such as chemistry and medical sciences. Once AI is
integrated into research, most adoption factors continue to influence its
subsequent reuse. Implications for the organization and management of science
in the evolving era of AI-driven discovery are discussed.
Related papers
- Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.
Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z) - Towards Scientific Discovery with Generative AI: Progress, Opportunities, and Challenges [11.232704182001253]
This paper examines the current state of AI for scientific discovery, highlighting recent progress in large language models and other AI techniques applied to scientific tasks.
We then outline key challenges and promising research directions toward developing more comprehensive AI systems for scientific discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-16T03:52:20Z) - AI Expands Scientists' Impact but Contracts Science's Focus [11.634306888037273]
We analyze 67.9 million research papers across six major fields using a validated language model.
Scientists who adopt AI tools publish 67.37% more papers, receive 3.16 times more citations, and become team leaders 4 years earlier than non-adopters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-10T18:24:17Z) - Bridging AI and Science: Implications from a Large-Scale Literature Analysis of AI4Science [25.683422870223076]
We present a large-scale analysis of the AI4Science literature.
We quantitatively highlight key disparities between AI methods and scientific problems.
We explore the potential and challenges of facilitating collaboration between AI and scientific communities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-27T00:40:51Z) - On the Opportunities of Green Computing: A Survey [80.21955522431168]
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has achieved significant advancements in technology and research with the development over several decades.
The needs for high computing power brings higher carbon emission and undermines research fairness.
To tackle the challenges of computing resources and environmental impact of AI, Green Computing has become a hot research topic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-01T11:16:41Z) - DeepSpeed4Science Initiative: Enabling Large-Scale Scientific Discovery
through Sophisticated AI System Technologies [116.09762105379241]
DeepSpeed4Science aims to build unique capabilities through AI system technology innovations.
We showcase the early progress we made with DeepSpeed4Science in addressing two of the critical system challenges in structural biology research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-06T22:05:15Z) - AI empowering research: 10 ways how science can benefit from AI [0.0]
This article explores the transformative impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on scientific research.
It highlights ten ways in which AI is revolutionizing the work of scientists, including powerful referencing tools, improved understanding of research problems, enhanced research question generation, optimized research design, stub data generation, data transformation, advanced data analysis, and AI-assisted reporting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-17T18:41:18Z) - The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop
Artificial Intelligence [67.70415658080121]
Recent advances in machine learning and AI are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole.
AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access.
Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-09T21:16:56Z) - Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural
sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A
bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021 [73.06361680847708]
In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI, but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times.
In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI (many in computer science), but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times.
We conclude that the context of the current surge appears different, and that interdisciplinary AI application is likely to be sustained.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-15T14:08:07Z) - Quantifying the Benefit of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research [2.4700789675440524]
We estimate both the direct use of AI and the potential benefit of AI in scientific research.
We find that the use of AI in research is widespread throughout the sciences, growing especially rapidly since 2015.
Our analysis reveals considerable potential for AI to benefit numerous scientific fields, yet a notable disconnect exists between AI education and its research applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-17T08:08:50Z) - Learning from learning machines: a new generation of AI technology to
meet the needs of science [59.261050918992325]
We outline emerging opportunities and challenges to enhance the utility of AI for scientific discovery.
The distinct goals of AI for industry versus the goals of AI for science create tension between identifying patterns in data versus discovering patterns in the world from data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-27T00:55:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.