Human AI Collaboration in Software Engineering: Lessons Learned from a Hands On Workshop

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10620v1
• Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2023 06:31:05 GMT
• Title: Human AI Collaboration in Software Engineering: Lessons Learned from a Hands On Workshop
• Authors: Muhammad Hamza, Dominik Siemon, Muhammad Azeem Akbar, Tahsinur Rahman
• Abstract summary: The study identifies key themes such as the evolving nature of human AI interaction, the capabilities of AI in software engineering tasks, and the challenges and limitations of integrating AI in this domain. The findings show that while AI, particularly ChatGPT, improves the efficiency of code generation and optimization, human oversight remains crucial, especially in areas requiring complex problem solving and security considerations.
• Score: 1.14603174659129
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper investigates the dynamics of human AI collaboration in software engineering, focusing on the use of ChatGPT. Through a thematic analysis of a hands on workshop in which 22 professional software engineers collaborated for three hours with ChatGPT, we explore the transition of AI from a mere tool to a collaborative partner. The study identifies key themes such as the evolving nature of human AI interaction, the capabilities of AI in software engineering tasks, and the challenges and limitations of integrating AI in this domain. The findings show that while AI, particularly ChatGPT, improves the efficiency of code generation and optimization, human oversight remains crucial, especially in areas requiring complex problem solving and security considerations. This research contributes to the theoretical understanding of human AI collaboration in software engineering and provides practical insights for effectively integrating AI tools into development processes. It highlights the need for clear role allocation, effective communication, and balanced AI human collaboration to realize the full potential of AI in software engineering.

Related papers

• The Model Mastery Lifecycle: A Framework for Designing Human-AI Interaction [0.0]
  The utilization of AI in an increasing number of fields is the latest iteration of a long process. There is an urgent need for methods to determine how AI should be used in different situations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T01:00:32Z)
• Problem Solving Through Human-AI Preference-Based Cooperation [74.39233146428492]
  We propose HAI-Co2, a novel human-AI co-construction framework. We formalize HAI-Co2 and discuss the difficult open research problems that it faces. We present a case study of HAI-Co2 and demonstrate its efficacy compared to monolithic generative AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T11:06:57Z)
• Rethinking Software Engineering in the Foundation Model Era: From Task-Driven AI Copilots to Goal-Driven AI Pair Programmers [30.996760992473064]
  We propose a paradigm shift towards goal-driven AI-powered pair programmers that collaborate with human developers. We envision AI pair programmers that are goal-driven, human partners, SE-aware, and self-learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T02:10:20Z)
• Untangling Critical Interaction with AI in Students Written Assessment [2.8078480738404]
  Key challenge exists in ensuring that humans are equipped with the required critical thinking and AI literacy skills. This paper provides a first step toward conceptualizing the notion of critical learner interaction with AI. Using both theoretical models and empirical data, our preliminary findings suggest a general lack of Deep interaction with AI during the writing process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T12:12:50Z)
• The Rise of the AI Co-Pilot: Lessons for Design from Aviation and Beyond [22.33734581699234]
  We advocate for a paradigm where AI is seen as a collaborative co-pilot, working under human guidance rather than as a mere tool. Our paper proposes a design approach that emphasizes active human engagement, control, and skill enhancement in the AI partnership.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T13:58:15Z)
• Comparing Software Developers with ChatGPT: An Empirical Investigation [0.0]
  This paper conducts an empirical investigation, contrasting the performance of software engineers and AI systems, like ChatGPT, across different evaluation metrics. The paper posits that a comprehensive comparison of software engineers and AI-based solutions, considering various evaluation criteria, is pivotal in fostering human-machine collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T17:25:54Z)
• Enabling Automated Machine Learning for Model-Driven AI Engineering [60.09869520679979]
  We propose a novel approach to enable Model-Driven Software Engineering and Model-Driven AI Engineering. In particular, we support Automated ML, thus assisting software engineers without deep AI knowledge in developing AI-intensive systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-06T10:12:56Z)
• Human-Centered AI for Data Science: A Systematic Approach [48.71756559152512]
  Human-Centered AI (HCAI) refers to the research effort that aims to design and implement AI techniques to support various human tasks. We illustrate how we approach HCAI using a series of research projects around Data Science (DS) works as a case study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-03T21:47:13Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Watch-And-Help: A Challenge for Social Perception and Human-AI Collaboration [116.28433607265573]
  We introduce Watch-And-Help (WAH), a challenge for testing social intelligence in AI agents. In WAH, an AI agent needs to help a human-like agent perform a complex household task efficiently. We build VirtualHome-Social, a multi-agent household environment, and provide a benchmark including both planning and learning based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T21:48:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.