Extending Behavioral Software Engineering: Decision-Making and Collaboration in Human-AI Teams for Responsible Software Engineering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09496v1
• Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 09:40:25 GMT
• Title: Extending Behavioral Software Engineering: Decision-Making and Collaboration in Human-AI Teams for Responsible Software Engineering
• Authors: Lekshmi Murali Rani,
• Abstract summary: The study focuses on decision-making (DM) for software engineering (SE) tasks and collaboration within human-AI teams.<n>The goal of the research is to identify the challenges and nuances in HAIC from a cognitive perspective.<n>The research addresses HAIC and its impact on individual, team, and organizational level aspects of BSE.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The study of behavioral and social dimensions of software engineering (SE) tasks characterizes behavioral software engineering (BSE);however, the increasing significance of human-AI collaboration (HAIC) brings new directions in BSE by presenting new challenges and opportunities.This PhD research focuses on decision-making (DM) for SE tasks and collaboration within human-AI teams, aiming to promote responsible software engineering through a cognitive partnership between humans and AI.The goal of the research is to identify the challenges and nuances in HAIC from a cognitive perspective, design and optimize collaboration/partnership (human-AI team) that enhance collective intelligence and promote better, responsible DM in SE through human-centered approaches. The research addresses HAIC and its impact on individual, team, and organizational level aspects of BSE.

Related papers

• Unraveling Human-AI Teaming: A Review and Outlook [2.3396455015352258]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) is advancing at an unprecedented pace, with clear potential to enhance decision-making and productivity.<n>Yet, the collaborative decision-making process between humans and AI remains underdeveloped, often falling short of its transformative possibilities.<n>This paper explores the evolution of AI agents from passive tools to active collaborators in human-AI teams, emphasizing their ability to learn, adapt, and operate autonomously in complex environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T07:37:25Z)
• Constrained Human-AI Cooperation: An Inclusive Embodied Social Intelligence Challenge [47.74313897705183]
  CHAIC is an inclusive embodied social intelligence challenge designed to test social perception and cooperation in embodied agents. In CHAIC, the goal is for an embodied agent equipped with egocentric observations to assist a human who may be operating under physical constraints. We benchmark planning- and learning-based baselines on the challenge and introduce a new method that leverages large language models and behavior modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T04:41:12Z)
• AI-Driven Human-Autonomy Teaming in Tactical Operations: Proposed Framework, Challenges, and Future Directions [10.16399860867284]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques are transforming tactical operations by augmenting human decision-making capabilities. This paper explores AI-driven Human-Autonomy Teaming (HAT) as a transformative approach. We propose a comprehensive framework that addresses the key components of AI-driven HAT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T15:05:16Z)
• How Performance Pressure Influences AI-Assisted Decision Making [57.53469908423318]
  We show how pressure and explainable AI (XAI) techniques interact with AI advice-taking behavior.<n>Our results show complex interaction effects, with different combinations of pressure and XAI techniques either improving or worsening AI advice taking behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T22:39:52Z)
• Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Task [56.92961847155029]
  Theory of Mind (ToM) significantly impacts human collaboration and communication as a crucial capability to understand others. Mutual Theory of Mind (MToM) arises when AI agents with ToM capability collaborate with humans. We find that the agent's ToM capability does not significantly impact team performance but enhances human understanding of the agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T13:19:48Z)
• CREW: Facilitating Human-AI Teaming Research [3.7324091969140776]
  We introduce CREW, a platform to facilitate Human-AI teaming research in real-time decision-making scenarios.<n>It includes pre-built tasks for cognitive studies and Human-AI teaming with expandable potentials from our modular design.<n> CREW benchmarks real-time human-guided reinforcement learning agents using state-of-the-art algorithms and well-tuned baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T21:43:55Z)
• Human Delegation Behavior in Human-AI Collaboration: The Effect of Contextual Information [7.475784495279183]
  One promising approach to leverage existing complementary capabilities is allowing humans to delegate individual instances of decision tasks to AI. We conduct a behavioral study to explore the effects of providing contextual information to support this delegation decision. Our findings reveal that access to contextual information significantly improves human-AI team performance in delegation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T18:59:47Z)
• Human AI Collaboration in Software Engineering: Lessons Learned from a Hands On Workshop [1.14603174659129]
  The study identifies key themes such as the evolving nature of human AI interaction, the capabilities of AI in software engineering tasks, and the challenges and limitations of integrating AI in this domain. The findings show that while AI, particularly ChatGPT, improves the efficiency of code generation and optimization, human oversight remains crucial, especially in areas requiring complex problem solving and security considerations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-17T06:31:05Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Talent Analytics [46.025337523478825]
  Talent analytics has emerged as a promising field in applied data science for human resource management. Recent development of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence techniques have revolutionized human resource management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-03T07:53:20Z)
• Human-Centered AI for Data Science: A Systematic Approach [48.71756559152512]
  Human-Centered AI (HCAI) refers to the research effort that aims to design and implement AI techniques to support various human tasks. We illustrate how we approach HCAI using a series of research projects around Data Science (DS) works as a case study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-03T21:47:13Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper [50.25428141435537]
  Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) is an emerging interdisciplinary field arising in the intersection between machine learning, big data, streaming analytics, and the management of IT operations. Main aim of the AIOPS workshop is to bring together researchers from both academia and industry to present their experiences, results, and work in progress in this field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T10:43:10Z)
• Watch-And-Help: A Challenge for Social Perception and Human-AI Collaboration [116.28433607265573]
  We introduce Watch-And-Help (WAH), a challenge for testing social intelligence in AI agents. In WAH, an AI agent needs to help a human-like agent perform a complex household task efficiently. We build VirtualHome-Social, a multi-agent household environment, and provide a benchmark including both planning and learning based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T21:48:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.