Students' and Professionals' Perceived Creativity In Software Engineering: A Comparative Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.12014v1
• Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 10:06:27 GMT
• Title: Students' and Professionals' Perceived Creativity In Software Engineering: A Comparative Study
• Authors: Wouter Groeneveld, Laurens Luyten, Joost Vennekens, Kris Aerts
• Abstract summary: We interviewed 33 professionals via four focus groups and 10 SE students. Our results reveal 45 underlying topics related to creativity. As our aim is to install and further encourage creative problem solving in higher education, we have included a list of implications for educational practice.
• Score: 5.1451461018028715
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Creativity is a critical skill that professional software engineers leverage to tackle difficult problems. In higher education, multiple efforts have been made to spark creative skills of engineering students. However, creativity is a vague concept that is open to interpretation. Furthermore, studies have shown that there is a gap in perception and implementation of creativity between industry and academia. To better understand the role of creativity in software engineering (SE), we interviewed 33 professionals via four focus groups and 10 SE students. Our results reveal 45 underlying topics related to creativity. When comparing the perception of students versus professionals, we discovered fundamental differences, grouped into five themes: the creative environment, application of techniques, creative collaboration, nature vs nurture, and the perceived value of creativity. As our aim is to use these findings to install and further encourage creative problem solving in higher education, we have included a list of implications for educational practice.

Related papers

• AI and the Decentering of Disciplinary Creativity [1.9459606412374646]
  Drawing on recent work in the philosophy of creativity, I distinguish between creative approaches and creative products.<n>I show that while computation can extend disciplinary creativity, certain approaches involving AI can serve to displace it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T18:05:41Z)
• CreativityPrism: A Holistic Benchmark for Large Language Model Creativity [64.18257552903151]
  Creativity is often seen as a hallmark of human intelligence.<n>There is still no holistic framework to evaluate their creativity across diverse scenarios.<n>We propose CreativityPrism, an evaluation analysis framework that decomposes creativity into three dimensions: quality, novelty, and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T00:22:10Z)
• Rethinking Creativity Evaluation: A Critical Analysis of Existing Creativity Evaluations [47.51585845370428]
  We examine creativity measures including the creativity index, perplexity, syntactic templates, and LLM-as-a-Judge.<n>Our analyses reveal that these metrics exhibit limited consistency, capturing different dimensions of creativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T15:11:48Z)
• Cooking Up Creativity: A Cognitively-Inspired Approach for Enhancing LLM Creativity through Structured Representations [53.950760059792614]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at countless tasks, yet struggle with creativity. We introduce a novel approach that couples LLMs with structured representations and cognitively inspired manipulations to generate more creative and diverse ideas. We demonstrate our approach in the culinary domain with DishCOVER, a model that generates creative recipes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T11:13:06Z)
• Probing and Inducing Combinational Creativity in Vision-Language Models [52.76981145923602]
  Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have sparked debate about whether their outputs reflect combinational creativity. We propose the Identification-Explanation-Implication (IEI) framework, which decomposes creative processes into three levels. To validate this framework, we curate CreativeMashup, a high-quality dataset of 666 artist-generated visual mashups annotated according to the IEI framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T17:38:18Z)
• Contrasting to spark creativity in software development teams [2.2674718030662713]
  Three decades of empirical research in high-performing software development teams provides evidence that creativity can be promoted by an effective, disciplined development culture. This paper describes 'contrasting' as a key driver for creativity; describes creativity moves, tactics used by high-performing teams to produce useful contrasts; and characterizes key development behaviours observed to support a 'culture' of creativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T02:53:18Z)
• How Do Hackathons Foster Creativity? Towards AI Collaborative Evaluation of Creativity at Scale [47.73894679677285]
  We conduct a computational analysis of 193,353 hackathon projects. We identify means for organizers to foster creativity in hackathons. We explore the use of large language models to augment the evaluation of creative outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T10:17:52Z)
• Leveraging Creativity as a Problem Solving Tool in Software Engineering [0.7614628596146602]
  We port results from creativity research in the field of cognitive psychology to the field of software engineering. We explore how to leverage creativity as a practical problem solving tool to wield for software developers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T15:35:33Z)
• A Causality-aware Paradigm for Evaluating Creativity of Multimodal Large Language Models [100.16387798660833]
  Oogiri game is a creativity-driven task requiring humor and associative thinking. LoTbench is an interactive, causality-aware evaluation framework. Results show that while most LLMs exhibit constrained creativity, the performance gap between LLMs and humans is not insurmountable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-25T09:11:15Z)
• Creativity in AI: Progresses and Challenges [17.03526787878041]
  We study the creative capabilities of AI systems, focusing on creative problem-solving, linguistic, artistic, and scientific creativity. Our review suggests that while the latest AI models are largely capable of producing linguistically and artistically creative outputs, they struggle with tasks that require creative problem-solving. We highlight the need for a comprehensive evaluation of creativity that is process-driven and considers several dimensions of creativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T17:43:39Z)
• Representational Alignment Supports Effective Machine Teaching [81.19197059407121]
  We integrate insights from machine teaching and pragmatic communication with the literature on representational alignment. We design a supervised learning environment that disentangles representational alignment from teacher accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T17:48:24Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
• Does Interdisciplinary Creative Coding Boost Creativity? A Mixed Methods Approach [1.7311053765541486]
  Literature deems such skills vital for software engineering (SE) students in higher education. 39 SE students and graphic design (GD) students were randomly paired to work on an open-ended creative coding assignment in p5.js. Results indicate that, while the creativity of the end product initially takes a hit, the SE+GD groups' socio-interactive creativity levels increased.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-03T07:33:35Z)
• Automatic Creativity Measurement in Scratch Programs Across Modalities [6.242018846706069]
  We make the journey fromdefining a formal measure of creativity that is efficientlycomputable to applying the measure in a practical domain. We adapted the general measure for projects in the popular visual programming language Scratch. We designed a machine learning model for predicting the creativity of Scratch projects, trained and evaluated on human expert creativity assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T10:43:36Z)
• Environmental and Social Sustainability of Creative-Ai [0.0]
  In our ongoing research, we investigate such Creative-Ai from sustainability and ethical perspectives. The two main focus areas are understanding the environmental sustainability aspects in the context of artistic processes that involve Creative-Ai. We will present our interdisciplinary approach, which combines interviews, workshops, online ethnography, and energy measurements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-26T17:47:19Z)
• Computational Storytelling and Emotions: A Survey [56.95572957863576]
  This survey paper is intended to summarize and contribute to the development of research being conducted on the relationship between stories and emotions. We believe creativity research is not to replace humans with computers, but to find a way of collaboration between humans and computers to enhance the creativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T00:21:59Z)
• Discovering Generalizable Skills via Automated Generation of Diverse Tasks [82.16392072211337]
  We propose a method to discover generalizable skills via automated generation of a diverse set of tasks. As opposed to prior work on unsupervised discovery of skills, our method pairs each skill with a unique task produced by a trainable task generator. A task discriminator defined on the robot behaviors in the generated tasks is jointly trained to estimate the evidence lower bound of the diversity objective. The learned skills can then be composed in a hierarchical reinforcement learning algorithm to solve unseen target tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-26T03:41:51Z)
• Creation and Evaluation of a Pre-tertiary Artificial Intelligence (AI) Curriculum [58.86139968005518]
  The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)-Jockey Club AI for the Future Project (AI4Future) co-created an AI curriculum for pre-tertiary education. A team of 14 professors with expertise in engineering and education collaborated with 17 principals and teachers from 6 secondary schools to co-create the curriculum. The co-creation process generated a variety of resources which enhanced the teachers knowledge in AI, as well as fostered teachers autonomy in bringing the subject matter into their classrooms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T11:26:19Z)
• Explaining Creative Artifacts [69.86890599471202]
  We develop an inverse problem formulation to deconstruct the products of and compositional creativity into associative chains. In particular, our formulation is structured as solving a traveling salesman problem through a knowledge graph of associative elements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T14:32:38Z)
• Guru, Partner, or Pencil Sharpener? Understanding Designers' Attitudes Towards Intelligent Creativity Support Tools [4.812445272764651]
  Creativity Support Tools (CST) aim to enhance human creativity, but the deeply personal and subjective nature of creativity makes the design of universal support tools challenging. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques could provide a means of creating 'intelligent' CST which learn and adapt to personal styles of creativity. This paper details the results of a survey of professional designers which indicates a positive and pragmatic attitude towards collaborating with AI tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-09T14:52:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.