Bayesian Causal Forests for Longitudinal Data: Assessing the Impact of Part-Time Work on Growth in High School Mathematics Achievement

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11927v1
• Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 17:18:33 GMT
• Title: Bayesian Causal Forests for Longitudinal Data: Assessing the Impact of Part-Time Work on Growth in High School Mathematics Achievement
• Authors: Nathan McJames, Ann O'Shea, Andrew Parnell,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a longitudinal extension of Bayesian Causal Forests. This model allows for the flexible identification of both individual growth in mathematical ability and the effects of participation in part-time work. Results reveal the negative impact of part time work for most students, but hint at potential benefits for those students with an initially low sense of school belonging.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Modelling growth in student achievement is a significant challenge in the field of education. Understanding how interventions or experiences such as part-time work can influence this growth is also important. Traditional methods like difference-in-differences are effective for estimating causal effects from longitudinal data. Meanwhile, Bayesian non-parametric methods have recently become popular for estimating causal effects from single time point observational studies. However, there remains a scarcity of methods capable of combining the strengths of these two approaches to flexibly estimate heterogeneous causal effects from longitudinal data. Motivated by two waves of data from the High School Longitudinal Study, the NCES' most recent longitudinal study which tracks a representative sample of over 20,000 students in the US, our study introduces a longitudinal extension of Bayesian Causal Forests. This model allows for the flexible identification of both individual growth in mathematical ability and the effects of participation in part-time work. Simulation studies demonstrate the predictive performance and reliable uncertainty quantification of the proposed model. Results reveal the negative impact of part time work for most students, but hint at potential benefits for those students with an initially low sense of school belonging. Clear signs of a widening achievement gap between students with high and low academic achievement are also identified. Potential policy implications are discussed, along with promising areas for future research.

Related papers

• On the Identification of Temporally Causal Representation with Instantaneous Dependence [50.14432597910128]
  Temporally causal representation learning aims to identify the latent causal process from time series observations. Most methods require the assumption that the latent causal processes do not have instantaneous relations. We propose an textbfIDentification framework for instantanetextbfOus textbfLatent dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T08:08:05Z)
• Machine Learning Predicts Upper Secondary Education Dropout as Early as the End of Primary School [0.0]
  This study expanded the modeling horizon by utilizing a 13-year longitudinal dataset, encompassing data from kindergarten to Grade 9. Our methodology incorporated a comprehensive range of parameters, including students' academic and cognitive skills, motivation, behavior, well-being, and officially recorded dropout data. The machine learning models developed in this study demonstrated notable classification ability, achieving a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.61 with data up to Grade 6 and an improved AUC of 0.65 with data up to Grade 9.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T13:18:08Z)
• Have Learning Analytics Dashboards Lived Up to the Hype? A Systematic Review of Impact on Students' Achievement, Motivation, Participation and Attitude [0.0]
  There is no evidence to support the conclusion that learning analytics dashboards (LADs) have lived up to the promise of improving academic achievement. LADs showed a relatively substantial impact on student participation. To advance the research line for LADs, researchers should use rigorous assessment methods and establish clear standards for evaluating learning constructs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T20:12:52Z)
• Small-scale proxies for large-scale Transformer training instabilities [69.36381318171338]
  We seek ways to reproduce and study training stability and instability at smaller scales. By measuring the relationship between learning rate and loss across scales, we show that these instabilities also appear in small models when training at high learning rates. We study methods such as warm-up, weight decay, and the $mu$Param to train small models that achieve similar losses across orders of magnitude of learning rate variation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T17:48:51Z)
• Sensitivity, Performance, Robustness: Deconstructing the Effect of Sociodemographic Prompting [64.80538055623842]
  sociodemographic prompting is a technique that steers the output of prompt-based models towards answers that humans with specific sociodemographic profiles would give. We show that sociodemographic information affects model predictions and can be beneficial for improving zero-shot learning in subjective NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T15:42:06Z)
• Students Success Modeling: Most Important Factors [0.47829670123819784]
  The model undertakes to identify students likely to graduate, the ones likely to transfer to a different school, and the ones likely to drop out and leave their higher education unfinished. Our experiments demonstrate that distinguishing between to-be-graduate and at-risk students is reasonably achievable in the earliest stages. The model remarkably foresees the fate of students who stay in the school for three years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T19:23:10Z)
• DOMINO: Visual Causal Reasoning with Time-Dependent Phenomena [59.291745595756346]
  We propose a set of visual analytics methods that allow humans to participate in the discovery of causal relations associated with windows of time delay. Specifically, we leverage a well-established method, logic-based causality, to enable analysts to test the significance of potential causes. Since an effect can be a cause of other effects, we allow users to aggregate different temporal cause-effect relations found with our method into a visual flow diagram.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-12T03:40:21Z)
• Active Bayesian Causal Inference [72.70593653185078]
  We propose Active Bayesian Causal Inference (ABCI), a fully-Bayesian active learning framework for integrated causal discovery and reasoning. ABCI jointly infers a posterior over causal models and queries of interest. We show that our approach is more data-efficient than several baselines that only focus on learning the full causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T22:38:57Z)
• Measuring Domain Knowledge for Early Prediction of Student Performance: A Semantic Approach [5.721241882795979]
  The researchers have used various predictors in performance modelling studies. Association mining on nearly 0.35 million observations establishes that prior cognition impacts the student performance. The proposed approach of measuring domain knowledge can help the early performance modelling studies to use it as a predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-15T23:46:27Z)
• Long-Term Effect Estimation with Surrogate Representation [43.932546958874696]
  This work studies the problem of long-term effect where the outcome of primary interest, or primary outcome, takes months or even years to accumulate. We propose to build connections between long-term causal inference and sequential models in machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-19T03:16:18Z)
• Predicting MOOCs Dropout Using Only Two Easily Obtainable Features from the First Week's Activities [56.1344233010643]
  Several features are considered to contribute towards learner attrition or lack of interest, which may lead to disengagement or total dropout. This study aims to predict dropout early-on, from the first week, by comparing several machine-learning approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-12T10:44:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.