A Computational Framework for Behavioral Assessment of LLM Therapists

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00820v2
• Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 22:01:57 GMT
• Title: A Computational Framework for Behavioral Assessment of LLM Therapists
• Authors: Yu Ying Chiu, Ashish Sharma, Inna Wanyin Lin, Tim Althoff,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have increased interest in their use as therapists to address mental health challenges.<n>We propose BOLT, a proof-of-concept computational framework to systematically assess the conversational behavior of LLM therapists.
• Score: 7.665475687919995
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The emergence of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT has increased interest in their use as therapists to address mental health challenges and the widespread lack of access to care. However, experts have emphasized the critical need for systematic evaluation of LLM-based mental health interventions to accurately assess their capabilities and limitations. Here, we propose BOLT, a proof-of-concept computational framework to systematically assess the conversational behavior of LLM therapists. We quantitatively measure LLM behavior across 13 psychotherapeutic approaches with in-context learning methods. Then, we compare the behavior of LLMs against high- and low-quality human therapy. Our analysis based on Motivational Interviewing therapy reveals that LLMs often resemble behaviors more commonly exhibited in low-quality therapy rather than high-quality therapy, such as offering a higher degree of problem-solving advice when clients share emotions. However, unlike low-quality therapy, LLMs reflect significantly more upon clients' needs and strengths. Our findings caution that LLM therapists still require further research for consistent, high-quality care.

Related papers

• Expressing stigma and inappropriate responses prevents LLMs from safely replacing mental health providers [7.88918403732414]
  We investigate the use of large language models (LLM) to replace mental health providers. Contrary to best practices in the medical community, LLMs express stigma toward those with mental health conditions. We conclude that LLMs should not replace therapists, and we discuss alternative roles for LLMs in clinical therapy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T15:14:21Z)
• Med-CoDE: Medical Critique based Disagreement Evaluation Framework [72.42301910238861]
  The reliability and accuracy of large language models (LLMs) in medical contexts remain critical concerns. Current evaluation methods often lack robustness and fail to provide a comprehensive assessment of LLM performance. We propose Med-CoDE, a specifically designed evaluation framework for medical LLMs to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T16:51:11Z)
• Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
  Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions. We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning. Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z)
• LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
  This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment. We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews. Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z)
• CBT-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Assisting Cognitive Behavior Therapy [67.23830698947637]
  We propose a new benchmark, CBT-BENCH, for the systematic evaluation of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) assistance. We include three levels of tasks in CBT-BENCH: I: Basic CBT knowledge acquisition, with the task of multiple-choice questions; II: Cognitive model understanding, with the tasks of cognitive distortion classification, primary core belief classification, and fine-grained core belief classification; III: Therapeutic response generation, with the task of generating responses to patient speech in CBT therapy sessions. Experimental results indicate that while LLMs perform well in reciting CBT knowledge, they fall short in complex real-world scenarios
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T04:52:57Z)
• Therapy as an NLP Task: Psychologists' Comparison of LLMs and Human Peers in CBT [6.812247730094931]
  We investigate the potential and limitations of using large language models (LLMs) as providers of evidence-based therapy. We replicated publicly accessible mental health conversations rooted in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) to compare session dynamics and counselor's CBT-based behaviors. Our findings show that the peer sessions are characterized by empathy, small talk, therapeutic alliance, and shared experiences but often exhibit therapist drift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T19:19:13Z)
• Interactive Agents: Simulating Counselor-Client Psychological Counseling via Role-Playing LLM-to-LLM Interactions [12.455050661682051]
  We propose a framework that employs two large language models (LLMs) via role-playing for simulating counselor-client interactions. Our framework involves two LLMs, one acting as a client equipped with a specific and real-life user profile and the other playing the role of an experienced counselor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T13:29:59Z)
• An Active Inference Strategy for Prompting Reliable Responses from Large Language Models in Medical Practice [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are non-deterministic, may provide incorrect or harmful responses, and cannot be regulated to assure quality control. Our proposed framework refines LLM responses by restricting their primary knowledge base to domain-specific datasets containing validated medical information. We conducted a validation study where expert cognitive behaviour therapy for insomnia therapists evaluated responses from the LLM in a blind format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T05:00:18Z)
• Quantifying AI Psychology: A Psychometrics Benchmark for Large Language Models [57.518784855080334]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional task-solving capabilities, increasingly adopting roles akin to human-like assistants. This paper presents a framework for investigating psychology dimension in LLMs, including psychological identification, assessment dataset curation, and assessment with results validation. We introduce a comprehensive psychometrics benchmark for LLMs that covers six psychological dimensions: personality, values, emotion, theory of mind, motivation, and intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T16:09:08Z)
• A Novel Nuanced Conversation Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models in Mental Health [42.711913023646915]
  We propose a novel framework for evaluating the nuanced conversation abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) Within it, we develop a series of quantitative metrics developed from literature on using psychotherapy conversation analysis literature. We use our framework to evaluate several popular frontier LLMs, including some GPT and Llama models, through a verified mental health dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T23:46:37Z)
• HealMe: Harnessing Cognitive Reframing in Large Language Models for Psychotherapy [25.908522131646258]
  We unveil the Helping and Empowering through Adaptive Language in Mental Enhancement (HealMe) model. This novel cognitive reframing therapy method effectively addresses deep-rooted negative thoughts and fosters rational, balanced perspectives. We adopt the first comprehensive and expertly crafted psychological evaluation metrics, specifically designed to rigorously assess the performance of cognitive reframing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T09:10:34Z)
• PsychoGAT: A Novel Psychological Measurement Paradigm through Interactive Fiction Games with LLM Agents [68.50571379012621]
  Psychological measurement is essential for mental health, self-understanding, and personal development. PsychoGAT (Psychological Game AgenTs) achieves statistically significant excellence in psychometric metrics such as reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T18:00:30Z)
• Evaluating the Efficacy of Interactive Language Therapy Based on LLM for High-Functioning Autistic Adolescent Psychological Counseling [1.1780706927049207]
  This study investigates the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) in interactive language therapy for high-functioning autistic adolescents. LLMs present a novel opportunity to augment traditional psychological counseling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T07:55:39Z)
• A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models [87.60417393701331]
  Large language models (LLMs) are gaining increasing popularity in both academia and industry. This paper focuses on three key dimensions: what to evaluate, where to evaluate, and how to evaluate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T16:28:35Z)
• Revisiting the Reliability of Psychological Scales on Large Language Models [62.57981196992073]
  This study aims to determine the reliability of applying personality assessments to Large Language Models. Analysis of 2,500 settings per model, including GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Gemini-Pro, and LLaMA-3.1, reveals that various LLMs show consistency in responses to the Big Five Inventory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T15:03:28Z)
• Inducing anxiety in large language models can induce bias [47.85323153767388]
  We focus on twelve established large language models (LLMs) and subject them to a questionnaire commonly used in psychiatry. Our results show that six of the latest LLMs respond robustly to the anxiety questionnaire, producing comparable anxiety scores to humans. Anxiety-induction not only influences LLMs' scores on an anxiety questionnaire but also influences their behavior in a previously-established benchmark measuring biases such as racism and ageism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T16:29:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.